BUG: Missing option footnote symbol at Visual Filters in Elberfelder Bibel 1985
Kurt Garbe
Member Posts: 113 ✭✭
In my screenshot is compared the Elberfelder Bible 2006 and the Elberfelder Bible 1985, including the setting options of the visual filter, to show that the settings in Elberfelder 2006 are the standard function (such as in all Bibles with footnotes), and that in the Elberfelder 1985 the option Footnote symbol is missing.
The footnotes of the Elberfelder 1985 are practically unusable when "One verse per line" is selected. This is a clear disadvantage compared to the standard.
In order to meaningfully compare Bibles verse by verse, "One verse per line" including footnote symbols must be visible.
I also need that in the Elberfelder Bible 1985.
I would be grateful if this could be done soon.
The footnotes of the Elberfelder 1985 are practically unusable when "One verse per line" is selected. This is a clear disadvantage compared to the standard.
In order to meaningfully compare Bibles verse by verse, "One verse per line" including footnote symbols must be visible.
I also need that in the Elberfelder Bible 1985.
I would be grateful if this could be done soon.
Tagged:
3
Comments
-
Here is a screenshot from the Elberfelder Bible 1985:
In this screenshot you can see the missing footnote indicators for ONE VERSE PER LINE on the left side.
On the right side without ONE VERSE PER LINE you can see the footnote indicators,
which should not disappear even with ONE VERSE PER LINE.0