BUG: Garbage results in results

Superset in sense fails to find the "this sense" i.e. the sense specified.

Comparing the results to show the problem is strictly the omission of "this term":

Search argument	Search rule	Results
<sense = tent>	Finds exactly this sense	348 results in 315 verses
<sense ~ tent>	Finds this sense and all narrower senses	363 results in 328 verses	15 results from narrower senses
<sense subset tent>	Finds this sense and all narrower senses	363 results in 328 verses	15 results from narrower senses
<sense intersect tent>	Finds this sense and all narrower and broader senses	502 results in 439 verses	139 results from broader senses
<sense superset tent>	Finds this sense and all broader senses	139 results in 117 verses	Omits “this sense” – should have 487 results

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Graham Criddle

I'm trying to understand what the superset search (when used with sense) is supposed to do. Where did you get your definitions?

The first superset result relates to jewelry and doesn't seem to have any relationship to tents at all.

How do you see the relationships being intended to work here?

Bradley Grainger (Logos)

Superset in sense fails to find the "this sense" i.e. the sense specified.

This will be fixed in an upcoming release.

Bradley Grainger (Logos)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1139675#Comment_1139675

The first superset result relates to jewelry and doesn't seem to have any relationship to tents at all.

That word is tagged as <Sense object>, which is an ancestor sense of <Sense tent>, so it's correct for it to be included in search results. (Whether it should be <Sense object> rather than <Sense jewelry> is another matter.)

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1139703#Comment_1139703

That word is tagged as <Sense object>, which is an ancestor sense of <Sense tent>, so it's correct for it to be included in search results. (Whether it should be <Sense object> rather than <Sense jewelry> is another matter.)

Thanks Bradley

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1139675#Comment_1139675

Where did you get your definitions?

Bible Senses

Senses are indivisible units of meaning as defined by the Bible Sense Lexicon dataset. Each word in the Bible has been assigned a sense, which can be concorded using the Sense data type.

For example, <Sense to cure> finds various places where curing happens. But “to heal” is a type of curing as well.

• <Sense ~ to cure> or <Sense to cure> or <Sense subset to cure> — F— finds this sense and all narrower senses
• <Sense superset to cure> inds this sense and all broader senses
• <Sense intersects to cure> — inds this sense and all narrower or broader senses
• <Sense = to cure> — Finds exactly this sense

The easiest way to specify a Sense term is to type a word into the Search box and choose a Sense term from the drop-down term suggestion list, or to right-click a word in a reverse interlinear Bible and choose the Sense term from the right side of the Context menu.

Complete with at least 3 typos!!!

The superset set should give me an upward hierarchy such as physical object --> human construction --> shelter --> portable shelter . . . but I was very unimpressed by the content of the Bible Sense Lexicon in this case ... so many empty entries as to make me question the classification.

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1139724#Comment_1139724

Thanks MJ