-
Happy to oblige, Bruce! I completely agree with your suggestion, too. I'm not personally very well positioned to act on interactive feedback at the moment, but I'll pass this thread along to the editorial team. Peace!
-
Hi, Bruce. The categorization really just reflects the collective opinion of the editors. The statement in the About is as accurate a description as we could give, but what follows is a little more about how the sausage was made if that's helpful. We didn't provide definitions because we didn't want to embark on a thorough analysis of genre. We spent
-
[quote user="MJ. Smith"]I understand why this would appeal to many users. However, I like the chat aspect where I can look back at the answer to recent questions when I've forgotten an important point.[/quote] Wouldn't have to be an either-or proposition.
-
There is a case for adding Ctrl+F to panels that need it, including Factbook. I'll link this thread to the case.
-
[quote user="EastTN"] One that drives me crazy is the inability to delete my answers out of a textbook so I can work through it again. [/quote] Resource inputs are now stored in the Notes tool, so you have full control over them from there. You can get to the note by clicking the little note indicator to the right of the resource input. To bulk delete
-
It's a bug, either mine or in the third-party graphing library. I'll file it and fix it asap.
-
We agree: That's not gonna work. Thanks for calling it out!
-
[quote user="PL"]Any plans to expand this tool to include OT/OT and NT/NT intertextual relationships?[/quote] More like inklings of ideas than plans at this point.
-
The bug in this thread has been fixed, is in testing now, and will appear in a resource update soon. (I did not also add Enoch data, just fixed the bug.) Thanks again!
-
Thanks for the report! I tested it out a little, and it seems like it's working as designed with regard to Corpus. From the About: [quote] The books selected for the visualization are any books in the current filter set that are either source or target (either OT or NT) for an intertextual relationship. So, if you filter down to New Testament , don
-
I concur. :D
-
Ah, my mistake. Carry on!
-
[quote user="Dave Hooton"] Shouldn't it be: User Series title OR Series abbreviation (new metadata added to commentary resources); OR Series title OR Resource abbreviation (if no series, eg, single-volume commentaries) OR Resource title where a User created series title trumps all? [/quote] I reckon that's in with "Series title" now, but I see your
-
Kevin is correct. The dataset I'm visualizing only has NT to OT data. You can also consult resources of type:Bible Harmony . We've made quite a few that stretch the traditional definition of parallel passages to include broader allusions.
-
[quote user="Kiyah"]when I click on a book in the Apocrypha to try to get a search of all the NT books that link to it, nothing comes up.[/quote] That's a bug, which I'll look into ASAP. Apocryphal books should behave just like any other OT book does. (Barring any unforeseen issues, I should be able to copy over the links to Enoch while I'm at it.)
-
[quote user="Kiyah"] Question : why are there no intext linkages with Enoch? Not even allusions/echos, or the citation in Jude 14-15 ?[/quote] I used the "NT use of the OT" dataset, which doesn't include those. I'd like to; I believe there are linkages in the Ancient Literature dataset, but I didn't farm any links from there.
-
... and to be clear, you shouldn’t have to change your preferred Bible, just the resource parameter in the Search panel.
-
By design, actually. It’s using the last setting of the panel. The search link in the interactive doesn’t set the resource in the search because (other) users get frustrated, eg, if you wanted the Greek NT but I keep forcibly setting it to your preferred Bible. Plus, many of these intertext sets have Catholic Bible refs in them, so we’d be selecting
-
Oops. Hiya, MJ!
-
Thanks! These are great suggestions. You could add them to https://feedback.faithlife.com and invite others to vote for them.