Why doesn't the detail show the 16:16 reference that is shown elsewhere? Showing 16:1 rather than 16:16 is not helpful.
This is because the label for that figure of speech covers the entire chapter, not just verse 16.
That doesn't make sense as the coding is supposedly that of Bullinger whose reference to chapter 16 in the article on Hypocatastasis referenced the chapter as a contrast not as an instance.
Matt. 15:26.—“It is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it to dogs.” Here, the Lord Jesus, did not say to the woman of Canaan, Thou art a dog of the Gentiles (which would have been Metaphor), but He left out all reference to her, and only referred to her by implication, substituting a “dog” for herself. The woman, unlike the disciples (in chap. 16), at once saw and understood what the Lord implied, viz., that it was not meet to take that which belonged to Israel and give it to a Gentile (or a dog of a Gentile as they were called by the Jews), “And she said, Truth, Lord.” What she felt is clear: “It is quite true; Thou art perfectly right; I called Thee ‘the Son of David,’ and deserved no answer; I pleaded for ‘help’ and said: ‘Lord, help me’; but I made no confession as to who the ‘me’ was: no acknowledgment of my unworthiness and unmeetness as ‘a dog of the Gentiles.’ ” “Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their master’s table. Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith.” So, it is “great faith” to understand what the Lord implied by the use of this beautiful figure, and it is “little faith” not to understand it! even though the former was spoken of a Gentile woman, and the latter of the apostles of the Lord. See also under Synecdoche and Meiosis.Ethelbert William Bullinger, Figures of Speech Used in the Bible (London; New York: Eyre & Spottiswoode; E. & J. B. Young & Co., 1898), 746.
Matt. 15:26.—“It is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it to dogs.” Here, the Lord Jesus, did not say to the woman of Canaan, Thou art a dog of the Gentiles (which would have been Metaphor), but He left out all reference to her, and only referred to her by implication, substituting a “dog” for herself. The woman, unlike the disciples (in chap. 16), at once saw and understood what the Lord implied, viz., that it was not meet to take that which belonged to Israel and give it to a Gentile (or a dog of a Gentile as they were called by the Jews), “And she said, Truth, Lord.” What she felt is clear: “It is quite true; Thou art perfectly right; I called Thee ‘the Son of David,’ and deserved no answer; I pleaded for ‘help’ and said: ‘Lord, help me’; but I made no confession as to who the ‘me’ was: no acknowledgment of my unworthiness and unmeetness as ‘a dog of the Gentiles.’ ” “Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their master’s table. Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith.” So, it is “great faith” to understand what the Lord implied by the use of this beautiful figure, and it is “little faith” not to understand it! even though the former was spoken of a Gentile woman, and the latter of the apostles of the Lord. See also under Synecdoche and Meiosis.
Ethelbert William Bullinger, Figures of Speech Used in the Bible (London; New York: Eyre & Spottiswoode; E. & J. B. Young & Co., 1898), 746.
Will you report it to the data team or should I create a new error report for them.
It appears there are two hypocatastasis labels labels present there. One covers the entire chapter of Mt 16, and the other covers Mt 16:12-16. Since we usually merge together overlapping references, I'm not surprised to see only the full chapter one displayed.
I have passed on the comment about the Mt 16 label, and I would expect that if that is removed, the other should show up as you expect.
If it isn't removed, I promise to throw a fit … not sure I can throw as far a Bellingham as I am in North Bend … but it is clearly a coding error.
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
As per the title, when I turn on Use Internet I can select to not download new books but not able to prevent Logos from sending my notes and highlights to their server. In order to download new books it appears I must sync my private data with their server which is a bummer. Is this even possible to have these stored ONLY…
Hi there, How do I find Aorist Indicatives in a Second Class Conditional Clause in the entire NT? Please let me know if this can be done within a search panel or if this needs to be done in a "syntax" search document. If so, please give me the criteria. Thank you, Joel
Both point to SAAS and a collection of Septuagint Bibles. One works, one doesn't. I added SAAS because using just the collection, it failed to find any bible reference, even the Göttingen volume it claimed the passage was not in.
Why? That is VERY DECEIVING , because setting this parameter to No implies no Internet usage is taking place. Why are you tracking us using DESKTOP app on our PCs that is supposed to be in OFFLINE mode Logos? Can you GIVE us TRULLY OFFLINE option where we can just download new content and load into Logos MANUALLY without…
Hi all, I'm reading the NIGTC for Luke 23:48, and the reference to Metzger 182 is confusing to me, it does not seem to relate to the topic or passage under discussion. Any help is appreciated: The crowds express their feelings by beating their breasts… a sign of repentance… One or two MSS and the Gospel of Peter 25 make…
