SUGGESTION: MIA which shouldn't be - reverse interlinears
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68e16/68e16762a635d08b33c97ae9eb4a1c3ead3b2090" alt="MJ. Smith"
MJ. Smith
MVP Posts: 54,482
In documenting the reverse interlinears, something that FL has allowed to slide since their last push on documentation, I discovered two very annoying instances of missing data:
- The ESV has a reverse interlinear but its apocrypha does not. This is most annoying as the ESV is preferred to the RSV, NRSV among some Protestants. It's easier to have cross-denominational discussions when one is able to use the others translation.
- The D-R lacks a reverse interlinear attached to the Vulgate. Especially when the Vulgate interlinear lacks a literal translation (this doesn't bother me but was brought up recently in the forums.) But having our primary Vulgate translation aligned with the Vulgate is critical.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
Tagged:
0
Comments
-
Good points.[Y]
0