Public post makes mention of v 4

Jacob Hantla · October 2009

A public post http://community.logos.com/forums/t/2420.aspx on ISBNs makes mention of v4. Should this post be moved out of the general area?

Bob Pritchett · October 2009

Thanks for pointing this out. I'm going to leave it up for now -- it looks like a 3.0 question that asks something speculative about v4, which I'm sure everyone sees as inevitable. I don't think it especially hints at 4.0 being close.

TCBlack · October 2009

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/18418#Comment_18418

Hopefully my response to said post is dismissive enough. I had to think about my wording carefully so as not to be deceptive. [:)]

Ted Hans · October 2009

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/18797#Comment_18797

Thomas Black said:

Hopefully my response to said post is dismissive enough. I had to think about my wording carefully so as not to be deceptive.

You did well.[;)][Y]

Ted

Public post makes mention of v 4

Comments

Categories