BWS wishes

Ken McGuire

First of all, I must say that the standard reports have improved greatly since Beta 1.  However, I do have a few issues.

I was looking at our lesson for next week (Amos 5) and tried to do a BWS on "Bethel".  When I do this from the NRSV, it gives me the Lemma window and NRSV Translation window.  The rest of the sections are greyed out except for Textual Searches which says 0 hits in 0 verses.

So I tried it from LHI.  It gives me three Lemma options - the prefixed preposition, Beth, and El.  While there is more than a little legitimacy to this, it doesn't exactly let me look for what I wanted.  When I ran a BWS on Beth, all the sections worked, but not on the compound word.

In addition, I would like it if the BWS report could include more information from Ancient Manuscripts.  Hebrew only looks at biblical references for me, and I have the Hebrew/Cananite Inscriptions.  Greek doesn't include the Pseudepigrapha or the Illiad.

By the way, all the Ugaritic texts are listed as type:Monograph instead of Ancient Manuscript.  I personally would love to see results from this included in BWS as well.

Ken  McGuire

Ken McGuire

With B6, when I do a BWS on Bethel, the information provided is still less than ideal.  Am I alone with my concerns?

To the above, I would also like it if BWS on Aramaic terms would include biblical references instead of just the Targums.

Ken McGuire

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/19308#Comment_19308

v3 BWS splits the word for its "textual" search and you get many results. Still, you wonder how L4 gets 72 results for its graphs when the suggested lemma search gets zero.

Robert Pavich

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/19433#Comment_19433

Still, you wonder how L4 gets 72 results for its graphs when the suggested lemma search gets zero.

I thought that bug was squashed!

 

Back to the drawing board.