-
I tried it out with the Textus Receptus 1894 and it moved verse by verse but no arrow. Also remember that there are different readings in the Textuas Receptus that are not in the UBS/NA27. The recording of the Greek Audio New Testament was done from the critical text so will not match up exactly. I also tried it with the Lexham Syntactic Greek New Testament
-
[quote user="Richard DeRuiter"] [quote user="alanleerosenaur"]I have to respectfully disagree. To say that if someone desires to discuss their views, cause, etc... let them leave and find another forum, why?[/quote] Allan, You'll note I didn't say what you object to. I said "for those who would come just to promote their cause, views, etc., let 'em
-
So your definition rests on the identity of Jesus and nothing else? So for you Baptists, Methodists, Catholics, Greek Orthodox, Presbyterians, churches of Christ, Calvinists, King James Only folks, ect. Are not considered cult groups? The problem is that everyone has a different definition for the word “cult” so you might mean it in one way but when
-
The word "cult" has lost all meaning in our day and age. Anyone who disagrees with us is considered in a cult now. People who are King James Only are cult members, people who hold to the modern text and textual criticism are cult members. The Baptists who are Calvinists are in a cult. ect, ect, ect. The word is only used to inflame. It is intended to
-
I added them to the resource folder and then opened up Libronix and my library and there they were.
-
1,880 unlocked
-
"We have to educate believers. Instead of trying to isolate laypeople from critical scholarship, we need to insulate them. They need to be ready for the barrage, because it is coming. The intentional dumbing down of the church for the sake of filling more pews will ultimately lead to defection from Christ." - Dan Wallace My Favorite Passage That’s Not
-
The autographs are gone but we still have what the authors originally wrote in the manuscript tradition. When we talk about inerrancy in my mind we are talking about the originals. If we are asking do we have the word of God today the answer is yes but there are places that we are unsure what the original reading was but we have it it’s just one of
-
Notice my error. It should read “Natural” not "Nature". Here is an example of what we have in the manuscript evidence but notice every one reading my post would understand and know this was a mistake. [quote user="JamesChaisson"] ...but once copying started the nature result would ... [/quote]
-
Ease up on the attitude. If you don’t agree just say so don’t get all upset about it. I don’t think that I am dogging anything. God inspired the prophets and Apostles to write down his words guided by the Holy Spirit but once copying started the nature result would be some errors such as spelling and others but I believe we have the original word of
-
It would probably be more appropriate to discuss some of these things in a Bible class (Something I am going to be doing myself in a few months) than it would be to preach on it but if I were to preach it (I would not) I would say a few words at the beginning to let people know that this is not original but that I thought it was a piece of true history
-
College Press NIV Commentary Word Biblical Commentary
-
WORDSearch is selling the 16 volumes for 299.95 but I just looked on the Biblesoft website (PC Study Bible) and unless I am missing something they are selling all 16 for 41.95??? http://store.biblesoft.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=FirstCorb00207
-
I have no problem with the passage being included or excluded based on theology my concern is with the textual evidence.
-
My view is that only what the author wrote is scripture and that was the original reason for Textual Criticism, to get back to what the author wrote. I like what Dan Wallace said concerning the woman caught in adultery. He said something like “This is one of my favorite stories in the Bible that isn’t Bible”. Something like that. If I find the quote
-
If you want the Daily study bible (NT) on the computer and don't mind using another program there is an e-Sword module that can be downloaded from here: http://e-sword-users.org/users/node/95 e-Sword is free but I think you need the older version (8 or older) to view the DSB. If you want this and don’t have the older version of e-Sword post a request
-
[quote user="David B Phillips"] While Logos can't do all that yet, you can easily "turn the pages" of a book by pressing the space bar. This will advance the text one screen length. It's a great way to read and not have to continually scroll. Just set the zoom to a comfortable level (as Robert mentioned), then click space to advance! [/quote] Thanks
-
I am convicted that this section is not scripture and I would not preach it but if a person was going to preach it I would hope they would make the congregation aware that it is not part of the Bible but “might” be a historical event. I personally think if it “might” be historical and it was not original to the New Testament we have no reason to preach