Integration of ChatGPT to logos bible software
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edc03/edc03918beb8422ee89c4e63ca26843d5a32f901" alt="Oscar Salinas Herdocia"
Please select 1-3 relevant tags below once you're finished.
How can our community help you? Replace this text with your question or discussion starter.
Comments
-
will logos consider integrating ChatGPT with the logos bible software fully ? As Apple has done with the most recent software updates . I know many pastors are skeptical , at the end of the day we need to use all technologies for our Biblical and Hebrew or Greek studies.
I use ChatGPT with logos daily and it’s an extremely powerful combination.Regards,
Pastor Oscar Salinas
0 -
Integrating third party software is an easy way to increase maintenance costs - you have to adjust to their changes. And for many of us, chatGPT is not the chatbot of choice - gemini, perplexity, magisterium, claude … are also contenders. I personally prefer that Logos wait until one of the products is a clear leader. But there certainly are others who agree with you.
and
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
"At the end of the day" is not really good logic. But quite common … my idea is inevitable.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
There will be no clear winner regarding LLMs (GhatGPT, Gemini, Claude, etc.…) anytime soon. Hopefully, a standard protocol will be developed for interacting with most LLMs. Logos could use this to more easily integrate with the LLM(s) of the user's choice. That's probably the best way to make this jump. An example of one right now is the Model Context Protocol (MCP). It's being developed by Anthropic (creator of Claude). The issue will be with getting adoption across the other LLMs. However, creating a translation layer (often referred to as a proxy or adapter) might be possible. Software Developers will be familiar with this approach.
0 -
A verbal interface for search would be awesome. A speech-to-text feature to enter the search criteria would work particularly well for entering an AI search, since it requires a less rigid syntax than other searches. I use this feature on my phone to conduct Google searches. Speech-to-text software is much more advanced and reliable than LLMs at this point.
0