Dear Bob (and his business advisors)
As someone who has shown more than a
passing interest in business management and product marketing, you
would realise the importance of good reviews (you even make a special
point of asking customers to do so e.g. when introducing your book
and a number of times for your bible software. In addition you often
make refer people to good reviews on your website, forums etc).
Over just the last week, I have
recently read lots of different reviews of Logos 4. Here are some
extracts:
-
“one
major lack”
-
“hope
for something better”
-
“We
need this functionality.”
-
“I
need it now”
-
“I
really need a powerful and robust note tool.”
-
“But
it leaves me feeling a bit wishy washy about my time spent in Logos”
-
“always
been a need.”
-
“disappointed”
-
“real
area for improvement”
-
“will
affect nearly every user of Logos”
-
“The
lack of a comprehensive note taking system, (that includes the most
used features of a word processor), is 90% of the reason L4 is not
my "go-to" program”
-
“The
desire of the 'masses' to have improved note function IS NOT going
to go away and will only continue to rise.”
-
“current
incarnation of notes in L4 is totally useless to me.”
-
“I've
given up any hope of getting a powerful note taking facility in
Logos”
-
“As
much as I LOVE L4 - Note taking has been a HUGE disapointment.”
-
“note
taking is HUGELY important to get right.”
-
“so
many people complain about it!”
-
“I
reached point of surrender, and am now disallusioned,”
-
“I
am resigned to fact that the visionaries/designers/decision
makers must hate notes,”
-
“am
sadly resigned to fact notes in program will never(excepting act of
God) be of a adequte standard”
-
“always
has been Logos's achilles heel”
-
“I
figured that by now with all the posts about the need they would
have changed their minds”
-
“I
am not willing to give up on this issue.”
-
“still
leaves me pretty disappointed.”
-
“To
me, these are defects - BUGS - in the existing software and have to
be fixed.”
-
“Notetaking
and reading go hand-in-hand. It seems so obvious to so many of us
that quality notetaking is important”
-
“L4
notes are not even adequate, and far from full featured.”
-
“Notetaking
has always been my biggest disappointment in Logos. I've always
hoped that an improvement would be coming but it never comes.”
-
“I
get depressed. I want to love L4...but it just isn't
happening.”
-
“..it's
a functional disaster!”
-
“the
choice to limit the note-taking features of L4 is a similar
backwards step”
-
“I
hear a chorus of voices saying Notes is their lifeblood.
It is true for me. I hope Bob will see this.”
-
“Logos,
are you guys listening? This really would be an important
feature for many users.”
-
“Logos
are you listening?”
-
“What
part of this doesn't Logos understand?”
-
“So
many Logos CUSTOMERS
- (Are
you listening Logos?)
- are asking - no, PLEADING
for
this feature.”
-
“I
would LOVE to use L4 as my main Bible software program but I
cannot.”
-
“Again,
just today...notes....AAAAAARRRRRRGGGG! Please make them
usable.”
-
“I'm
sure my complaint isn't new, but the frustration in using Logos 4
with such poor notes got to me today.”
etc.
Surely the amount of different people
all making similar negative comments would make the CEO / MD of any
company start listening, especially when they realise the source of
the quotes – not from disinterested third-party external reviewers,
but from loyal, committed, dedicated customers.
Note also that all these comments are
right up-to-date (March 2010) and from just one of the many, many
forum threads on this issue
(http://community.logos.com/forums/t/5503.aspx), but it must be noted
that extremely similar comments have been made for at least the last
two product life-cycles (see the news-group archives).
The company also has a “User voice”
experiment asking for votes and suggestions for improvement from a
customer base that regularly uses the product. Of the many
suggestions, two items are consisently the highest rated.
What do a significant number of your
loyal, dedicated customers see as a failing of the product? NOTES!
Although customers appear frustrated at
your lack of response on the issue. Let's unpick a response given by
yourself on the issue a while ago.
The two parts were about:
1. Your (Bob's) personal perceived
purpose of notes
2. Your notion of not wanting to
(re-)create (what you call) “a word processor”
Taking each in turn:
1. Purpose of notes
“The problem appears to me that
Bob only sees notes as a way to attach short annotations a
la a study bible to a passage (he has said so on many
occusions). He does not appear to see them as a way to collect,
collate, and analyze data”
You have said, “Or are users
wanting to create larger documents than I envision, inside the notes
system?”.
The answer is clearly and significantly
YES YES YES. There seems to be a serious mismatch between your
/ Logos' Vision and users' wishes / desires and requests for notes.
2. The concept of a re-creating a “word
processor”
I quote myself from
http://community.logos.com/forums/p/9360/82721.aspx#82721
(yet another on the many threads concerning notes):
“About this "word-processor"
mind set - I wouldn't call OneNote a word processor etc. Think of
what we want along the lines of a document text editor.
I don't (yet!!!) see the need for Mail-Merge in Logos notes!! But the
ability to add tables, graphics, hyperlinks, annotations, cut, copy,
paste, sort, colour, bullet points etc are basic document editor
items.
Where Logos can improve on the "Word-processor"
concept and make it their own is by adding Bible/book
related features (e.g. sort in canonical order,
links to pages/images in Logos books, easy entry of Greek/Hebrew,
drag and drop a biblical reference in and have the text appear in the
note etc etc) - these are the things that Word doesn't
have. In addition it's not easy having notes in separate
Word documents as searching is a pain - if documents were intergral
to Logos then we could unleash full powerful Logos searching on the
note-documents”
FINALLY....
Let me ask – can you put into one
sentence the purpose of Logos 4 software (I assume you can).
Does it include the notion of “letting
users effectively study the Bible”? (I hope it does – in fact
if logos 4 is seen simply as a bible book library reader software
then there are lots of current items in the product which shouldn't
be there because they are soley for effective study)
I am assuming that effective study IS
one of your raison detre's. A quick review and analysis of any
book/website on studying will include a (large) section on making and
taking effective notes. Notes and study are inextricably linked.
Thus, it follows, that if a main purpose of Logos 4 is enabling
effective Bible study then effective note taking must be at
it's core.
You have recently indicated that you
have now more time and energy to move your focus onto further
development (cf “If Logos had a million dollars” thread of the
forums). The consensus of the thread seemed to be use it for
marketing. Your own loyal dedicated customers, by word of mouth,
would be good marketers if they weren't so frustrated by the lack of
effective note-taking facilities. If you did have a million dollars,
I hope you would put the development of notes as THE number one, top,
highest priority.
I know you listen to users (even if
frustratingly you don't always reply).
I hope that in this case your listening
will change the mind-set of Logos and action on this matter will
result. If it does then Logos 4 will be the ultimate one-stop
bible-study software solution – something I want it to be and I
hope you do too.
Thanks for taking your valuable time to
read and carefully consider this long letter.
Yours in Christ,
James Hudson