-
[quote user="George Somsel"]Why would they need to license an existing text? Surely after all these years it is public domain.[/quote] Are you talking about: von Gall, August's Der hebräische Pentateuch der Samaritaner (other editions?) or simply the Abisha Scroll manuscript of the Samaritan Pentateuch? I am not sure what the hold up is with the Pentateuch
-
[quote user="George Somsel"] Whatever happened to Baby Jane the Samaritan Pentateuch? [/quote] I, don't know, but I am sure they could easy modify the Pentateuch of their lexham Hebrew Bible and create their own version of the Samaritan Pentateuch. That, should be much easier and quicker than for them to try license an existing text.
-
-
[quote user="Lee"] I thought we already had it? [/quote] After, so many years it should have been released by now.
-
[quote user="abondservant"] I like things as they are. As has been said before, as long as I don't HAVE to switch - I'm not opposed. .. [/quote] I like this line of thought!
-
[quote user="George Somsel"] Not for me, but it might interest some—so long as you continue to offer "books to own." I suppose there might be an occasional work that would be of interest to rent, but not often. Perhaps a preview period (I know, there is always the 30 day money back offer). [/quote] I agree with George Somsel!
-
[quote user="abondservant"]Sorry for the delayed reply, the worst post was edited or deleted shortly after my post :) (also it wasn't one you wrote). I've been on vacation and camping. which has been nice. Hope your thanksgiving was as good as it could be if that is a holiday celebrated in your country.[/quote] First, Thank you for your response! Second
-
[quote user="Rokas"] Graphical search engine would be very nice. [/quote] I agree! And, a graph results feature for Syntax searches !
-
Roise, Thank you so much posting here you have been very helpful. I found that there are only about 26 items in the new Biblical Language Package I do not have in some way. And, all I can acquire through either the online store or through a sale representative.
-
Thank you again! I wonder if Randy Sims and others have put one together that has a listening of the resources in Logos 6 Biblical Language Package to compare that, too. EDIT: POST SCRIPT Although, I am technically unable to put in my cart because I am not an academic, I can see that there are about 28 resources in the new package that I do not own
-
[quote user="Denise"]BK ... please feel free to tell me I'm wrong. But I know the L3 OL package was wafer-thin.[/quote] I don't know about the L3 OL. The first two packages I got were Logos 4 Original language package (JG) and the SESB 3.0 and I was fairly happy with them still am(of course I supplemented then by getting better lexicons), although I
-
[quote user="Rosie Perera"] Dan Pritchett gives the official word from the company on this here . Bottom line: it's OK to mention the names of competitors, as long as it's in a way that is relevant to Logos, and it isn't advertising the competitor's product (e.g., glorifying how much better it is than Logos) or linking to it. [/quote] Thank you Roise
-
[quote user="SineNomine"] [quote user="BKMitchell"] What are you talking about Abondservant ? I know of the logos guidelines, but I know nothing of any rules! And, there is nothing in the guidelines that say one can not mention any other software company. [/quote] See here. [/quote] See, what? The guidelines that I already mentioned?
-
What are you talking about Abondservant ? I know of the logos guidelines, but I know nothing of any rules! And, there is nothing in the guidelines that say one can not mention any other software company. Also Abondservant my point and I think the point of this thread is not advertising but to improve Logos, and to get Logos/Faithlife to again offer
-
[quote user="George Somsel"] I have had the Original Languages package since L3. Now I'm listed as having the Scholars Program, but I'm not sure whether I got that in L3 or L4. It really doesn't matter what they call it: Straw, Wood, Brass … Dilithium [/quote] Well, in someways I agree this can be a game of semantics and branding. So, yeah you have
-
[quote user="Brooks Cochran"] I also had the B.L. series/package. Out of respect for forum rules, once I lost the options to purchase the package in 5 & 6 I went with the "other program" that specifically is aimed at working/studying with the text. [/quote] Thank you for posting here! This is the type of voice FaithLife/Logos needs to hear, more. [quote
-
[quote user="James Hiddle"]NB Mick is right it is sold to academic students. Lesson folks always read the fine print. [/quote] Logos 4 Original Languages, was the last Biblical Language base package that was sold to anyone regardless of whether or not they were in academia. Starting with Logos5 (and continuing with Logos6 ) the Logos Biblical Language
-
[quote user="MJ. Smith"] I fear that to me your list is a better argument for it to be a Logos/Verbum package than a Noet package. But thank you for the information, [/quote] Then, who would that be marketed to? (Sure, some of normal users of Logos would buy them, and maybe Messianic= Christians of Jewish decent) But, isn't the whole idea of a Jewish
-
Here is dated, but information on issues that still apply to morphological tagging: (Warring: the Bible Software programs mentioned below have evolved, and have a lot more morphological tagged texts than they did back in the 90's when this was written) [quote] Researchers who use these tools should be aware of how these potential pitfalls can affect
-
[quote user="MJ. Smith"]May I ask why? I don't see Classical Hebrew as having a major literary tradition compared, for example, to Old Norse epics or Sanskrit.[/quote] I do not know anything anything about Old Norse or Sanskirt, but as for Classical Hebrew, it continued to be used for written com munication, commentaries, sermons, poetry, wills, and