The future of Logos and Faithlife: Help us make the right decisions!

We’ve been building Logos Bible Software since 1991. It’s the heart of everything we do, and of accomplishing our mission:

We use technology to equip the Church to grow in the light of the Bible.

Logos is the premiere tool for people who are serious about Bible study. It’s heavily used by pastors, scholars, seminary students, and lay people.

But people who are serious about Bible study -- and want to use a powerful, dedicated tool for study -- are a small percentage of most churches. We want to serve everyone in the church, and we know that many people ‘grow in the light of the Bible’ through classes, small groups, video, and free content on the web.

Faithlife Equip is our platform for helping everyone in every church grow in the light of the Bible. We believe an integrated platform (one account!) is of great value to the church, and that the more we integrate the daily ‘mechanics and logistics’ of the church (member management, communications, calendar, giving, website, etc.) with biblical content (sermons, curriculum, Bible study, videos, etc.) the more likely it is that we can engage and serve the whole church.

And, if you’ll forgive the bluntness, the more likely we’ll be here to serve you in the future.

I’ve always erred on the side of transparency in discussing how our business works, especially here in the forums.

And you have always been direct in response... Sometimes enough to hurt! But in a good, constructive way. “Wounds of a friend”... :-)

First, Logos is doing well. We’re still healthy and still growing. Logos Bible Software is still profitable and we plan to be here, serving you, for decades to come..

But ‘software’ is changing. We’re adapting, by offering Logos on whatever platform you prefer, or all of them: downloadable to Mac and Windows, mobile on iOS and Android, and purely on the web at https://app.logos.com. Simply put, this is expensive. Yes, it’s the cost of doing business, but it means developing on five platforms, and it does cost more. (I miss the days of three platforms… and the days of just one, before that!)

And people aren’t buying software the way they used to. Some simply don’t buy software. Some subscribe to online tools, but spend less than they used to spend on downloadable software. Others are ‘satisficing’ with free content on the web, when they previously might have bought Logos, even if they weren’t going to be a heavy user.

Content producers are looking at digital as an important revenue stream. They have more channels through which to sell, and want to keep a higher percentage of the revenue. At the same time, the channels want a big cut: Apple and Google keep 30% of revenue from in-app purchases, and more and more sales are moving to mobile vs. direct.

Logos Bible Software generates revenue through content sales; we don’t charge for the software engine. But over the past 28 years the world has changed, and now how we get paid is out of alignment with how the market works. (Don’t worry, we’re not going to change it or break our promises to you about the free engine. But it’s something we have to adapt to.)

The good news is that there’s a win-win solution for us and for our users: church technology.

We sell Bible study tools to people who attend (and often lead) churches. Churches need Bible study tools, content, and curriculum, which we’ve been providing for years. But they also need membership management, online giving, websites, presentation software, music resources, email, texting, etc., especially, as the first ‘born-digital’ generation moves into adulthood.

Today many churches are redefining ‘regular attender’ from 3-4 times a month to 1-2 times. Communities and relationships are being managed and nurtured online, and people expect everything to be available in the cloud, from sermons to handouts to curriculum to books to videos to music. It needs to be on the web, on their phones, and on their smart TVs. And in the church, all of these things are centered on the Bible. And the Bible is our ‘home turf’!

As an organization, a church is people who come together at times and places to study the Bible and love and serve each other. And it’s technology that hosts the calendar and manages the communications in that community.

You have trusted us for almost 30 years to build tools to help you study the Bible. If we can also be your supplier for the related tools and technology your church needs, we can not only help you help others ‘grow in the light of the Bible,’ but we can build a new, royalty-free revenue stream that helps us deliver all of these tools, including Logos Bible Software.

This is why we believe it’s important to expand our offerings. But it’s a crowded space.

We generally don’t talk about our competitors. We focus on building great tools and serving our customers well, and hope that that’s enough to win in the marketplace.

That has worked for Logos Bible Software, and we hope it will work with Faithlife Equip as we enter new, adjacent markets.

But something has changed in the world of church technology: the big money has moved in.

Church technology was largely provided by small companies that were born out of a solution the founder built for their own church. Most of those companies were much smaller than Faithlife, but just as mission-driven.

In the past few years, though, the ‘professional business world’ has decided that church technology is a big market -- especially online giving. (I hate using that phrase, since I think of Faithlife as a ‘professional business’ too…. Is it better to say “Wall Street”? I mean public companies, private equity firms, etc.)

More than 45 church technology companies were bought by a single company in the past four years. That company has been sold repeatedly, and is now owned by a private equity firm, which has combined it with companies serving non-church nonprofits, associations, etc.

The other large firm in online giving for churches is a public company.

An independent church technology firm recently sold out to a large public company that builds nonprofit management tools; another sold to an online giving provider that has taken in private equity.

And, of course, several significant Christian publishers are divisions of larger, secular publishing companies.

