I know there have been several threads dealing with note files, but I have a specific question that I don't recall seeing discussed--i.e. if there are pros and/or cons to keeping your actual text notes in separate files from your highlighting notes.
To clarify... the threads I've read often focus on the pros & cons of having a separate notes file for each monograph (or perhaps one file for each book of the Bible and related Bible commentaries) VS. having fewer notes files. But I'm wondering about any pros and cons that might be worth keeping in mind when considering whether or not to keep all highlighting notes in the same files as actual text notes.
For Example
Let's say I'm reading a couple of commentaries on Genesis. My past approach has been to keep a Genesis notes file of my making for my actual text notes as I read through the commentaries, and since both commentaries are dealing with the book of Genesis, my notes from both go in the same Genesis notes file. But I allowed my highlighting to go to the default Highlight notes files that Logos creates. So all of "my" Genesis notes are in "my" Genesis notes file and all of my highlights in the commentaries are in Logos' default notes file for the Highlighting style I happened to use.
After reading some of the other threads, I got the impression many/most people keep both Highlight notes and actual text notes in the same notes file, so I started the painful process of locating all my highlighting notes and moving them to the appropriate files housing my textual notes. But I'm wondering if it's worth the effort. I.e. are there long-term technical/system performance factors that will benefit from keeping them together? Are there organizational/methodological processes that will benefit from keeping them together? Any other factors to consider?