Bug: Morph Search Analysis column header won't stay in place

I'm running morph searches for a list of Hebrew verb forms with the results shown as "Analysis." I'd like the columns to be ordered "person, gender, number," but each time I run a new search, "person" moves to after "gender". Other changes I've made in the selection and order of columns displayed remain in place from search to search.

It's a very small thing, but annoying.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Melissa Snyder

Hello Mary-Ellen,

I've tried to reproduce this, but haven't been able to. Can you perhaps attach a screenshot of your Analysis results for a couple of different searches, so I can reproduce exactly what you're doing? Also, is your Logos 4 at version 4.0a (4.01.3.4533)? (Press alt+p then b to find version information.)

Thanks,
Melissa

Mary-Ellen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/65425#Comment_65425

I'm working my way through Rocine, Learning Biblical Hebrew. Here's the screen after I did a search (by cutting and pasting from Rocine) and after I re-ordered the columns the way I want them:

Then I ran the same search again, and the columns had re-ordered themselves:

And yes, I am using the version you identified.

Thanks for your interest!

Melissa Snyder

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/65456#Comment_65456

I'm working my way through Rocine, Learning Biblical Hebrew. Here's the screen after I did a search (by cutting and pasting from Rocine) and after I re-ordered the columns the way I want them:

Are you re-running the search from the history drop-down? This is what I found:

I copied from the LBH and pasted וְהֵבִיא into the Find box in the Morph Search panel. I got the same 19 results and removed, grouped, and reorder columns so it looked the same as your top screenshot. I then clicked into the Find box and reran the same search. The columns didn't change. I restarted Logos 4 and brought up Morph Search again, pasted the word and searched again -- columns were still the same: Person | Gender | Number.

Finally, I closed Search, reopened it, and chose the above search from the search history drop-down to the right of the Find box. The results screen looked like it did when I first ran the search, before making changes to the columns. So it appears that it's not remembering the changes made to the view as it should. I will report this.

Melissa

Mary-Ellen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/66127#Comment_66127

Thanks, Melissa.

I "think" I was using a fresh copy-and-paste to run the subsequent search. I would also have the same reordering of columns when I copy-and-pasted a brand new word for a new search.

I'm glad you were able to reproduce something at least approximating my issue. Good work, Sherlock!

Mary-Ellen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/69208#Comment_69208

I thought of something else to try -- initiating the search by clicking on the arrow in the blue circle vs. pressing enter.

Unfortunately, both these methods resulted in the column headers reverting to "Gender | Person" instead of "Person | Gender"

777

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/69518#Comment_69518

Hi Mary-Ellen,

How are you finding Rocine's material to work with?

I had been curious about this resource for a while and after you posted a reference to it I felt compelled to purchase it just to see his angle. I'm reading over it now.

Thank you,

Mike

Mary-Ellen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/69541#Comment_69541

I wouldn't have considered working through this book as my first introduction to Biblical Hebrew, but it makes a good refresher. An answer handbook would also be helpful.

It is my first pedagogical introduction to discourse-level syntax. I am enjoying this new angle--it definitely adds a new dimension to perceiving meaning. I especially appreciate the inductive teaching style. (But to have a way to conveniently "look back and check," I am copying in a spiral notebook his "rules" and "definitions" and each "discourse profile" that he presents, and want to print out several of the "helpful charts" in the appendix.)

He seems to have his own vocabulary; in general it seems this field is new enough that indeed there is no one terminology that all resources use.

I'd be interested in hearing from anyone who has used this book as a classroom text.