Add "Three Vertical Tiles" quick layout option

The new version Logos 9 and at least one former version do not show 3 columns/panes in the LAYOUTS. When I have only 3 books having been opened and then click LAYOUT icon, it shows 3 columns/panes. But if I have more books having been opened, it shows more than 3 columns/panes. If I have 25 books having been opened, there will be 25 little square panes. I have to move these little panes to result in 3 columns. This is wasting my time.

Find more posts tagged with

Submitted

Desktop App

Status: None

Comments

Kee Lau

Here I would add my attachment for more than 3 books having been opened.

96ca3ae488eb03a937f5efb628551d1c53e7affb_1T2.png

MJ. Smith

I can't find anything to indicate that its behavior has changed. Have you verified that this is not a bug by asking for help in the forums?

bradley.grainger

The tooltip for the "Three Columns" icon is "Vertical", so it's currently working as designed: to put all the open tiles in a vertical-first orientation. I've renamed your feedback item to suggest adding a new quick layout.

Kee Lau

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1336013#Comment_1336013

@mjespuiva-86
I think I need to make clear my point. See attachment. In case the red words in the attachment is not clear, here I re-type them--
(1) Now there are 2 columns (or vertical tiles). But I want to have 3 columns. So I click this icon (that shows 3 columns).
(2) After clicking that icon, there are now 16 tiles (or panes). So this is not what I want.
So I believe that there is a bug, and thus I hope Logos can fix this bug. Thanks.

c158edb120f6e95f2f4b60baf5355399e85c4bcf_1t6.png

Kee Lau

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1336015#Comment_1336015

@bradley-grainger Please see my reply to MJ Smith.

bradley.grainger

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1336015#Comment_1336015

@keethlau144-26 It's _not_ a "Three Columns" command, it's a "Vertical" command. (See the tooltip for the icon.) So it's currently functioning as designed. This isn't a bug; you're making a suggestion for new functionality, and I've edited your suggestion correspondingly.