There is nothing wrong with any of this. These are businesses, and they get bought and sold; they need investment capital to grow. And there are fantastic, mission-driven, Bible-believing, church-loving leaders in all of these organizations. We’ve met them, and count many as friends.

There are no sour grapes here; every one of these options is available to Faithlife too. We get called weekly about taking in private equity or selling the business. We are a business, too, and we could take professional investment or choose to sell.

I just don’t want to.

As much as I love business (I wrote a book about it!), I love our customers and our mission more. Businesses need spreadsheets and steely-eyed analysts, but that’s not the part of the business that excites me, and I’m loathe to turn Faithlife over to the people who do find that exciting.

(I’ll consult them, to make sure we’re acting responsibly… I just don’t want them to drive.)

We’re planning to stay independent. We’re assuming that:

...if we earned your trust over the past 28 years with Logos Bible Software, you’ll consider us for your church technology needs, or recommend us to someone who will.

...we can deliver solutions as good as (or better than) our new competitors, because we still have one of the largest, smartest technology teams serving the church; because we’re focused on churches, not secular nonprofits; and because we have all of you to help us get it right.

...churches actually do care who they’re doing business with.

We only need to be right on two of these, and I wouldn’t be surprised if we’re wrong on the third -- maybe churches rank ‘does it best / safest’ above who owns the business, and I wouldn’t fault them. I buy lots of stuff from companies whose policies or leadership don’t reflect my values. But if I can get as good or better a product from a business that cares about me and shares my values, they are my preference.

And don’t worry -- even if we’re wrong on all three assumptions, your investment in Logos Bible Software will be fine.

So tell me, what do you think?

Are we on the right track? Are we making the right assumptions? What would we need to do to earn your church’s business?

And most importantly, how do we get Logos Bible Software users to take a look at our church products? What message would work best with you? Will you start hanging out in our Faithlife church platform forum and give us advice? https://community.logos.com/forums/101.aspx

(Really -- we need your expertise and advice more than anything else. Our primary competitive advantage is our existing connection to church leaders: you!)

Should the message focus on: Integration with biblical content / education? The integrated platform (no more five accounts to manage)? Awesome features? Our independent status? Our history serving customers well? Our competitors’ Wall Street connections? (Just kidding…)

Over the years you’ve never stopped telling us how to make Logos Bible Software the best tool for Bible study; I would very much value your wisdom and advice as we look to serve more people in your church.


P.S. FWIW, our new, full church management system is still getting the finishing touches (membership management, communications, child check-in, etc.). But website hosting, sermon archiving, online giving, and more are all working completely right now. You can see our “Early Access” website here: https://equip.faithlife.com/ -- dozens of churches are onboard already!

Right now, Equip ‘Early Access’ is an amazing deal… and I’m surprised every Logos user hasn’t gotten their church onto Faithlife TV for Churches (https://faithlifetv.com/church), because it’s worth it for the Mobile Ed courses alone… and Faithlife Giving (https://giving.faithlife.com/) is fantastic and will be super-well integrated with the whole platform. I hope you’ll check it out.

Comments

Sort by:
1 - 28 of 281

    Here are some of my thoughts:

    1) As a lay person, I am not in a direct position to have much influence whether my local church subscribes to your proposed "church business" software offerings.  I don't see myself as a target customer (although if my church adopted this, as a Logos user, I'm sure I would be happy to jump on board with the integrated services).

    2) Lets be honest and acknowledge that Logos Bible Study software is complex.  It takes a lot of effort to learn how to use the tools, especially with the limited up-to-date documentation on how the software works.  You have to devote hours of study on how to use the software and many use third party services to get training.  It is evident in browsing the forums that many (myself included) often struggle figuring out how to use the basics of the software.  Lets extrapolate this to the proposed church services offerings.  Will churches have the stomach to learn how to use the Logos based systems (especially if the included documentation/training/support is as weak as it is with the Bible Study software)?  Large churches with dedicated IT staff may be able to pull it off, but my guess is that the majority of smaller churches won't want to deal with the technology.

    3) My biggest concern as a Logos customer is that I see this initiative as a resource drain away from improvements that I would like to see with the Bible study software.  There are a ton of features "in development" that I'm afraid will never be implemented if Logos resources become stretched into other areas.  For example, the "new notes" sounded like a great concept, but there is some very basic functionality that I would expect in a polished product that we are still waiting for.

    Thanks for asking for input and I'll pray for wisdom for you and your staff in the decisions ahead.

    2) Lets be honest and acknowledge that Logos Bible Study software is complex.  It takes a lot of effort to learn how to use the tools, especially with the limited up-to-date documentation on how the software works.

    Thanks for the feedback; this is a good reminder about the need to keep up the documentation. I just talked with the relevant team about making sure still-relevant Logos Pro and other feature videos don't get lost on the revised website; are there particular areas you'd like to see more help on?

