Bug with Septuagint SESB Resource

Hi!

I recently updated Verbum to version 31.2.31 and since then the LXX SESB resource does not work correctly in textual and morphological searches. This is a problem that I have noticed in other colleagues.

Is this something that will be fixed in a future update or is there any other way to solve it?

Thank in advance!

Find more posts tagged with

Desktop App

Comments

Graham Criddle

Hi Andrés - and welcome to the forums

LXX SESB resource

I'm not sure which resource you are referring to - can you provide a link to it on the Verbum store please?

does not work correctly in textual and morphological searches.

Please provide more details of what is not working correctly including screenshots showing the searches that are not returning expected results (use the paperclip icon in the forum editor to upload screenshots)

Graham

Andrés CASTELLANO

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1285319#Comment_1285319

Good afternoon, thank you for your quick response.
The resource I am referring to is Rahlfs Septuagint edition:

When I try to do a search for the morphological recurrences of a lemma, it appears as if none exist. When doing the same search in the Septuagint Swete's edition, more than 60 recurrences appear:

And placing Swete's edition of the Septuagint as the preferred Bible (prioritization of books), when performing a biblical word study, recurrences do appear in the Old Testament (LXX), but if the prioritized book is the Rahlfs edition, under the same circumstances no OT (LXX) recurrences appear:

This is something that did not happen before. I have previously performed searches in the Greek text of the Rahlfs edition and it worked correctly.

Thank you very much for your attention and I hope that the problem can be solved.

Wolfgang Schneider

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1285328#Comment_1285328

Could it be that the LXX SESB Edition is not morphologically tagged? I have a different LXX edition by Rahlfs in my library which may have replaced the SESB edition (see screenshot)

Andrés CASTELLANO

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1285332#Comment_1285332

Yes, I know that version too, but the problem is that the other version, the one I use, until now had functionalities that no longer work.
Thanks anyway, Mr. Schneider

DMB

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1285332#Comment_1285332

Could it be that the LXX SESB Edition is not morphologically tagged?

It's morph-tagged. But the lemma disappeared (popups and right-click). Updated 1-9-24 (LXXSESB.logos4)

My other Rahlfs from 1996 (GBS) works fine.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1285336#Comment_1285336

It's morph-tagged. But the lemma disappeared (popups and right-click). Updated 1-9-24 (LXXSESB.logos4)

has this been reported as a bug?

DMB

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1285344#Comment_1285344

No ... just researching this post. Initially, it locked up my Verbum (right-clicking a morph). I assumed 'Bug' on the front was sufficient but maybe not.

Andrew Batishko

Thanks for the report. Our content team is taking a look at the problem.

NB.Mick

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1285336#Comment_1285336

Could it be that the LXX SESB Edition is not morphologically tagged?

It's morph-tagged. But the lemma disappeared (popups and right-click). Updated 1-9-24 (LXXSESB.logos4)

I can confirm that strangely there is no lemma in the context menu, thus the search that explicitly looks for a lemma will fail. Maybe they broke it with the last update. However: when I run the morph search on the lemma without explicitly requesting that it is a lemma, the search will find all forms: