I asked Logos/Verbum and various third party websites: "how is gen 6,1-4 understood by catholic exegets, theology and magisterium"
The Logos/Verbum answer was a bit underwhelming:
Die katholische Exegese, Theologie und das Lehramt interpretieren Genesis 6,1-4 auf verschiedene Weise, wobei keine eindeutige Konsensposition existiert. Ein Ansatz versteht die "Söhne Gottes" als Nachkommen Seths und die "Töchter der Menschen" als Nachkommen Kains, wobei die Sünde in der Vermischung der gottesfürchtigen Sethiten mit den gottlosen Kainiten gesehen wird[1]. Eine andere, ältere Interpretation identifiziert die "Söhne Gottes" als himmlische Wesen oder Engel, basierend auf Parallelen in anderen biblischen und außerbiblischen Texten[2]. Einige Gelehrte sehen in dem Text auch eine mögliche Anspielung auf heidnische Mythologien[2]. Die Nephilim werden oft als Riesen oder halbgöttliche Wesen verstanden, die aus der Verbindung der "Söhne Gottes" und der "Töchter der Menschen" hervorgingen[3]. Insgesamt bleibt die Passage rätselhaft und Gegenstand anhaltender Debatten unter Exegeten, wobei die Interpretation stark davon abhängt, wie man mit den inhärenten textuellen Schwierigkeiten umgeht[4].
[1] Hamilton, Victor P.: Handbook on the Pentateuch. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI : Baker Academic, 2005
[2] Clendenen, E. Ray: Sons of God, Brand, C. (ed.). Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary.
[3] Peterson, Brian Neil: Nephilim, Barry, J. D. ; Bomar, D. ; Brown, D. R. ; Klippenstein, R. ; Mangum, D. ; Sinclair Wolcott, C. ; Wentz, L. ; Ritzema, E. ; et al. (eds.). The Lexham Bible Dictionary.
[4] Vervenne, Marc: All They Need is Love: Once More Genesis 6:1–4. In: Davies, J. ; Harvey, G. ; Watson, W. G. E. (eds.): Words Remembered, Texts Renewed, Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series. vol. 195. Sheffield : Sheffield Academic Press, 1995, p. 25
Perplexity exports only .pfd, html or .docx, but it was not too far from ChatGPT, which is here:
Genesis 6:1-4, which reads:
"When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. Then the Lord said, 'My Spirit will not contend with humans forever, for they are mortal; their days will be a hundred and twenty years.' The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown."
This passage is one of the more enigmatic parts of the early chapters of Genesis and has generated a wide variety of interpretations over time. In Catholic exegesis, theology, and the Magisterium, there are several key perspectives:
1. The "Sons of God" and "Daughters of Men" Interpretation
Catholic exegetes typically interpret the "sons of God" and "daughters of men" in various ways, with the two primary interpretations being:
a) The Line of Seth vs. The Line of Cain
This interpretation, often associated with St. Augustine, sees the "sons of God" as the descendants of Seth (the righteous son of Adam), and the "daughters of men" as the descendants of Cain (the wicked line). According to this view, the passage describes the intermarriage between the righteous and the unrighteous, which leads to moral decline. The resulting offspring, the Nephilim, are viewed as individuals of great renown but often associated with violence and corruption. In this case, the passage is seen as a way to explain the increasing wickedness on the earth prior to the flood.
b) Angelic or Divine Beings
Another interpretation, which has roots in Jewish tradition (particularly in the Book of Enoch), sees the "sons of God" as fallen angels who took human wives and fathered the Nephilim. This view is not widely accepted in Catholic theology, though it has been influential in some early Christian writings. The idea is that the Nephilim were giants or mighty warriors who were the result of these unions. However, the Catholic Church tends to prefer the more symbolic or genealogical interpretation over this supernatural explanation.
2. The Nephilim
The identity of the Nephilim is another point of interest. The word "Nephilim" itself is ambiguous. It is sometimes translated as "giants," though the exact meaning is debated. In Catholic exegesis:
- The Nephilim are often understood as beings of great strength or renown, possibly giants, but their moral or spiritual status is unclear. In some interpretations, they are considered the product of the sinful union between righteous and unrighteous lines, marking the beginning of the earth's moral decay.
- Some Catholic scholars suggest the Nephilim could be warriors or mighty men who became corrupt, embodying the violence and depravity that would lead to God's judgment through the Flood.
3. God's Judgment (My Spirit Will Not Contend Forever)
God's pronouncement that "My Spirit will not contend with humans forever" (Genesis 6:3) is typically seen by Catholic exegetes as a prelude to the judgment that will come through the Flood. The phrase can be understood as a warning that God will not indefinitely tolerate human sinfulness and rebellion.
- The "120 years" mentioned in this passage is often interpreted as the period of time God gives for repentance before the coming judgment (though some see it as a reference to the length of human life post-Flood).
- This also ties into the broader theological context of divine justice and mercy. God’s decision to limit human lifespan and prepare for judgment reflects his patience, but also the certainty of his judgment when evil becomes overwhelming.
4. Theological Themes
From a theological standpoint, several key themes emerge from this passage in Catholic thought:
a) The Corruption of Humanity
The passage underscores the idea that humanity is descending into greater sin, with the moral decay symbolized by the intermarriage of the righteous and unrighteous (or, in some interpretations, by the intrusion of fallen angels into the human sphere). The Nephilim, as mighty but corrupted beings, represent this state of moral chaos.
b) Divine Patience and Judgment
God's warning about the Spirit not contending forever highlights the tension between divine mercy and judgment. God’s patience is not infinite, and even in the face of wickedness, there is a limit to His forbearance. This is part of the broader biblical narrative, where God warns humanity before bringing judgment (e.g., through Noah and the Flood).
c) Human Freedom and Responsibility
The passage also touches on the free will of humans, as the "sons of God" chose to marry the "daughters of men," which, according to some interpretations, was an act of moral disobedience. The idea is that human choices, particularly the intermingling of the righteous and unrighteous, contribute to the corruption of society, with wide-reaching consequences.
5. The Magisterium
The Catholic Church, in its official teachings (Magisterium), has not issued a definitive interpretation of this passage, but the Church does emphasize the need to approach Scripture with respect for both the literal and spiritual senses. The literal sense is primarily concerned with understanding the historical context of the passage, while the spiritual sense seeks to uncover deeper theological meanings.
- In general, the Catholic Church leans toward a non-literal interpretation of Genesis 6:1-4 (in contrast to fundamentalist readings). The emphasis is on moral and spiritual lessons rather than a detailed explanation of supernatural phenomena (e.g., fallen angels).
- The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC), while not commenting specifically on this passage, offers a broader context for understanding Scripture: it teaches that "the books of Scripture must be read and interpreted in the light of the same Spirit by whom they were written" (CCC 111). This suggests that the Church’s approach to Genesis 6 should be informed by faith and tradition, as well as by scholarly exegesis.
Conclusion
In summary, Catholic exegesis tends to interpret Genesis 6:1-4 in a way that emphasizes moral and theological lessons, such as the dangers of moral decay, the limits of divine patience, and the need for human responsibility. The passage is not necessarily seen as describing literal angelic beings interacting with humans, but rather as a symbolic account of how corruption spread throughout humanity, leading to God’s judgment in the form of the Flood.
The Church does not mandate a single interpretation, and while it acknowledges the diversity of views, it encourages reading Scripture with an eye to both its historical context and deeper theological meanings.
—
Magisterium.com yielded concise results, too.