    We also believe that the mobile apps and Faithlife TV will be continue to become more accessible to users who don't want to invest as much in learning the full Logos system.

    3) My biggest concern as a Logos customer is that I see this initiative as a resource drain away from improvements that I would like to see with the Bible study software.

    I understand the concern, and we're trying to avoid it. But that's one of my points here; without other product revenue sources, it's getting harder for us to support the investment. So we'll go through a period of needing to redirect resources to launching new products, but should come out on the other side with a broader revenue base to support investment in Logos, where margins are tightening.

    As always Bob I appreciate your transparency and candor. Having been a Logos customer going back to the old Libronix days, I have benefitted from the evolution of the software tools and features. Over the years I have tried other products, but remain convinced that Logos is the Premier bible study software on the market.

    Last year I also became a Proclaim customer. I pastor a small church and we had been using PowerPoint for many years. I liked many of the features in proclaim, especially the integration with Logos. However the church did not have an extra $200 in the budget to spend on presentation software. So I bought our first year's subscription. I am hoping to get it in the church budget this year, now that they have had a chance to see it work. If not, I'll likely cover it again.

    We recently switched to Faithlife sites from another website provider. We are currently using the free site. The premium plan is twice the cost we were paying before. That is the problem with many of the additional services and tools Faithlife is offering. The quality of the products is good and continuously improving. Many are feature rich, but many of those features are not needed for a small church like ours, with the demographics of our congregation.

    I would not presume to tell you, or even suggest, an appropriate price point for any of your products. I would simply say that for a church like ours it is unlikely that we would spend $100 a month for access to Equip. Most in my congregation would not use them. The staff consists of me and a part-time minister of music. Lest we be considered unique, I took a look at the churches who are members of our local denominational association. There are 34 churches in that group. Maybe 6 of them would be of a size and congregational makeup that would be attracted to something like Equip. I would guess that if I were to include the churches in my area who are outside my denominational association, the percentages would be about the same. 

    Bottom line is that while your products and services are great, they are only appealing less than 20% of the market. In many areas that is probably far less. For example, I have been in the "bible belt" for last twenty years. Prior to that I was part of the same denomination in Northern California. There our association was about half the size, and covered five Northern California counties. The largest church in our association probably averaged about 70 people on Sundays.

    Again, I would not presume to try and tell you how to run the business, You get enough of that on these forums already. But it seems to me that you have to decide if targeting less than 20% of your potential market will bring the desired results. If so, you are probably on the right track, and I would not change direction. But if you think it's a good idea to expand your market reach, then there probably needs to be a strategy that offers the kinds of tools and services the majority of the market needs, at a price that will be budget friendly to the church that is working with very limited budgets. One example that comes to mind in the church management arena is ChurchTrac. They offer a feature rich church management program at a price point most church can easily afford.

    Again, I would not presume to try and tell you how to run the business, You get enough of that on these forums already. But it seems to me that you have to decide if targeting less than 20% of your potential market will bring the desired results. 

    Apple had 80% or so of the personal computer market in the Apple ][ . Then they dropped 90% of their market when they came out with the Mac leaving them with about 5% of the market [at that time].  They made much more money by concentrating on a section that they could master.

    Then they dropped 90% of their market when they came out with the Mac

    That is revisionist history! They dropped their marketshare when MSFT ripped off the GUI OS and licensed it to clones. 

    macOS, iOS & iPadOS |Logs| Install
    Choose Truth Over Tribe | Become a Joyful Outsider!

    Then they dropped 90% of their market when they came out with the Mac

    That is revisionist history! They dropped their marketshare when MSFT ripped off the GUI OS and licensed it to clones. 

    Didn't Apple rip off Xerox regarding the invention and use of GUIs? What goes around comes around. Too bad more people don't contemplate that fundamental fact and its downstream impact. Politics, religion, daily life...

    I think the point David was making is that FL would probably serve itself better by being the Mac of the Bible study world. I have probably influenced 2-3 people at most to buy Logos over 20+ years of use. When it comes down to it, most people's treasure isn't Scripture, so they don't spend their treasure on Scripture mastery. Freebies suffice for many, and most don't even want or perceive a need for the freebies. As has been suggested above (and I think I may have suggested it years ago, in so many words), "the Mac approach" of focusing on the serious Bible study crowd (pastors, yes, but primarily the scholarly community) is the focus that would probably serve FL the best going forward.

    I also think Logos needs to rethink their licensing procedures, stepping up and creating a sort of Spotify for Bible study groups. Study groups could rent a given book for a month or three, and each person in the reading group would have access to the book for that time. Remember that Netflix took off because people could keep the movie as long as they wanted and there weren't overdue charges and people loved that. The platform could be based on Logos and include a given Bible and a smattering of helps, like Strong's, etc. I imagine that many of the books that would find interest would be in the Ebooks (Vyrso) arena. In all of these options, publishers need to be made to see (twist some arms if need be) that a total price restructuring that takes into account Spotify-style pricing (either pool pricing or deep discount...75%+) will create the kind of value that attracts customers and may even increase the potential readership pool, i.e. create more and new readers.

