-
[quote user="Fr Devin Roza"]As a general petition, what I would hope for on a most basic level from the Search Query builder is that it make inserting special commands for searches (such as the search extensions, etc.) as easy as possible. And that the options of what can be included within those search extensions also be easy to filter and select.
-
I agree.
-
Update: Turned out to be a book issue. Kyle's team is aware and working on it. I can see their case load and it looks like they have pinpointed the issue and know what to do to fix it, and should issue an update as soon as it's ready.
-
Update: Turned out to be a book issue. Kyle's team is aware and working on it. I can see their case load and it looks like they have pinpointed the issue and know what to do to fix it, and should issue an update as soon as it's ready.
-
I think it's a bug, or rather an incomplete design. (We should have a "mark complete" command on the menu of the upper-right of the card.)
-
I take it that Mark's point is that the AND operator will match more generously than INTERSECTS by definition. In this example, the two queries coincidentally happen to produce the same results, as you found. However, that won't necessarily happen for every example. I don't know this data set very well, so maybe that coincidence holds for all cases
-
Hi, Timothy. Logos is powerful but complex. The learning curve can be daunting. Here are a couple of tips to get you started. 1) Type a Bible reference (like John 3:16 or even just Jn 3:16) into the box with the "Go" button and press "Go." This will load up a Bible to that reference. Try topics like "love" or "baptism" as well. 2) The second button
-
Thanks, MJ.
-
I'll put it on the list. Thanks, MJ.
-
The configuration isn't applied until you leave the popup, yes. This is intentional. It prevents potentially long-running background work (eg, adding a collection or series) from negatively impacting the performance of the popup. [quote user="Dave Hooton"]Why are only two resources greyed out?[/quote] Whenever your save name is different than the abbreviations
-
They were generated from the data type info files (which define what the data type is) but I don't know what the order in those files represents. It is likely ultimately from the first resource that was used to create the data type (common), or alphanumeric by _internal_ representation (rare).
-
Hi, Harry. The platform allows for us to add pretty much any word-level data. I know we have some plans to extend into non-morph data eventually, but I'm not sure when.
-
[quote user="Martin Folley"] Logos Bible Software 7.2 7.2.0.0020 I can only see 'Available courses' ... [/quote] Looks like a bug then. I'll get someone to follow up. Sorry about that!
-
[quote user="PetahChristian"]Regardless of how the requirements are divided, the really important point is to restore those "not required" readings, as many of us might need or choose to learn something from them.[/quote] Yes indeed. We've got that on the list and I figure we'll see it in 7.3 -- Lord willing and the creek don't rise.
-
[quote user="Disciple of Christ (doc)"]This hand picked list is s poor decision for my needs, I don't want somebody who does not know me or what I want to get out of these courses determine what I should or should not see listed. Everything should be listed. Just because only one reading in the whole course comes from that resource does not mean that
-
[quote user="PetahChristian"]I only see Mobile.Ed courses that I own. I expected to also see courses I don't own, returning in 7.2, but there's no "Partially unavailable" or "Unavailable" sections for courseware. Is this a bug that needs to be reported?[/quote] We did a little bit of internal investigation, and you really should be seeing multiple headings
-
[quote user="PetahChristian"] This is actually a pet peeve. I don't like buying a course, then discovering that some of its resources are unavailable, even if they are not required. To pay "full price" for something, yet only be possible to complete a "portion" of what I paid for, doesn't seem right or fair. If you charge "100%," we should be able to
-
[quote user="PetahChristian"] This is actually a pet peeve. I don't like buying a course, then discovering that some of its resources are unavailable, even if they are not required. To pay "full price" for something, yet only be possible to complete a "portion" of what I paid for, doesn't seem right or fair. If you charge "100%," we should be able to
-
[quote user="PetahChristian"] Were you referring to the existing "Suggested Reading" and "See also" sections that show up both in the course segments and in the spreadsheets? I would jump for joy if the Courses tool requirements used the same two levels to split up the requirements list, as I already make heavy use of that spreadsheet information outside
-
RE: Showing all the courses In 7.2. I might be wrong about what ships when, because I tend to run internal versions and betas. Not at my desk. Will confirm tomorrow.