-
[quote user="MJ. Smith"]Fantastic! You will join Denise and myself as the very demanding computer system nerds who ... well, I'll let others describe us. Let's just say we can flush out obscurities with the best of them. [/quote] Ha! - (Who's Denise?)
-
[quote user="NB.Mick"]MJ created a bug report in the beta forum, maybe we'll get some info there: https://community.logos.com/forums/p/199173/1155893.aspx#1155893 [/quote] Great! Thanks, everyone! As a side note, in my former life, I was a computer programmer (32 years). My specialty was flushing out bugs. Guess I haven't lost my touch, amen? LOL!
-
[quote user="Dave Hooton"]The two Find boxes work differently[/quote] I realize that now. Thanks, Dave, and for taking the time to illustrate. What you pictured is what I'm doing. So the answer to my question (subject of this thread) is yes. As you've illustrated, manually scrolling is the only way to see "hits" that are beyond what's displayed on the
-
[quote user="SineNomine"] [quote user="Sharon Hillam"]his[/quote] her [/quote] Oops! Sorry. Thanks for the correction.
-
[quote user="MJ. Smith"]The one on the right controls the translation used within the text of the FSB. The one on the left controls the translation shown by references in the pop-up/open.[/quote] Well okay then! That makes sense...except the control on the left (which translation is used for pop-up/open references) is ONLY showing my default Bible
-
[quote user="Graham Criddle"] If you set the one on the right to use the ESV, the FSB should display the text of the ESV. I've just checked and it works here [/quote] It works here, too. And MJ has an answer for the left drop-down, but it's not working for me. See my response to his reply below.
-
I have the FSB open and see on the top bar next to // (parallel resource sets) TWO drop-down menus allowing you to set the Bible translation. The first allows me to set it to ANY of my many Bibles. The 2nd is restricted to default, ESV, KJ1900, NASB95, NKJ, NIV, NRSV, I read the section, "Using Faithlife Study Bible," in the Preface and it says, " To
-
[quote user="Dave Hooton"]There is a Search box in the UI; not CTRL+F. The Notes with results are positioned conveniently, but you have to search each manually (no highlighted term).[/quote] Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't have a UI within a given note. And that's what I'm talking about. I'm working WITHIN a note I already have open to full
-
Correct me if I'm wrong (Please!), but my understanding is that while there are multiple ways to search Notes in order to locate the specific notes where a search term is found, as of Logos 9, you still have to either manually scan the note itself, looking for the word or phrase, OR use the CTRL-F to highlight the search term. And in the latter case
-
[quote user="Dave Hooton"]It would also find other values in the Filter sidebar e.g. Notebook names, Author names, but they will appear under their respective headings, so you just look for the heading Tags. [/quote] Yep...already figured that out. Thanks, Dave!
-
[quote user="NB.Mick"]I'd expect "book" and "info" to appear in those extra search hit notes somewhere as words or parts of words.[/quote] You're probably right. I tried searching using the term: Book Info. Then I also tried the term: "Book Info". No difference. Both "find" 12 notes whereas it should only find 8. BUT in working with this I discovered
-
I'm reasonably certain that I've stumbled upon a bug in Logos Notes. I've tagged seven notes (all are in different Notebooks) Book Info. In each of these notes, I also have the text, "Book Info" (first line). When I open ALL Logos Notes (no filtering) and type"Book Info" in the Search box, it brings up 12 notes. The five extras are NOT tagged and neither
-
[quote user="Jason Coke"] When text searching within a note (using Ctrl+f), most programs will automatically take you to the location of your first hit and make the highlighted hit visible. In Notes, this isn't happening. While it appears to scroll down (movement is happening within the note) I still need to scroll further down until the highlighted
-
[quote user="Andrew Batishko (Faithlife)"]The only functionality associated with those resources is that if they are download, a preview will show up in Factbook if you select the entry associated with one of the lists.[/quote] Great! Thanks, Andrew!
-
My question has to do with how the software works. I don't remember where (maybe the Concordance tool or Bible browser?), but in one of the Morris Proctor training videos, he explained that Logos can list all of the miracles, prayers, etc. in a Bible book or section. I know there are Datasets that define this internally, but what about the "Faithlife
-
[quote user="Dave Hooton"] Monographs with Bible milestones like these will be listed under All Parallel Resources , which does not mix resource Types. So Bible Notes only will be shown with NET Bible Notes (you can see this if you enter type:bible-notes in the Library Find box). Similarly, All Parallel Resources will list only type:study-bible when
-
[quote user="MJ. Smith"]I would suspect that these are the only resources with "Bible Notes" as their resource type in your library. WordSearch items that are not fully converted have missing indexes and are generally type:monograph.[/quote] You are probably correct in that these are the only two resources categorized by Logos as Bible Notes for purposes
-
[quote user="MJ. Smith"]resources appear in parallel resources primarily when you have created a collection and turned on the parallel resources option.[/quote] Really? Maybe we're talking something different because none of the four resources I've mentioned in this thread are in any collections. I didn't even know you could turn the PR option on and
-
Two more examples of seemingly weird Parallel Resource "groupings", but under Bible Handbook (not Commentaries): What the Bible is All About: Bible Handbook (Meers) and Hard Sayings of the Bible
-
Just after posting this, I found this: BOTH are listed under the category Bible Notes when you use the Commentaries Section and sort by Type. And they are the ONLY TWO that are listed. But it still begs the question as to why these TWO are coded or classified this way? I can work with them, now that I understand how they are grouped; just curious.