    Speaking of Netflix, maybe FL could parlay their mEd and FLTV materials into a kind of Bible Study Video Club, where "book groups", so to speak, actually get together to watch videos and take mEd classes for a few weeks or months. If the pricing is friendly (i.e. cheap enough that a group of 5-10 can do one or two videos every month or two and feel able to financially keep going after the first videos are completed), this might take off. I think that most of the best ideas will require FL to make some rootbed changes to the "single user" licensing model. If FL can't or won't, they may find themselves floating in the doldrums seas for a long time to come.

    From what I can tell, Bob is picking up on the fascination of contemporary mindsets for electronic gadgetry (a la Internet Of Things), and he wants to move that into churches. I think he may do better focusing on church members. Start with something that is like or close to something people are already doing (book groups, for instance) and provide a way for such groups to access their books (or videos) electronically. Despite what the old fogies who post to this forum may prefer, younger people are not as into ownership and they are quite content with temporary access. Focus on the "green" (i.e. treeless) aspect and play that up.

    ASUS  ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti

    "The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not."  Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.

    Many are feature rich, but many of those features are not needed for a small church like ours, with the demographics of our congregation.

    We are planning to make much of Faithlife Equip free for small churches; your example of Faithlife Sites is a good one: it's free if you are okay with having your site at "churchname.faithlifesites.com" (and you can even have a domain redirect here). That might be enough for a very small church; you only have to pay if you want it hosted at a domain. And in the full Equip bundle, the website service is just one of many things bundled at one price; while you can purchase it alone, it'll be an even better value in a bundle.

    Thanks to the power law, :-), 20% of the market is almost always where 80% of the revenue comes from. (It's true of Logos revenue, too...) I certainly don't want to ignore the largest group of churches, and that's why we're going to make as much of Equip as possible usable by small churches at no cost, but we want to deliver enough value that churches of 150+ (just a guess) will find enough value to want to make it part of their budget. (We expect, with our bundled pricing, that they'll even be able to save money, because we'll start replacing enough other services they already pay for.)

    I'm a late comer to the conversation, and haven't made it through all (currently 5) pages of replies and comments yet. However the response offered by @Fred Chapman on the first page pretty closely sums up my own situation as the pastor of a numerically small congregation. For me, that means that all technology purchases &/or subscriptions are paid for out of pocket, we simply don't have a budget for them at all. I will be honest, I haven't tried Proclaim at all. I almost certainly won't since the current model is far outside my budget. While I agree with Mr Pritchett that the current trend in software is migrating away from software downloads to service subscriptions, that tends to ultimately be best for the companies and not always for the end user. Within my own situation, I would be far more willing to consider proclaim if there were a single point purchase option much like PowerPoint (at least for now, MS may not offer that much longer either).

    With FaithlifeTV, I like some of the content and have access through my Faithlife subscription. I do use it from time to time but it needs some polish to bring it up to par. Just adding the ability to have a watchlist would be a massive QoL improvement.

    I may comment again later once I have read and considered the other comments, but here is at least a start.

    I love Logos and have invested quite a bit into my library. And I really appreciate the leadership of Bob and the way he runs his business.

    My main criticism of Logos is its usability. The search functionality has significantly improved but if I need to find something quickly, I still use Google to search the Internet. Then when I gathered more information, I go back to Logos. Google just seems to know what I am looking for by just typing in a few words. I know that Logos does not have the user base of Google, but in the end, we have come to expect such smart search engines. Faithlife Assistant is not the solution for me.

    Let me show you just one example of lack of usability. I want to investigate a topic, so I go to Logos Guides and type in "topic". Then I get 12 options:

    If I type a specific topic into the Go bar, I get another 10+ options. So I have a total of over 20 options to search for a topic. Then I need to start researching which option is the best. At this point, many people give up. My nephew (a 28 years old smart guy) is one of them.

    I am aware that Logos is an extremely powerful tool but we have come to expect tools to work without having to go through extensive help files. 

    My hope is that Logos one day becomes so easy to use that occasional basic users can easily navigate through it. And expert users can get into all the nuances. 

    Armin

    PS: The workflows were a huge step forward. Many thanks!

    My main criticism of Logos is its usability. The search functionality has significantly improved but if I need to find something quickly, I still use Google to search the Internet. Then when I gathered more information, I go back to Logos. Google just seems to know what I am looking for by just typing in a few words.

    I have a feeling this is never going to change.

    ASUS  ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti

    "The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not."  Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.

    My main criticism of Logos is its usability. The search functionality has significantly improved but if I need to find something quickly, I still use Google to search the Internet. Then when I gathered more information, I go back to Logos. Google just seems to know what I am looking for by just typing in a few words.

