My collection of "resources" is called a "library", correct? Then shouldn't I be able to sort and arrange my library just like a library does...with a sort of dewey decimal system? I don't mean that literally, of course. But being able to collect all of my resources in folders and subfolders would be immensely helpful, not to mention logical. I am somewhat ADD, and things like "litter" and "scatter" really annoy me and can even reduce my sense of working "wellness"; in other words it has a negative psychological effect on me. Having "collections" that don't start with the same word in their title means the collections are scattered alphabetically willy nilly. For instance, the T&T BS series each is named after it namesake Bible book and are not given a "series" label. Thus they are scattered randomly through my "library". I can group some things by "series", but that is only a slight improvement since my collections are still not grouped and sorted in any logical way (i.e. the series are listed by alphabetical order, not by book type), and many collections don't have a "series" identification (even when they should--such as the papyri collection). Yes, setting priorities on certain items is helpful in certain circumstances, but it is far from a universal sollution. Is there an option to do this? If not, how long before there can be?
