Matthew Henry’s commentaries on whole Bible vs concise version

First post, sorry if the question has been asked and answered
I have both commentaries on whole Bible and concise version, but I noticed concise version doesn’t sound from unabridged version. They seem different in content . IE I couldn’t find content in concise editio in unabridged version
is this true or I jus need check more
Thanks
Comments
-
Welcome, William!
Does this help any: https://community.logos.com/forums/t/87379.aspx
They appear to have separate goals.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
Thanks. Yes, I saw it through googling
i guess my question is did Matthew Henry write both? I don’t think he wrote two versions. But if not, who wrote concise version
I am concerned whether someone wrote concise version in Matthew Henry’s name
0 -
William said:
i guess my question is did Matthew Henry write both? I don’t think he wrote two versions. But if not, who wrote concise version
Henry, M., & Scott, T. (1997). Matthew Henry’s Concise Commentary. Logos Research Systems. i.e. re-written by Thomas Scott
Henry, M. (1994). Matthew Henry’s commentary on the whole Bible: complete and unabridged in one volume. Hendrickson.
New Modern Edition Database copyright © 1991, 1994 Hendrickson Publishers, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved.Dave
===Windows 11 & Android 13
0 -
Thanks Dave. Now everything makes sense! I actually like concise version, but seems need go back to unabridged edition first . thanks again
0