OpenText.org Clauses fixed

Tim Bahula

Yeah! I just noticed that several errors that I had reported in 2008 (and Dave Hooton before me) in OpenText.org Clauses have been fixed. Haven't had time to check them all, but hope springs eternal.

Dave Hooton

Yeah! I just noticed that several errors that I had reported in 2008 (and Dave Hooton before me) in OpenText.org Clauses have been fixed.

I noted a few (eg. Luke 12:1 μυριάς had been re-classified from a noun to an adjective) but it would be great if Logos would comment on the changes made!

Rick Brannan (Logos)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/16220#Comment_16220

Yeah! I just noticed that several errors that I had reported in 2008 (and Dave Hooton before me) in OpenText.org Clauses have been fixed.

I noted a few (eg. Luke 12:1 μυριάς had been re-classified from a noun to an adjective) but it would be great if Logos would comment on the changes made!

Because of several issues, in Logos4 we are using the Logos Bible Software morphology as the morphology (and lemmas) behind the OpenText.org annotation. We are also using our own implementation of Louw-Nida references, so they should all be disambiguated (instead of OpenText.org's pre-populatation by lemma).

The Logos Bible Software Greek NT morphology is at present undergoing a significant proofing/revision as part of the work on the new Lexham Syntax Graphs of the Greek New Testament, so the morphology will likely change again, though I'm unsure of when it will bubble down to OpenText.org, Lexham SGNT, LGNTI, Lexham Analytical Lexicon of the NT, and the morph GNTs using UBS/NA as a textual basis (including items like the Lexham Clausal Outlines, Lexham Discourse Greek NT, etc.).

Tim Bahula

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/16348#Comment_16348

Because of several issues, in Logos4 we are using the Logos Bible Software morphology as the morphology (and lemmas) behind the OpenText.org annotation.

Which is why the morphological stuff is modified but why the syntactic structures are not. [:'(]

 

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/16348#Comment_16348

Because of several issues, in Logos4 we are using the Logos Bible Software morphology as the morphology (and lemmas) behind the OpenText.org annotation.

Thanks Rick as the "several" morphological issues appear to have been fixed eg. the 34 erroneous Indeclinables in Romans, the 2285 errors for εἰμί, τίς is no longer a Personal Pronoun and it has fixed the lemmas for εἶδον, εἰδὼς. The disambiguated LN assignments are a great improvement and previous erroneous assignments have been fixed.

I would echo with Tim that the next step is to fix the clausal elements.