Inconsistent tagging driving me nuts ...
In Charlesworth, James H. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha and the New Testament: Expansions of the “Old Testament” and Legends, Wisdom, and Philosophical Literature, Prayers, Psalms and Odes, Fragments of Lost Judeo-Hellenistic Works. Vol. 2. New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 1985. when a book is known only by fragments/quotations in other works, the quotation and its source were both listed as references for the passage. This works well for navigating the resources in Logos.
James, Montague Rhodes, ed. The Apocryphal New Testament: Being the Apocryphal Gospels, Acts, Epistles, and Apocalypses. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924. the quotation is shown in the text with the source reference, but the right click shows only one reference - that of the quoted text not its source. This would be (sort of) acceptable if the source in the text was a link but it is not. And the fragmentary apocryphal text reference is not unique. This results in the worst of all possible options (short of false data) for navigating the NT apocrypha. Please treat James in the same manner as you treated Charlesworth.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
Best Answer
-
Dear MJ, thank you for your report. We have have created a ticket to fix these bugs.
0
Comments
-
Dear MJ, thank you for your report. We have have created a ticket to fix these bugs.
0