Center for New Testament Textual Studies' New Testament Critical Apparatus
This looks like an interesting tool, but a little expensive at $100. Is there anything else that does what this does but cheaper--maybe something I already have?
Comments
-
Not likely to the extent that CNTTS does. Its EXHAUSTIVE and well worth $100 if you're working in or interested in the field of textual criticism.
For book reviews and more visit sojotheo.com
0 -
-
Depends if you need exhaustive. Few do. Actually the free one in the Files subforum is a nice in-between the NA/UNS ones and CNTTS. I'm out the door, else I'd find it.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
I looked and couldn't find it, so if anyone can point me to that free version, I'd like to check that out
0 -
Josh Hunt said:
I looked and couldn't find it, so if anyone can point me to that free version, I'd like to check that out
I'm back.
https://community.logos.com/forums/t/46696.aspx
I like it, since a quick glance answers a lot of questions. It doesn't have the popups per mss, and thus assumes a working knowledge of at least the big ones. OTOH, it adds quick pointers to Byz/WH distinctions, a layer that the others don't (except the FL one).
The CNTTS one is nice because you can color code the listed mss's by approx date, and usefulness. Another quick glance. OTOH, the formatting of Logos' CNTTS is inefficient (data per verse extensive), so I keep it inattached in my NT layout. Else quite molassas-y.
The above posting also includes another series of files for the mss's:
https://community.logos.com/forums/p/47467/352738.aspx#352738
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
This should be included in a Base Package.
ASUS ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti
"The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not." Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.
0 -
0
-
Denise said:
I'm back.
https://community.logos.com/forums/t/46696.aspx
I like it, since a quick glance answers a lot of questions. It doesn't have the popups per mss, and thus assumes a working knowledge of at least the big ones. OTOH, it adds quick pointers to Byz/WH distinctions, a layer that the others don't (except the FL one).
The CNTTS one is nice because you can color code the listed mss's by approx date, and usefulness. Another quick glance. OTOH, the formatting of Logos' CNTTS is inefficient (data per verse extensive), so I keep it inattached in my NT layout. Else quite molassas-y.
The above posting also includes another series of files for the mss's:
https://community.logos.com/forums/p/47467/352738.aspx#352738
Thanks!
0 -
Denise said:
the formatting of Logos' CNTTS is inefficient (data per verse extensive),
Logos should design an overly user-friendly user interface for CNTTS [:$]
Gold package, and original language material and ancient text material, SIL and UBS books, discourse Hebrew OT and Greek NT. PC with Windows 11
0 -
Denise said:
https://community.logos.com/forums/t/46696.aspx
I like it, since a quick glance answers a lot of questions. It doesn't have the popups per mss, and thus assumes a working knowledge of at least the big ones. OTOH, it adds quick pointers to Byz/WH distinctions, a layer that the others don't (except the FL one).
Correction: CNTTS does include handling by Robinson (Byz), Holmes (SBL) and the 1873 TR. I do like Trigalles inclusion in SBL ... a nice touch.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0