    Yes, I do the same



    Unfortunately this is true for ALL Bible software programs. I myself search also often first with Startpage.com and then I go to the Bible software program. 

    Greetings

    Fabian

    Χριστὸς ἐν ὑμῖν, ἡ ἐλπὶς τῆς δόξης· 

    I'm an outlier, so much of this isn't in my purview, but on this point...

    Should the message focus on: Integration with biblical content / education? The integrated platform (no more five accounts to manage)?

    I'm assuming you are referencing Logos/Verbum/Faithlife Ebooks/etc. (if not, let me know and/or ignore my comment). I never really liked the separation, and would like one search to bring up everything that is within FL's stable. I'm just not going to run 2-3 or more searches for titles I'm looking to purchase.

    The main thing I'm looking for is...to paraphrase Neo..."Titles...lot's of titles." There are numerous series from a variety of publishers that I would like to see available in Logos. I realize De Gruyter titles were offered at one time and they didn't gain much traction, but there are STUPENDOUS monographs on SPECTACULAR topics published by De Gruyter and they should be available in Logos format. The necessary ingredient to make it all work would be to get the publisher to follow the Bloomsbury path of offering their nose-bleed-priced-resources for 80-90% discounts to a market that will otherwise NEVER purchase their titles. Make their $100-300 titles available for $10-30 each and I will buy tons of them. But up to now, and for probably EVER, I won't buy a single book for $100 or more. I WILL BUY thousands of dollars worth of books, though, if I'm getting great value.

    Get Eisenbraun's Siphrut series. Get the many SBL monograph series. Their are tons of great monograph series...GET THEM.

    GET VETUS TESTAMENTUM & NOVUM TESTAMENTUM (and tons of other serious academic journals)...which are quoted thousands of times in Logos resources. Yeah, I know Brill doesn't want to...BUT CONVINCE THEM OF THE ERROR OF THEIR WAYS. The utility of these journals is ratcheted up geometrically, even exponentially, when they are hyperlinked to citations. I OWN the Bloomsbury collection...tons of Sheffield and T&T Clark titles...BECAUSE they were made affordable IN LOGOS. I don't own a single copy of VT or NT (even though I would love to and would benefit from them) because they are stupidly expensive and a serious pain to acquire...and they aren't searchable or linked to my library.

    I'm probably way off topic, but you are asking about what would get us to "invest" more in FL and on that account I am very old school. I want MORE HYPERLINKED TITLES.

    ASUS  ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti

    "The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not."  Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.

    The integrated platform (no more five accounts to manage)?

    I re-read this section of your post again, and I think I completely misread and misunderstood what you were saying. Like I said...just ignore.

    ASUS  ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti

    "The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not."  Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.

    The main thing I'm looking for is...to paraphrase Neo..."Titles...lot's of titles." There are numerous series from a variety of publishers that I would like to see available in Logos. I realize De Gruyter titles were offered at one time and they didn't gain much traction, but there are STUPENDOUS monographs on SPECTACULAR topics published by De Gruyter and they should be available in Logos format. The necessary ingredient to make it all work would be to get the publisher to follow the Bloomsbury path of offering their nose-bleed-priced-resources for 80-90% discounts to a market that will otherwise NEVER purchase their titles. Make their $100-300 titles available for $10-30 each and I will buy tons of them. But up to now, and for probably EVER, I won't buy a single book for $100 or more. I WILL BUY thousands of dollars worth of books, though, if I'm getting great value.

    The problem is that these publishers are used to selling to libraries with lots of members that can afford to spend $1000 on a set that will be shared by several hundred members. The cost per member is very small.  If we could get them to sell these sets to us at the cost per member that a library pays their sales just might skyrocket.  

    Bob, once again you have demonstrated your transparency and desire for specific feedback. I too am a long-time user of Logos personally but somehow I've never been able to successfully introduce it to our church, and you would think with someone who loves Logos so much that would be easy.

    In reading the above comments carefully, I think the suggestions that Mark offers in his post above might actually make a difference where you can offer attractive options for small churches, probably done so through a modular system.

    The other challenge that I have noticed is that people don't like to change once they find something that works, even if it is not perfect. Church staff and key volunteers don't want to go through the pain of transitioning into a new system and so carry on with what they have. In order to break through this ceiling, the product or service has to appear much better and there must be a person who is willing to go through the struggles of learning something new. So whatever you offer, it really needs to be very simple and probably not more money than they are already spending.

    I've worked for a Christian not-for-profit for almost 4 decades and part of our ministry is to offer a facility for church youth groups to do retreat. Many Christians are notorious for wanting the world but not being willing to pay for it. I think the same is true for churches considering software for their ministries. The product or service might be an amazing deal but the price point must be low enough to at least initially attract them. Hence that's why I think the modular system suggested by Mark might be worth considering. 

    All the best as you try to navigate this next stage of growth for Faithlife.

