Matthew Henry’s commentaries on whole Bible vs concise version

First post, sorry if the question has been asked and answered

I have both commentaries on whole Bible and concise version, but I noticed concise version doesn’t sound from unabridged version. They seem different in content . IE I couldn’t find content in concise editio in unabridged version

is this true or I jus need check more

Thanks

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

DMB

Welcome, William!

Does this help any: https://community.logos.com/forums/t/87379.aspx

They appear to have separate goals.

William

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1310697#Comment_1310697

Thanks. Yes, I saw it through googling

i guess my question is did Matthew Henry write both? I don’t think he wrote two versions. But if not, who wrote concise version

I am concerned whether someone wrote concise version in Matthew Henry’s name

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1310698#Comment_1310698

i guess my question is did Matthew Henry write both? I don’t think he wrote two versions. But if not, who wrote concise version

Henry, M., & Scott, T. (1997). Matthew Henry’s Concise Commentary. Logos Research Systems. i.e. re-written by Thomas Scott

Henry, M. (1994). Matthew Henry’s commentary on the whole Bible: complete and unabridged in one volume. Hendrickson.
New Modern Edition Database copyright © 1991, 1994 Hendrickson Publishers, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

William

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1311685#Comment_1311685

Thanks Dave. Now everything makes sense! I actually like concise version, but seems need go back to unabridged edition first . thanks again