This is just a comment, but I'm wondering if anyone else shares my opinion on this.
So the other day I did a Smart Search within Logos to find out more about a certain capital city in OT times. I did get an answer, but what surprised me was that the first answer in those results was taken from … one of my novels.
Now that's great, till Smart Search, in answer to the question, "What is God's will for my life?", comes back with "Get thee to a nunnery", since I also have Shakespeare in Logos 😁
So my comment is this: can AI not be organized so that it places answers in a default order by importance, for instance: Bible first, Commentaries/Dictionaries/Encyclopaedias second, everything else, such as novels, last. Or do I have to be forced to include "don't search fiction in the results" as part of my query?
What I did appreciate of course, was the "white box AI" aspect of the search results, where at a minimum, I was immediately able to tell where the answer had been taken from.
Thoughts?
PS. This is how I know mainstream ArtificiaI Intelligence isn't really ready for the Big Time, involving a query about Pinty's (chicken) Wings here in Canada:
ME: "Hey Google, does Walmart carry Pinty's Wings?"
GOOGLE: "Yes, Walmart carries many feminine hygiene products, including pantiliners with wings."
My husband and I are still laughing about that one, and now when I feel someone is gushing just a tad too much about AI, I just look at them, deadpan, and say "Remember pantiliners with wings." 😉