Some inconsistencies in the Lexham Context Commentary

Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
This post has 3 Replies | 1 Follower

Posts 25583
Forum MVP
Dave Hooton | Forum Activity | Posted: Thu, May 21 2020 7:57 PM

Concerning "Rapture vs "Second Coming"

The Commentary does not commit to a "Rapture" doctrine. However:

  • The parallel passages between Mark and Luke state "Second Coming" but Lk 17:34-36 states "rapture"
  • The Exhortations from Paul (1 Thess 4:1-5:28) states "Second coming" but "Rapture" is used in Awaiting the Lord's Coming (2 Thess 1:1 - 3:18) and in the heading for 2 Thess 2:1-12.

Dave
===

Windows 10 & Android 8

Posts 7066
DAL | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, May 21 2020 8:45 PM

Well, that can serve as the rupture of the rapture theory — Its inconsistency, that is 😂 👍😁👌

DAL

Posts 3719
Mattillo | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, May 21 2020 8:50 PM

Maybe they’ll fix that when they find their John manuscript :)

 Last I heard was Q2 I believe

Posts 7066
DAL | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, May 21 2020 9:00 PM

Mattillo:

Maybe they’ll fix that when they find their John manuscript :)

 Last I heard was Q2 I believe

Technically the Q2 ends the last day of June 😂

Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS