Search

Search in sorted by
  • Re: NASB in Paragraph Format

    [quote user="Disciple of Christ (doc)"] [quote user="James McAdams"]Don't be daft.[/quote] James you make a lot of valuable contributions to these forums with your questions about FL's products and your sharing of your experiences and learnings about the products. This is not one of your finest moments. You have allowed yourself to fall into the trap
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Fri, Jun 23 2017
  • Re: NASB in Paragraph Format

    [quote user="David Paul"] I use NASB95 for many reasons, one of which is the line-per-verse presentation. And while some may have this attitude... [quote user="Thomas Sterbens"] Still, I would be glad to pay for the resource in the old format if it were made available. [/quote] ...I am not so accommodating. I'm not going to pay for this resource again
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Mon, Jun 19 2017
  • Re: Yes or No?

    [quote user="LMAM"] [quote user="Disciple of Christ (doc) I still think that the direct approach would be better for him in this instance. OP could even send an email to Bob Pritchett, that's what I did when I had some serious concerns over the direction LN was heading, [/quote] In fact, I did send an e-mail to him last month about this issue. This
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Sun, Jun 18 2017
  • Yes or No?

    Come on FaithLife! Are you going to restore the NASB95 in it's original format or not? Or are you going to continue this dribble fix of a few aspects to try to satisfy a few of our desires in the hope that we'll shut up and put up with your nonsensical approach? Just for once give us a clear answer - YES or NO!!!
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Sat, Jun 17 2017
  • Re: NASB in Paragraph Format

    [quote user="David Paul"] I have been ignoring this thread since I first posted to it back in April, residing in my blissfully ignorant usage of L3 and my line-per-verse version of 95. I clicked on this thread just now and was horrified to hear what had happened to my preferred Bible in L7! Plain and simple, this is !!!! FREAKING OUTRAGEOUS !!!! and
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Sat, Jun 17 2017
  • Re: NASB in Paragraph Format

    [quote user="Mike Henry Sr."] Since it seems FL is counting, I prefer the verse format. I hope we can get a full version in that format soon. I just tried the Visual Filters and it is disappointing. Can you please put the version back to the original? [/quote] Me too. But good luck with that. The only important people it seems are the ones that want
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Fri, Jun 2 2017
  • Re: NASB in Paragraph Format

    [quote user="Elijahpower"] I received the latest update of NASB95 today and it is in the paragraph format. I happen to prefer the verse form, but it will not go back to it. When I click on verse option it stays paragraph. It would be nice to have both formats work. Thank you. [/quote] You can get back to a semblance of the original if you're prepared
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Thu, Jun 1 2017
  • Re: NASB in Paragraph Format

    [quote user="Kyle G. Anderson"] We're looking into improvements to the visual filter. This wasn't a change that came out of nowhere. NASB95 has been a tricky Bible for years. When it was in a one verse/one line format it bothered the people who preferred the paragraph formatting. As an aid for those who preferred the one verse/one line it was formatted
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Thu, Jun 1 2017
  • Re: NASB in Paragraph Format

    [quote user="alabama24"] [quote user="Frank Payne"]As of today, that visual filter seems to be missing.[/quote] Click on the visual filter menu for the NASB (three circles icon) Click on the carrot/arrow for "Bible text only" Check "one verse per line" [/quote] Oh - tried that did you? And that got the NSAB back to the previous format did it? I think
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Thu, Jun 1 2017
  • Re: NASB in Paragraph Format

    Wonderful!!! Was it really necessary to screw the rest of us so that a few can be satisfied???? Now I go to use my NASB95 this morning and all the settings have been changed without my OK, everything is in paragraph format when I want verse format, after much playing around with settings I can sort of get things where I want it but without appropriate
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Thu, Jun 1 2017
  • Re: Since when does 86 = 88?

    It's an alternate fact.
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Sun, May 14 2017
  • Re: Is this true?

    Did you mean search or "search"? As you probably know by now if you're watching the news at all, there is quite a difference now. "Search" can apparently mean anything you want it to. In my previous post, I "searched" Logos to find the information. If you mean the search program you could search for the individual verses in any given Bible or in a Bible
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Thu, Mar 16 2017
  • Re: Is this true?

    Matthew 17:21 omit verse {A} Since there is no satisfactory reason why the passage, if originally present in Matthew, should have been omitted in a wide variety of witnesses, and since copyists frequently inserted material derived from another Gospel, it appears that most manuscripts have been assimilated to the parallel in Mk 9:29. Matthew 18:11 omit
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Thu, Mar 16 2017
  • Re: Daniel 3:28 - Who is the Angel?

    My opinion for what it's worth. The angel was an agent of God. It's no more specific than that. Unless there is a good contextual reason for identifying that agent, I think it's best left indefinite just as the scripture does.
    Posted to Logos 7 by Alex Scott on Tue, Feb 21 2017
  • Re: Logos 7 Basic Available Now (formerly free core engine)

    As usual, either a sloppy presentation or misleading. According to the above, if we switch from Logos 6 to Logos 7, we lose the Atlas, Bible Sense. Timeline, Passage Analysis, and Pronunciation. I certainly won't be taking that step until such time as that's cleared up for us.
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Wed, Feb 8 2017
  • Re: Amazing problem WARNING

    DAL. Why don't you go away and TROLL somewhere else. I'm sure you know what the definition of a troll is don't you.
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Thu, Jan 5 2017
  • Re: D.A. Carson Logos 7 Exclusive Bundle (49 vols.)

    Another kick in the teeth to long time users.
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Fri, Sep 23 2016
  • Re: "Members Now" membership.

    I'm with you Rick. I've been using Logos almost from the beginning. I have invested over $30 thousand dollars in the resources I wanted. But that's not enough for Logos. Now they want even more money just to keep up with the program. The problem with Logos, or FL if you like is that it is getting more and more like Zondervan every passing day. When
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Tue, Sep 20 2016
  • Re: Membership has it's privledges

    Yes - membership has it's privileges I guess. Meanwhile those of us who have spent multiple tens of thousands of dollars over the years are now second class citizens unless we want to spend even more to be in the IN group.
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Mon, Aug 22 2016
  • Re: Free Vyrso Book - June 27th - Survice or Thrive: 6 Relationships Every Pastor Needs

    Also 4 Jesus Calling Discussion Guides.
    Posted to General by Alex Scott on Sun, Jun 26 2016
Page 2 of 33 (650 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last » |