-
Can you verify if the problem exists in the current version of that database: BHW 4.18, and if so, what platform you are on and the version number of your copy of Logos and your copy of the BHW 4.18? Thanks!
-
LHB is the only Hebrew Bible we have that currently has root data. (BHt will have its own root analysis). I haven't really tested the drop down word selector in the Bible Search UI. In the Morph Search tab, it's supposed to only show options that actually occur in the Bible(s) you select for searching, but there's some extra material showing up in that
-
[quote user="Brian W. Davidson"] I am on a Mac. I haven't changes my default resource font from Default. [/quote] OK. There's probably some font-substitution code that is behaving differently on Mac vs. Windows. I'll put in a ticket to Dev on this, and I'll also see if the SBL font designer is willing to add the white brackets to the font the next time
-
[quote user="Brian W. Davidson"] Vincent, I know this is minute, but technically there shouldn't be a space between the double brackets and the single brackets in 2+1:5, correct? [/quote] There's no extra space there, actually. It's that the glyphs for those square brackets in this font have really wide margins.
-
The brackets display fine for me with SBL Hebrew: So I'm wondering a few things. 1) Are you on a Mac? And 2) Have you changed your 'default resource font' from 'Default' to something else? 3) What version number of Logos are you running and what is the support info for the version of QSM?
-
This layout was done by design. Of course, it must be going on a decade ago, so it's an older design. Tables worked a little differently in our software when this was made. But the reason Genesis was done this way was that the verse-by-verse sections of the print had a split between less-technical commentary on the top of the page and more technical
-
Thanks for the suggestion, David. I think these kinds of editions are interesting. I've consulted them on occasion - when I'm unsure of where the accent falls on a word with a post-positive or a pre-positive accent (where the position of the accent doesn't necessarily tell you the normal stress syllable) or to find out what a metheg is doing (metheg
-
Yes, there is one or more bugs going on here. At least one, I am told, has been addressed in internal builds (to do with unnecessary conversions between lemma data type references that causes some significant loss of hits). But there may be another issue with K/Q pairs not being handled well (note how this result is showing the K surface form, but the
-
Dahood's 3-volume set on Psalms in the Anchor Bible has a lot of references to Ugaritic literature. https://www.logos.com/product/41424/psalms-i-1-50 https://www.logos.com/product/41425/psalms-ii-51-100 https://www.logos.com/product/41426/the-anchor-yale-bible-psalms-iii-101-150
-
The Andersen-Forbes database is a fantastic resource, and you can still run all the same searches, visual filters, etc. directly on the Andersen-Forbes Analyzed Text. There were a number of reasons why we decided to make our own in-house Hebrew Bible (LHB). One of the most important benefits was to be in control of how the text is broken into segments
-
Sure, so you can assign any morph criteria you want (presuming the database you are searching tags that feature). If you don't care about the order of terms, just throw them in an unordered group. Assuming 'conjugated' here means 'finite', I'll exclude participles and infinitives from Word2, but you can tweak this to fit what you're looking for. Here
-
This is a syntax search, of course. When you're setting up each 'word' element, make sure to click 'matching skips levels' so you don't have to worry matching all the internal structure. The special sauce is to add an agreement operator to the second word telling it to match the lemma of the first word. You could, of course, use 'sentence' or 'phrase
-
[quote user="David Knoll"] Perhaps the two attributes were programmed to be mutually exclusive. [/quote] Since this thread was recently linked to, I'll give it some closure. We updated to BHW 4.18 , the latest version of the Westminster data (I don't think the 4.20 has ben released yet, though the Alan J. Groves site is down as I write this, so I can
-
[quote user="David Knoll"] https://community.logos.com/forums/t/35511.aspx [/quote] David, we updated to the latest Westminster data almost a year ago ( version 4.18 , which you probably got for free if you already had the old 4.2) and teased apocopation out into a separate field in the structure of our morph codes so that there wouldn't be problems
-
[quote user="Chris Robbers (Faithlife)"] [quote user="Bradley Grainger (Faithlife)"]In this case, it appears that LEB is missing some roots. I've opened an inquiry about this.[/quote] This will be fixed in an upcoming update to the LEB reverse interlinear resource. Thanks for the report! [/quote] We actually have a significant update to LHB and all
-
Yes, this is a bug: our software is normalizing Hebrew (changing the order of the combining marks) before display, arriving at combinations that the tables in the font were not designed to render properly. I've had a ticket in with development on this for some time. Thanks for reporting this.
-
What version of the Android OS are you running? If memory serves me right, 4.2 was the first release to start working with Open Type layout tables for complex scripts like Hebrew.
-
The order of the clause initial constituents matters in the search you constructed, so it won't find Gen 31:53 because you're asking for the verb CIC to occur before the subject. You might try putting both CICs in an unordered group inside the clause. I haven't tried reconstructing your query, but I think that will work.
-
[quote user="Martin Grainger Dean"]Hi Angela. Does the Search Panel Morph with new values to the LHB Morphologies (Paragogic Nûn – n, Energic Nûn – e) will be added to 5.3 Beta also? And if it does when? Thanks, Martin.[/quote] Martin, you won't get any hits on those fields until we ship the new data, though I do think that will happen soonish. And
-
[quote user="Martin Grainger Dean"]Logos, thanks for the Hebrew Audio Pronunciations! But where can I find the support info for this file? I can't see it in About Logos tab... Martin.[/quote] I've put in a Dev ticket for adding these resources to the About page in a future update of Logos 5.