Data BUG (LHB-CA): Lergameh/Paseq indistinction

Reuben Helmuth
Reuben Helmuth MVP Posts: 2,485
in Beta Desktop App Forum

Here's another problem that's covered in the Resolving Ambiguities section, yet all occurrences of either one are tagged with both, making it impossible to do reliable searches.

Diagnostic Logs 

Comments

  • Rick Brannan (Logos)
    Rick Brannan (Logos) Member, Logos Employee Posts: 1,862

    Hi Reuben.

    This one is a little more complicated from my perspective.

    When you say "legarmeh", you mean in prose the "Munah Legarmeh", and in poetry the "Mahpakh Legarmeh", correct?

    So, in prose, when a Munah Legarmeh also has Munnach and Paseq annotated, the Munnach and Paseq need to be removed (but Munah Legarmeh persists).

    Similarly, in poetry, when a Mahpahk Legarmeh has Mahpahk and Paseq annotated, the Mahpahk and Paseq need to be removed (but Mahpahk Legarmeh persists).

    Is this correct?

    Rick Brannan
    Data Wrangler, Faithlife
    My books in print

  • Reuben Helmuth
    Reuben Helmuth MVP Posts: 2,485
    https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1034936#Comment_1034936

    Rick, you're right that this one is a bit more complicated. According to Helmut Richter, it's impossible to ascertain which it is without looking at the words themselves.

     

    Rick Brannan (Faithlife) said:

    When you say "legarmeh", you mean in prose the "Munah Legarmeh", and in poetry the "Mahpakh Legarmeh", correct?

    Yes.

    Rick Brannan (Faithlife) said:

    So, in prose, when a Munah Legarmeh also has Munnach and Paseq annotated, the Munnach and Paseq need to be removed (but Munah Legarmeh persists).

    This is correct, with the caveat that only if it's been correctly tagged as Munah Legarmeh.

    Diagnostic Logs 

Categories