-
Memory usage/consumption and management are two different things. Nevertheless, Accordance's memory requirements are lower than Logos, even on my Mac.
-
Sadly, my comparison wasn't that Logos had these capabilities (64bit, OpenCL, GCD) and Accordance didn't. Logos 4 certainly doesn't or might not support these capabilities given the Mono (.NET port) based architecture on the Mac. The comparison was directed to the folks at Accordance who still aren't writing a modern Mac App (and OS X is their primary
-
Mick, I am laughing now due to the lovely autocorrect feature on the iPad. Thank you for pointing out the error, as I did mean to say "throw." Matthew
-
Fr. Charles. I am sorry if what I wrote implied that I thought Mono/WPF was a better platform than Carbon. In fact, neither are ideal, especially on the Mac. And yes, Accordance is much faster than Logos - I never stated otherwise. My comments were on the GUI, not the overall user experience (which does include software performance). I also agree with
-
DMB, Yes, I was referring to the Mac version. I can't comment on a product (Accordance for Windows) that has only been announced and isn't in any level of public availability. To expand upon my statement from the original post (lipstick…), since moving to OS X, Accordance has been a Carbon-based App. Accordance wasn't rewritten for Cocoa, so it can
-
Bob, This is a well reasoned reply and thank you for taking the time to write this response. As a user of both products, each has its merits and deficiencies. Having recently upgraded to Accordance 10, and to make an impolite quote, v10 is "lipstick on the pig." Similar to Logos poor choice in development technologies, OakTree continues to develop a
-
Tom, Yes, that finally fixed it. Thank you so much. Blessings to you and the team at BibleTech 2010. Matthew
-
Tom, I tried this to with no success. I also do not have the mono framework installed. Ideas? Matthew
-
Unfortunately, that did not work. Still having the problem with A16. The app won't save my sign-in credentials.
-
Bump - any help here?
-
Same issue happened with A13/A13a. Is this a pref file issue? Is there a workaround (getting tired of typing my username/password at each launch). Thanks, Matthew
-
I would recommend searching through the forums for additional feedback. From my personal testing, I am seeing better throughput with P5 running WinXP. However, Fusion is more reliable (I haven't crashed with it compared to P5). I have two different VMs: MBPro (mid 2009 model) 2.4Ghz/4GB RAM/Parallels 5 (latest build) + WinXP iMac (mid 2008 model) 3
-
I have seen the same issue. I didn't force a reindex, but I am curious if this is a bug...
-
Rich, I run both Windows XP and Win7 on Parallels 5. They both work quite well. My recommendation to you is to create an all-new VM with XP. Then, install all of the SPs. The Windows Activation will work fine, because the VM will be identical to your current troubled one (the one that won't upgrade SP3). Then, install Logos 4. Alternatively, you can
-
+1. Or an SDK, or something!
-
Interesting. I am unaware that these were available options on Fusion. I'll go check this out. Thank you very much. Matthew
-
Which blog? Do you recall the address?
-
Ok, trying some additional settings: 2GB RAM, graphics acceleration enabled = good performance 1.5GB RAM, graphics acceleration disabled = great performance I am going to stick with the 2GB RAM settings for now as I would like to test it out a little more. If I have to de-res, at least I know I have a high-performant option. For those new to the thread
-
Robert, Thank you. I do like that I gain a little real estate with the smaller toolbar buttons. M
-
Ok, just did some additional trials. Turning off graphics acceleration does speed up the application, especially when displaying new content. Thanks for the tips guys!