Logos 9 Monograph Reading plans need to be implemented to all resources

I have previously requested the Logos 9 Monograph reading plans should be implemented to those monographs where you changed the type. Example is church history. Turns out in practice I read chapters in all books and in segments in Logos Mobile Education. The Logos 9 Monograph reading plan should be available in all resources.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

MJ. Smith

Sorry but I don't understand -- what do you mean by "monograph reading plan"? I can make reading plans on autobiographies et. al. so I am missing something.

Rosie Perera

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1213523#Comment_1213523

Sorry but I don't understand -- what do you mean by "monograph reading plan"? I can make reading plans on autobiographies et. al. so I am missing something.

He's talking about the "Chapter Reading Plans" that were implemented for monographs for Logos 9.

https://wiki.logos.com/Reading_Plan_$28Basics$29#Starting_a_Chapter_Reading_Plan

These don't work in any of the new types that were created when monographs were reassigned to a bunch of new types.

Agreed. They should work for many of those new types. Church History is indeed one that it should work for, but doesn't.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1213528#Comment_1213528

He's talking about the "Chapter Reading Plans" that were implemented for monographs for Logos 9.

Thanks, Rosie. Now I understand. I have added a comment to Improved Reading Plan Generation | Faithlife on feedback so that it covers this request. Everyone, please jump in and vote.

Beloved Amodeo

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1213577#Comment_1213577

He's talking about the "Chapter Reading Plans" that were implemented for monographs for Logos 9.

Thanks, Rosie. Now I understand. I have added a comment to Improved Reading Plan Generation | Faithlife on feedback so that it covers this request. Everyone, please jump in and vote.

I have voted in support, but I think this and the original issue needs more emphasis, to that end I will post a separate thread and reference this thread.