This is almost a spin off of the "Favorite Commentaries" discussion at: http://community.logos.com/forums/p/9831/77794.aspx#77794
I would like to take it a step further though. At this time, I don't have and can't afford a lot of the multi-volume commentaries mentioned in the above thread. I am curious as to how you would/do prioritize your commentaries if you have/only had Scholar's edition and only use the commentaries that are available in it. I have a couple that I have bought extra (for specific epistles and books) but want to optimize and use my library with commentaries that are a part of the Scholar's package as well. Admittedly, with the exception of my first choice, I have prioritized a few with no methodical rhyme, reason or knowledge of why I put them in the order that I did.
So in short, if you don't mind me dwelling in your business, if you just had Scholar's, what would your prioritization look like for your commentaries?
Thanks in advance.