    Using adventure and community to challenge young people to continually say "yes" to God

    So whatever you offer, it really needs to be very simple and probably not more money than they are already spending.

    Adding to Bruce's points:

    1. Change in a church is very similar to change in a company; it has to solve something about to fail. And it needs a champion that people finally agree to.  Else, someone just digs in.

    2. FL has selected to appeal to the higher end of the market. I'd assume the mentioned competition has targeted the low hanging fruit. I'd start well above the smaller churches, but below the big ones. Then expand both directions.

    3. My observation here, and traveling, churches are consolidating. This will sound bad, but younger pastors are consciously strategizing to be the end-point, especially in healthy but smaller communities. Our pastor was quite insistent, as well as several others I talked to.  

    4. I'd really highlight the geeky-guy (usually). The main argument for a consolidated offering, is training (usually volunteers), and support. Predictability.  The fragmented this and that is a nightmare for the geeky-guy.

    5. As already noted, the ability to introduce a single module is critical. Foot in the door. Trying to sell a complete system is best viewed as a disaster.

    6. Finally, my opinion, but concentrate on the younger populated churches. They'll see the benefit far quicker.

    "If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.

    The main thing I'm looking for is...to paraphrase Neo..."Titles...lot's of titles."

    We love this too... but we're finding that the more academic the title, the fewer the customers -- at almost any price point. (That's why some of these are so expensive in print, too.) The unit sales on some of these can be 50 copies... and it's hard to make the math work on text processing at that point. Let alone the overhead in time involved in licensing/discussion/etc. We're working on ways to streamline our book production costs even more so that we can get titles without huge audiences to pencil out, but it's an ongoing challenge.

    Bloomsbury was willing to find a very creative solution in our partnership, but it was a bold move I'm not sure other publishers would do... though we can try a little harder....

    Bloomsbury was willing to find a very creative solution in our partnership, but it was a bold move I'm not sure other publishers would do... though we can try a little harder....

    This, please. Your inspiration: Lk. 18:4, 5.

    Wear them out.

    Just to be clear...

    Please target:

    Brill (VT & NT & Supplements)
    Sage (Interpretation: J. of Bib. & Theol.)
    SBL (numerous series; in particular, their dissertation series could benefit greatly from a typesetting improvement by moving to Logos)
    De Gruyter (all Bible-related monographs)
    Eisenbrauns (Siphrut series; Bulletin for Biblical Research Supplements; etc.)
    Peter Lang (Studies in Biblical Literature series)
    ...I could name plenty more--snag one or more of these, and I will make other suggestions.

    With De Gruyter and Lang, and to some extent Eisenbrauns, might I suggest that the publishers offer a kind of Chinese menu approach, where Logos customers can choose 5, 10, 15, or so titles from some of these very large series, for a set discount rate. I suspect that would draw FAR MORE attention than pre-ordained cookie-cutter collections that only have one or two desired titles in a 10-15 title collection.

    For example, the Siphrut series by Eisenbrauns currently has about 20 titles...

    Pick 5...20% off
    Pick 10...40% off
    Pick 15...60% off
    Pick 20...80% off

    FL, through Logos, is providing an entirely untapped market of potential buyers of these deep study titles...IF the publishers will get their heads out of their rumps and recognize and accept the opportunity. They can get lots of unexpected money, or sit and brick it all out because "yesterday's reasons". I'm prepared to spend K's on these series in Logos if the value is right...Bloomsbury right. Tell the Euros that the ugly Americans have euros to spend (so to speak).

    ASUS  ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti

    "The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not."  Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.

    For example, the Siphrut series by Eisenbrauns currently has about 20 titles...

    Pick 5...20% off
    Pick 10...40% off
    Pick 15...60% off
    Pick 20...80% off

    How would that work?  That is do I have to pick all 20 now or can I pick them up over time?

    That is I buy 5 now at 20% off.  If next year I buy 5 more do I get them at 40% off [I now own 10] or only 20% [I only bought 5 now]

    Then, after reading and using the first 10, I buy the rest (last 10).  Do I get them at 40% off or 80% off?  [Again I now own 20 but only bought 10 now]

    That is do I get the discount on what I buy now or my total count over time?

    the more academic the title, the fewer the customers

    Just wonder whether some of us users with the required expertise could do the tagging on voluntary basis for free in those cases.

    Also I would guess some users with developer or GIS skills might be willing to volunteer in some projects.

    Gold package, and original language material and ancient text material, SIL and UBS books, discourse Hebrew OT and Greek NT. PC with Windows 11

    Slightly off topic, but I just wanted to respond to those of you who have had a hard time getting others to use Logos. I had the same frustration for a while, evangelizing Logos to everyone I know, but I was persistent and am having pretty good results now. My dad bought his very first laptop and is learning to use a computer just so that he can use Logos!

    So what was my secret? Show them the awesome potential of Logos and then teach them how to use it! Also, tell them that the basic program is free and that they only pay for the books and packages that they want. 

