Spelling of appearance

Tom Reynolds

There are several instances in the Lexham LXX materials where appearance is misspelled as appearence. This is in both the Analytical Lexicon and the LXX interlinear translation. The former I can submit a report typo for but I can't seem to be able to do that for the interlinear text. It looks like the same is true for the Logos LXX so you need to make some systemic corrections. I see that the hover for Swete's LXX is showing Strong's 7200: "appearence, vision, appearance." Perhaps these are all tied together somehow.

Rick Brannan (Logos)

I'll report this. Thanks.

Tom Reynolds

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/992491#Comment_992491

Thanks Rick,

I look forward the coming appearance of the corrections

Rosie Perera

This is a common typo, apparently. There are 101 appearances of it in my library. I'm not going to bother going through and reporting them all. But searching/reporting such common typos, once a single reported instance suggests there might be more, should be something that could be automated.

Bruce Dunning

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/992674#Comment_992674

Rosie Perera said:

This is a common typo, apparently. There are 101 appearances of it in my library.

I would have thought the publishers would have used spell-check to catch errors like this but I guess not. It made me wonder if it was a variation of spelling that is acceptable in some countries but I don't believe that it is.