I am starting to find that the limitations of using Logos compared to the way I'd use books relate to screen space or resolution. The screen shot below is my attempt to study the bible "medieval style" with as many[1] (relevant) commentaries open surrounding the resource as is possible. (It's using Logos as a kind of ultimate "anti sola scriptura" tool
.) In the same way, in the olden days, I'd take all of the relevant books down from the book shelf and open them all over the floor/desk (balancing heavy weights in the middle to keep them open).
However, you'll see from the screen shot below that whilst the bible text in the middle of the screen is legible, most of the other commentaries are not, and require me to keep adjusting the panels so that I can view one or another commentary sensibly, which detracts from quickly flicking my eyes from one text to another.

My question is whether people have found using screen projectors to project on to a wall or other surface to be capable of generating something more akin to a typical desk space, or whether people use multiple monitors, and how effective this mode of studying is? I guess I could decrease the screen resolution, but I don't think my eyesight will hold out for much longer...!
[1] Yes, I know there are some duplicate commentaries open here. That was before I discovered that where a two-part commentary exists, Logos will automatically default to the correct commentary when the commentary is linked to the text. In any case, I have even more commentaries than are open here...