    I have been teaching a "How to use Logos" class for several months now. I started with a presentation showing off its potential one Sunday morning and then stated that I would be teaching a weekly class to anyone interested. The "core" of our small church (those who come to 2+ services a week) are almost all in my Logos class. And several have already become paying customers (Dad got Silver). It took time and persistence (and a lot of hand holding), but they are catching the vision of how Logos can enhance their study of God's word.

    Passionate Logos users (us) are potentially the best Logos salesmen. We just need to help others to see that the payoff is well worth the investment of time in learning to use the software (as we, obviously, have already seen for ourselves). 

    Hi Bob 

    Thanks for sharing and asking the questions.

    I believe that tools to help with ”church management” are important but I’m not sure that the fully integrated model you seem to be outlining here is something I would recommend to our church. I like the concept but its not starting from “where we are”.

    Looking at the pricing page it seems that churches can get access to a lot of functionality for a ”bundled price” but they may already have a lot of the components in place.

    For example, the starting price point is $104-125 per month but a church may already have a website, and a sermon repository and simply want to add in church management software. One of the leading companies in the UK offers this for £45-£46 per month.

    Implementing this in a previous church it was very easy to link their calendaring tool to our main website and it is these sorts of integration that I expect will be important.

    Do you intend to “break things up” into smaller components even at the risk of easier integration?

    One essential requirement in the UK (and across Europe) is that any tools are GDPR-compliant, otherwise I expect the takeup to be very limited or non-existent.

    Graham

    Thank you, Bob. I use Logos Bible Software personally, and we use (and love) Proclaim. I've previously investigated church management software, and we used a service for 6 months or so, but it never met our needs. A 'must-have' for me is a facility to record pastoral visits and make confidential notes on those visits.

    We're a smallish church (50 members) and smaller churches don't need many of the functions a typical church management software service provides. In smaller churches, communication is much easier. A WhatsApp group, or even group text or email is very easy. Our teams look after themselves, as we don't have enough people to need complex rotas. If you're on the team, you're on duty!

    The digital learning stuff is really interesting, but our demographics make it difficult. We have a number of older members who don't have smart phones or smart TVs and wouldn't be interested in the technology. For the same reason we need to do a printed bulletin, so the Faithlife newsletter doesn't appeal.

    The website is potentially useful, especially if events, etc. integrate well into Proclaim. However, we have twelve years worth of sermons (1,300 sermons) on our existing site, and unless there's a one-click import of those, we're tied to our existing solution. We'd also be looking for an export feature, so we don't get tied into the platform.

    Even at the cheapest option, Equip would cost us $1,000 a year. Because we already pay $200 for Proclaim, that's $800 more. But we could use only a handful of the features.

    If you're going to attract churches like ours, you would need to do at least one of the following:

    1. Offer a modular system, whereby we could choose which parts we wanted.
    2. Reduce the costs for smaller churches in recognition that small churches have far fewer problems that CMSs can solve.
    3. Offer sermon import to websites, and pastoral visitation to the CMS.

    This is my personal Faithlife account. On 1 March 2022, I started working for Faithlife, and have a new 'official' user account. Posts on this account shouldn't be taken as official Faithlife views!

    If you're going to attract churches like ours, you would need to do at least one of the following:

    1. Offer a modular system, whereby we could choose which parts we wanted.
    2. Reduce the costs for smaller churches in recognition that small churches have far fewer problems that CMSs can solve.
    3. Offer sermon import to websites, and pastoral visitation to the CMS.

    I had decided not to reply because almost everything here doesn't apply to my current church because of our size, but Mark hit most of the nail on the head for me. I'm sure you know the stats about how many churches are small, etc. Therefore, most of these things just don't apply to us. Plus, to make matters less appealing for us, we're represent an older demographic and many of your offerings really seem to appeal to a more conservative group. (E.g., while there might be movies on FLTV that some of our people would watch, there aren't many.) I'm not asking you to change who you are, but I'm just saying many of these things don't apply to where we are now or where we're heading. (As an aside, I'm a recovery specialist, and we won't be small and older forever. But for the present, that's where we're at.)

    Also as an aside, I happen to agree with David Paul above in that offering NT and VT (and other, as he says, "serious" academic titles; I started using Logos eons ago for that express purpose) would be a major win. We're no doubt in a slender minority.

    If you're going to attract churches like ours, you would need to do at least one of the following:

    1. Offer a modular system, whereby we could choose which parts we wanted.
    2. Reduce the costs for smaller churches in recognition that small churches have far fewer problems that CMSs can solve.
    3. Offer sermon import to websites, and pastoral visitation to the CMS.

