-
I have both so I have compared them in the past. For the NIDNTTE Silva took the text of the the original and edited it. None of the original authors are listed with the articles in the new edition and some have been edited more than others. Personally I'd go for the NIDNTTE. Here is some information from the intro which explains much: 1. General revisions
-
[quote user="SineNomine"] That is both exactly what I expected and extraordinarily annoying. Faithlife, if you're reading, this is an area where we really need better support for Latin. (Specifically, for text tagged as being in Latin, the letters "v" and "u" should be treated as interchangeable. As a stopgap measure, a lot of the benefit could be supplied
-
They haven't said but based on past releases we can expect the free L9 engine upgrade in the first quarter of 2021.
-
I don't have the OLD so I can't check but what happens if you open the ventus entry in another Latin dictionary. Are you able to right arrow / left arrow to the OLD entry for ventus?
-
[quote user="Graham Criddle"] Good point - but the use of Sense tagging is designed to help address that issue (among other things). But even with the combined search, the numbers are quite distinct [/quote] There is a problem though in that all the "kingdom of heaven" occurrences in Matthew are included which really skews the numbers. If "kingdom of
-
I was searching for The Open and Unafraid just now and in the search box on logos.com it shows the book complete with its subtitle but when the results come there is only a Baker Academic OT bundle displayed which has nothing to do with this book. There is no indication as to why the book is not showing.
-
I've opened every one. I just don't allow trackers to load.
-
I would suggest that the quickest way to get this in Logos would be for Americans to write their political representatives and demand they stop granting copyright extensions and forcing those terms on other nations during trade negotiations. e.g. C.S. Lewis is public domain in Canada and Tolkien will be in 2024 but not if the US government gets their
-
Definitely worth it! Buy now, think later.
-
https://www.logos.com/kerusso-collective :)
-
The only place I see it mentioned is in L9 itself but even when I click on "Get a Logos 9 library" it's only offering me collections with the full feature upgrade.
-
[quote user="David Wanat"] My understanding would be that while WS users probably have the right to have the resources restored, FL can’t start selling it to others without permission from the publisher (USCCB) [/quote] I take Phil's post here https://community.logos.com/forums/p/193801/1116803.aspx#1116803 to mean that Faithlife now owns WS's
-
[quote user="David Wanat"] [quote user="MJ. Smith"] note this is a Wordsearch product. [/quote] Still curious though... unless I’m mistaken on the rights being withdrawn (entirely possible) [/quote] Wordsearch has the rights / Logos bought Wordsearch / ergo Logos owns the rights along with Wordsearch At least that's my thinking if you're right
-
When I restarted after the restart to update message 9.1 opened and then crashed soon after. I reopened it and things seem ok now. I've attached all the logs from the crash. 0121.9.1 beta 1 crash.zip
-
What more does a Logos user need than a fish on their car and another on their screen?
-
It's the current Logos beta. https://community.logos.com/forums/t/194483.aspx Check out the introductory entry in the beta forum for warnings and instructions on switching to the beta (and unswitching) https://community.logos.com/forums/t/52967.aspx Hope this helps, Tom
-
It's not my birthday this month but I did receive the PAM email.
-
Great idea ... although adding 100 most cited resources might change the list of top cited resources :)
-
You seem to be on beta 16. You should probably update to 8.17 and try again although this issues doesn't seem to be mentioned in the notes. https://community.logos.com/forums/t/193723.aspx Tom
-
[quote user="DAL"] There is yet another sale called “The Second Coming of Systematic Theologies” found here: https://www.logos.com/wayne-grudem-systematic-theology?utm_source=faithlifeadnetwork&utm_medium=advertising_internal&utm_campaign=promo-wgtheology&utm_content=31-728x90 DAL [/quote] There you have it folks - the second