Morph search broken?

I was reading in the ESV about Moses' dealings with Pharaoh because I watched a mini series with Ben Kingsley and wanted to check a few things...

In the process I right clicked "hardened" in the ESV and chose the "hardened with morphology" option....and nothing came up....

uh....shouldn't at least ONE have come up since I'm copying and pasting from that particular passage?

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Chris Elford

Robert,

I get the same thing with "hardened" כבד in Ex 7:15 - selected the lemma or morph from the right side and then lemma:1 כבד@VhAa - resulted in no hits.

Chris

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/45661#Comment_45661

The lemma format should be lemma:חזק.1@VpAmSM3 ie. with a period after the 1

Similarly Ex 8.15 should be lemma:כבד.1@VhAa

Chris Elford

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/45966#Comment_45966

The lemma format should be lemma:חזק.1@VpAmSM3 ie. with a period after the 1

Similarly Ex 8.15 should be lemma:כבד.1@VhAa

Thanks, Dave. I didn't realize that.

But, please realize that this is getting the format using the menu from Logos. It is a bug then.

EDIT: When I put the search in the morph search window, "by hand," the period is added automatically, but not from the right click menu from the ESV Interlinear.

Chris

George Somsel

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/45966#Comment_45966

The lemma format should be lemma:חזק.1@VpAmSM3 ie. with a period after the 1

Similarly Ex 8.15 should be lemma:כבד.1@VhAa

I'm really disappointed with the new morph search. It's flakey. Sing along with me, brothers:

Give me that old morph search system;
Give me that old morph search system;
Give me that old morph search system;
It's good enough for me.

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/45969#Comment_45969

But, please realize that this is getting the format using the menu from Logos. It is a bug then.

Yes, it is a BUG. It should have a period after the homonym number.

EDIT:

Other bugs, features present in L3, still exist http://community.logos.com/forums/p/4896/38584.aspx#38584

Chris Elford

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/46001#Comment_46001

Dave,

Thanks for the EDIT. I'd missed that post. Hopefully, Logos will get those things caught up and find a way to take it to the next level. They certainly seem to be trying and doing that in lots of areas.

Chris

Bradley Grainger (Logos)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/46001#Comment_46001

But, please realize that this is getting the format using the menu from Logos. It is a bug then.

Yes, it is a BUG. It should have a period after the homonym number.

Thanks for reporting this bug; it should be fixed after Beta 3. As a workaround, you can use the "Lemma" context menu item (instead of "Morph") which generates the correct search.

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/51248#Comment_51248

Thanks, Bradley.

NB. I've reporetd this bug in the wiki.

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/51248#Comment_51248

Thanks for reporting this bug; it should be fixed after Beta 3.

Sadly it is not fixed in B5. A Morph Search uses the format lemma:חזק:1 -- where the change from 1. (dot) to1: (colon) is affecting things!

Bradley Grainger (Logos)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/57034#Comment_57034

Thanks for reporting this bug; it should be fixed after Beta 3.

Sadly it is not fixed in B5. A Morph Search uses the format lemma:חזק:1 -- where the change from 1. (dot) to1: (colon) is affecting things!

The colon can be used to separate the homograph number from the lemma; we switched to it to allow dot to be used for dagesh in a future Latin->Hebrew keyboard mapping.

I don't have any problems running the search with the colon; how is it affecting things for you?

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/57191#Comment_57191

I don't have any problems running the search with the colon; how is it affecting things for you?

I get zero results from Context Menu searches.

EDIT: (have to qualify previous comment)

Morph Search uses previous "New Testament" range (irrespective of Search target!).

With correct range Morph Search is OK.

I originally got zero results from Search this resource (a Bible Search) but I can't reproduce that.