Citation consistency

Christian Alexander
Christian Alexander Member Posts: 3,008 ✭✭
edited November 21 in English Forum

Sometimes books published by Eerdmans are misnamed in citations as Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company or William B. Eerdmans, or just Eerdmans. What is the correct citation style for Chicago Manual of Style?

Tagged:

Comments

  • Dave Hooton
    Dave Hooton Member, MVP Posts: 35,672 ✭✭✭

    Then there is  W.B. Eerdmans, Wm. B. Eerdmans, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, William B. Eerdmans Company, William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co., Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.,  W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co., W.B. Eerdmans Pub.; Apollos, William B. Eerdmans Publishing; Paternoster Press, W.B. Eerdmans; Paternoster Press,

    Dave
    ===

    Windows 11 & Android 13

  • MJ. Smith
    MJ. Smith Member, MVP Posts: 53,072 ✭✭✭✭✭

    misnamed in citations

    Generally, this metadata is supplied by the publisher ... when they are inconsistent over time, one would expect the citation built to be inconsistent as well. IIRC the correct form is the one used by the publisher in that particular edition.

    Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."

  • Christian Alexander
    Christian Alexander Member Posts: 3,008 ✭✭

    I understand and see what you all are saying. Is there a general rule? Like for WB Eerdmans use just plain "Eerdmans". For Baker Publishing Group use "Baker". For Zondervan Publishing House use "Zondervan." Would that be an incorrect way of doing citations? Does Chicago Manual of Style have a listing for these publishers? 

  • Dave Hooton
    Dave Hooton Member, MVP Posts: 35,672 ✭✭✭

    Does Chicago Manual of Style have a listing for these publishers? 

    The style only defines what info is to be included in the citation, and the way it is formatted. The publisher info is based on what it is given for that book, but  here is an excerpt from https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/book/ed17/part3/ch14/toc.html


    The Chicago Manual of Style Online

    • Publisher’s Name
    • 14.133 Preferred form of publisher’s name
    • 14.134 Abbreviations and omissible parts of a publisher’s name
    • 14.135 “And” or ampersand in publisher’s name
    • 14.136 Non-English publishers’ names
    • 14.137 Self-published or privately published books
    • 14.138 Parent companies, imprints, and such
    • 14.139 Special academic imprints and joint imprints
    • 14.140 Copublication
    • 14.141 Distributed books

    You have to sign-in to get further details.

    But you could use the Publisher metadata in Library. type publisher:eerdman in Library Find box. You might get away with Eerdmans and then Zondervan as abbreviations.

    Dave
    ===

    Windows 11 & Android 13

  • Rosie Perera
    Rosie Perera Member Posts: 26,202 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I understand and see what you all are saying. Is there a general rule? Like for WB Eerdmans use just plain "Eerdmans". For Baker Publishing Group use "Baker". For Zondervan Publishing House use "Zondervan." Would that be an incorrect way of doing citations? Does Chicago Manual of Style have a listing for these publishers? 

    As long as you are consistent within your own writing, I doubt it makes much difference. I tend to use the shorted commonly understood form of the publisher's name. So just Eerdmans, Zondervan. But if it's a university press, like Cambridge University Press, I write it all out. I don't know why I break my personal rule on that. Just be consistent yourself and nobody is going to even notice.