Public post makes mention of v 4

Jacob Hantla

A public post http://community.logos.com/forums/t/2420.aspx on ISBNs makes mention of v4. Should this post be moved out of the general area?

Bob Pritchett

Thanks for pointing this out. I'm going to leave it up for now -- it looks like a 3.0 question that asks something speculative about v4, which I'm sure everyone sees as inevitable. I don't think it especially hints at 4.0 being close.

TCBlack

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/18418#Comment_18418

Hopefully my response to said post is dismissive enough.  I had to think about my wording carefully so as not to be deceptive.  [:)]

Ted Hans

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/18797#Comment_18797

Thomas Black said:

Hopefully my response to said post is dismissive enough.  I had to think about my wording carefully so as not to be deceptive. 

You did well.[;)][Y]

Ted