PLEASE!!!! Alphabetize Metadata
Please give us the option to alphabetize our metadata instead of having it by number of hits. My brain doesn't work that way.
Comments
-
I'm surprised they're still doing 'hits'. I'm on L7, keeping an eye on whether any value upgrading (works fine now). On the web-version, of course it's hits. I was looking for a specific type and had to slowly scan the whole list.
But it illustrates their curious logic. I remember when they said notes should be like in the margin on your Bible. Of course, the location-find on maps eluded them too. They don't think too long, before coding.
0 -
David Taylor Jr said:
Please give us the option to alphabetize our metadata instead of having it by number of hits. My brain doesn't work that way.
Train your brain [:P] I'm joking, of course, but there is a reason they are traditionally in the number of occurrences order -- not all facets are shown initially so the facets most apt to be used are presented initially. As long as all facet lists have a search function, this works well. If there is no search function, it does not. That being said, I agree that an alphabetic sort order is also need for cases where one may not remember the precise word or for petrified brains.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0
