Looking to discuss topics like Sola Scriptura, Sola fide, substitutionary atonement, Marian dogmas and anything else Christian theology related. My stance is Protestant.
Welcome to the Logos/Verbum forums .These forums are for discussing the use of software not theology, so you need to post your question elsewhere. However, you are likely to run into unforeseen difficulties as there are no Catholic doctrines that lack scripture support, essentially by definition.
@MJ. Smith Wellll…. I would think there are some that would disagree with you about there being "unforeseen difficulties as there are no Catholic doctrines that lack scripture support" That would be a good discussion that I would be glad to oblige you in. 😎
Me too. MJ often calls out people for posting theological statements, and the makes theological statements herself.
Ok if anyone would like to debate this topic message me on Reddit @u/AnSkootz
From ChatGPT:
Factual Statement: A factual statement is a claim that can be objectively proven true or false based on evidence or reality. These statements are verifiable and do not depend on personal beliefs or interpretationsTheological Statement: A theological statement expresses beliefs, doctrines, or interpretations about religious matters, often based on sacred texts or traditions. Such statements are rooted in faith, interpretation, and the framework of a particular religious tradition, and are not typically subject to empirical verification in the same way as factual statements
Factual Statement: A factual statement is a claim that can be objectively proven true or false based on evidence or reality. These statements are verifiable and do not depend on personal beliefs or interpretations
Theological Statement: A theological statement expresses beliefs, doctrines, or interpretations about religious matters, often based on sacred texts or traditions. Such statements are rooted in faith, interpretation, and the framework of a particular religious tradition, and are not typically subject to empirical verification in the same way as factual statements
Our difference is theological/interpretative - on whether or not the Biblical support is or is not sound interpretation AND if, when sound, is it sufficient for the doctrine it claims to support. Both of these require theological discussion. My statement carefully did not. Rather, it stated an axiom, nearly tautological, that every Catholic doctrine must have a Biblical basis. As I have been working recently on creeds of Sabbatarian, non-trinitarian Christian denominations, I am acutely aware that Biblical support offered is not the same as Biblical support accepted. But I acknowledge that the Sabbatarian, non-trinitarian Christians have studied and interpreted Scripture in good faith as have all who hold the diverse views that constitute Christianity.
