How likely is it that the Berean Standard Bible will be tagged with a reverse interlinear, allowing for notes and highlights from other bible translations to be seen?
I agree with @DMB … not likely. If for some reason it becomes very popular, that might change, but I don't see that happening either. Nothing against it, but it really doesn't add anything in a modern translation we don't already have. Many of those adopting it are doing so for a perceived moral reason (public domain vs copyrighted) rather than a quality or similar reason, and those kinds of things don't usually result in widespread adoption.
Some translation orgs have restricted themselves to building data based on openly available sources like the Berean Study Bible. While it may not be heavily used in church/consumer circles in the US, it is playing an ever more important role as translation orgs build an openly-licensed set of resources and translate them into "languages of wider communication" (LWCs) for assistance in minority-language Bible translation across the world. My current job (been away from Logos for 2+ years) is at one of those orgs, and the Berean Standard Bible is one of the better openly licensed Bibles available in English. It is currently in the third edition as of early 2025 (I think the edition on Logos is the second or maybe even first edition). It actually has alignment data openly available for the NT (the alignment data is based on the SBLGNT!) and the OT (based on an edition of the Westminster Hebrew, but it is incredibly similar to the Lexham Hebrew Bible, and very mappable). I know because another colleague (Ulrik Sandborg-Petersen, who created the libraries that syntax searching in Logos uses) and I created the alignment data (based on openly available data from the publisher, the 'translation tables' available here). Another former Logos guy, Sean Boisen (who is now at Biblica), got it in shape for release through the Clear-Bible github (which is affiliated with Biblica). Anyway, the data is there. Logos would need to do some (not trivial) work to get it up to speed for their reverse interlinear implementation, but they're a whole lot closer than starting from scratch.
If anyone at Logos wants to chat with me about it, ping me at rickb@missionmutual.org .
rickb@missionmutual.org
@Bryan Cruthirds, in case you missed it, there was a recent discussion on interlinears, where a Logos employee chimed in:
Not really likely. Currently a reader-version.
But suggesting in the Books/Courses forum might help.
Just to clarify—@DMB and the poster are different people.
Great post, Rick.
Case: I am looking for all instances in the Bible where God is called Father. SEARCH 1: My first, intuitive search query would be a Precise Bible Search on father EQUALS person:God. However, I am surprised to see only two hits from the OT. SEARCH 2: Performing a much less intuitive Precise Bible Search on sense:="God ⇔…
Hi everyone, I’ve encountered a strange issue and hope someone can help me understand what’s going on. I have two different Logos accounts. Both are used on the same computer, with the same Logos version, and neither account has any paid subscription or base package upgrade beyond the free Logos Basic setup. However,…
I'm not using Logos very much lately. Today I opened and did bible search, and as I recall, the Search Engine options were Precise and Smart (AI?). And the Smart option is something that I have to pay for. Am I mistaken that the choice in the past was Precise and Fuzzy? What happened to Fuzzy? It looks like the free Fuzzy…
Logos sold me a profanity-laced book (think the worst words you can think of). Logos would not let me return the book because my order was a smidgen over 30 days old. Fair enough. But now I have this junk in my library. Distaste is growing. My confidence in Logos' quality isn't there anymore. But here is the real reason…
is there a way to import a cab, xlsx, xml or other format of file containing a list of your print books. I have taken months to catalog all my books into one app. I’d rather not renter them all one at a time. Any ideas? Thanks