BUG: Oxyrhynchus Papyrus 654, Oxyrhynchus Papyrus 1, Oxyrhynchus Papyrus 655 etc.

MJ. Smith
MJ. Smith MVP Posts: 53,878
edited January 13 in Resources Forum
  1. Why are these texts not tagged in James, Montague Rhodes, ed. The Apocryphal New Testament: Being the Apocryphal Gospels, Acts, Epistles, and Apocalypses. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924.

2. Similarly, why are the discourses under Coptic Lives without references?

3. And the prologue to NTApocrypha:"The Acts of Pilate" has no prologue designation …

4. Descent into Hell lacks versification and distinction between recensions.

5. Book of John the Evangelist lacks a datatype/milestone entirely.

6.The milestone NTApocrypha:"The Book of the Ressurection of Jesus Christ by Bartholomew the Apostle" is misspelled.

7. None of the Coptic text for The Assumption of the Virgin have milestones.

8. Assumption of the Virgin - Syriac texts - the text is not tagged

For all my complaints about the tagging I am very pleased with the intertext tagging and will have to practice using it.

Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."

Tagged:

Best Answer

  • Majo Diaz (Logos)
    Majo Diaz (Logos) Member, Logos Employee Posts: 77
    Answer ✓

    Dear MJ, thank you for your report. We have have created a ticket to fix these bugs.

Comments

  • Majo Diaz (Logos)
    Majo Diaz (Logos) Member, Logos Employee Posts: 77
    Answer ✓

    Dear MJ, thank you for your report. We have have created a ticket to fix these bugs.

Categories