I got several of the "not Responding messages when I began a search, then I got a "Run Time Error" dialogue, then the crash. Logos4 log is attached. There was no crash log generated. Diagnostic logging is enabled on my machine.
2480.Logos4.log
There is no crash information in the log, although there are some "interesting" time gaps in syntax searches.
Please upload an image of the search you were attempting.
This is the search I ran. I ran it on all passages in the NT last night and that is when I had the problems described above. I built it again this morning and ran it first on just the epistle I was studying. It ran fine. I expanded the search to the Pauline epistles with no problems. I then expanded to all passages and it ran fine.
I have to think that this is all tied to the B7 performance issues that have been discussed in several other threads.
Fred, that's a very 'ugly' search with potential to cause a hernia on any computer[:)]
There's no boundary for the 'anything' so it could search the whole database for a matching SC and the output reflects the distance between matcheseg.
Lk 6:42 (PC) - Act 13:15 (SC)
Act 1:16 (PC) - Act 13:15 (SC)
Act 2:29 (PC) - Act 13:15 (SC)
.....
There are only 4 SC in the database (Act 13:15, 2 Cor 1:5, Phil 2:1, 1 Thess 2:3) and 99 PC. I don't think you can derive anything meaningful from this query. What were you trying to achieve?
Fred, that's a very 'ugly' search with potential to cause a hernia on any computer There's no boundary for the 'anything' so it could search the whole database for a matching SC and the output reflects the distance between matcheseg. Lk 6:42 (PC) - Act 13:15 (SC) Act 1:16 (PC) - Act 13:15 (SC) Act 2:29 (PC) - Act 13:15 (SC) ..... There are only 4 SC in the database (Act 13:15, 2 Cor 1:5, Phil 2:1, 1 Thess 2:3) and 99 PC. I don't think you can derive anything meaningful from this query. What were you trying to achieve?
Fred, that's a very 'ugly' search with potential to cause a hernia on any computer
I was basing it on 2 Thess. 2:1-3. In the OpenText clause analysis it shows verse 1 as the PC with the addressee (brethren or brothers) and verse three as a SC with the subject exhortation. I was trying to find other clauses that had same addressee and the same subject.
What would you recommend to make it "more attractive".
What would you recommend to make it "more attractive"
We need to force a sequence of PC followed by related SC's, one of which is the exhortation clause. Hence the inserted SC which may occur 0 to 5 times.
The only result is 1 Thess 2:1-3 (I'm sure you didn't mean 2 Thess).
What would you recommend to make it "more attractive" We need to force a sequence of PC followed by related SC's, one of which is the exhortation clause. Hence the inserted SC which may occur 0 to 5 times. The only result is 1 Thess 2:1-3 (I'm sure you didn't mean 2 Thess).
Got it. You taught me something again. Thanks Dave
Yes I did mean 1 Thessalonians. Initially I had inserted three SC's but and it only returned the passage in 1 Thessalonians. I thought I might be restricting my search too much by specifying that absolute number of SC's.
One more question. The SC clause that you inserted to repeat 0-5 times. Obviously I could set that to any range I wanted to. Would I have to restrict it to a secondary clause or would the search work if I just specified a "clause" without identifying a level?
One more question. The SC clause that you inserted to repeat 0-5 times. Obviously I could set that to any range I wanted to.
The 0 is important as it allows the exhortation to immediately follow the PC. The maximum value sets a boundary for the search.
Would I have to restrict it to a secondary clause or would the search work if I just specified a "clause" without identifying a level?
Just try it...
I actually removed all of the clause level specifications and returned an additional verse in 2 Thessalonians as well. Thanks again for you help.
Just try it... I actually removed all of the clause level specifications and returned an additional verse in 2 Thessalonians as well. Thanks again for you help.
But is it meaningful? Are there other results for these words?
I did a Morph Search lemma:ἀδελφός BEFORE lemma:παράκλησις and picked up Acts 13:15 & Heb 13:22, which are single verse results.
Then I used a Basic Search <lemma = lbs/el/ἀδελφός> BEFORE 40 words <lemma = lbs/el/παράκλησις> which is not limited by verse boundaries and picked up the Syntax results + others. Now you have to decide whether a Syntax search will yield more meaningful results or if this search is sufficient!