    We're going to offer as much as we can for free to very small churches. (Already much of the Faithlife system works for free... and we are planning a model where you only need to pay at certain volumes of data/email sends, etc. which should let very small churches use it at no cost.O)

    We'll think more about the modular idea, but the thinking right now is to bundle everything at such a good price that it's smarter than modular. Some components will be sold stand-alone (Proclaim, Sites, Giving, Logos, Faithlife TV for Churches), but most are so tightly integrated that we think there's better value in a get-it-all-price, like Amazon Prime.

    I'm going to talk with the team about batch sermon import. I know we can do it for you manually, but we should look into ways to let people manage that themselves. What format would you have the data in? An Excel/CSV file with filenames? Would you want to batch-upload all the audio or videos? Send URLs to where they are already online?

    I'm going to talk with the team about batch sermon import. I know we can do it for you manually, but we should look into ways to let people manage that themselves. What format would you have the data in? An Excel/CSV file with filenames? Would you want to batch-upload all the audio or videos? Send URLs to where they are already online?

    A CSV files with URLs would suit me best. I wouldn't want to download all my MP3s and then re-upload them.

    This is my personal Faithlife account. On 1 March 2022, I started working for Faithlife, and have a new 'official' user account. Posts on this account shouldn't be taken as official Faithlife views!

    Mark Barnes has already hit some of the issues with small churches (and done an excellent job of communicating our concerns as well). Additionally, we are in a rural community where cell service and broadband are sketchy at best. Our people are not the native users of technology that the upcoming generation is reported to be (even our high school is pitiful in the use of Social media  because it is not the "go to" method of communication that our teens use.

    We are "all in" on Faithlife. I use Logos, we are loving Proclaim, We are on Faithlife Giving (as a trial for our first year of Proclaim), we host sermons on our Faithlife site and we are currently entering data into Ministry Tracker as our first attempt to get this church on a ChMS. Honestly, the Faithlife TV and Mobile Ed offerings do not add value to what our people want and (While they offer content that some may want) they add cost and put the Faithlife Church Packages out of reach for a rural congregation under 100 people.

    I think Mark Barnes is on to something with his modular ideas.

    (Bonus: as a small church we don't need to integrate midi lighting cues that seem to be a considerable demand on the Proclaim customer support people [:D])

    Making Disciples! Logos Ecosystem = LogosMax on Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Win11), Android app on tablet, FSB on iPhone & iPad mini, Proclaim (Proclaim Remote on Fire Tablet).

    I agree wholeheartedly with Graham’s sentiments. I would add that our church uses Proclaim and I use Logos, but we will not be moving our website any time soon even if you said, “here’s all you need for free for life” just because what we pay is so low and so under utilized by the congregation and pure area that. I’m a single staff church member and we have no one to enter info into a church management website so same holds true for that. When you have a small number of people, you can keep track of them informally or using what you already have with an excel spreadsheet. To add something else without a person dedicated to maintaining this just adds one more responsibility to an already over worked congregation trying to maintain everything but the pastoral duties with volunteers.

    Thanks however. 

    Dr. Kevin Purcell, Director of Missions
    Brushy Mountain Baptist Association

    www.kevinpurcell.org

    I agree wholeheartedly with Graham’s sentiments. I would add that our church uses Proclaim and I use Logos, but we will not be moving our website any time soon even if you said, “here’s all you need for free for life” just because what we pay is so low and so under utilized by the congregation and pure area that. I’m a single staff church member and we have no one to enter info into a church management website so same holds true for that. When you have a small number of people, you can keep track of them informally or using what you already have with an excel spreadsheet. To add something else without a person dedicated to maintaining this just adds one more responsibility to an already over worked congregation trying to maintain everything but the pastoral duties with volunteers.

    One of our goals is to make the Faithlife Equip ChMS functionality as easy to use as using Excel... and to offer enough extra value that it's easier, and helps you be more effective in your ministry. In the same way, we hope to change the conversation about church websites from "Not that important because they get so little use" to "Now so useful that they get used by our members AND help us bring more people into the church."

    We're not there yet, but I'll take this as a challenge. :-)

    As always, Bob, thanks for allowing the users to give input. Here's my assessment:

    We are a church of about 200. If I recall correctly, the majority of churches are 100 or smaller. Even at our church size, we don't need a lot of the products in equip. We use a hodge-podge of software; mostly free stuff, not as integrated as equip but definitely cheaper. I wonder if the whole package is more gear towards the mega-church? I can see all the staff using the professional services of FL. However, I personally think the services for the "whole church" will be a hard sell. People are fickle and like to go with the most popular software (Facebook, Instagram, YouVersion App, Kindle...). Churches are also evangelistic and want there people to be on these platforms to reach unbelievers.

    Logos: A couple of the leaders use Logos. The learning curve on Logos as a professional geared service makes it hard to get the whole church on board.

    Logos Mobile Apps: This is where most of the "whole church" would use your Bible software. It has a lot of potential, however it is just not there yet in its ease of use and bells/whistles that people would want to give up their YouVersion app (More audio bibles, better reading plans). The app is definitely ahead of most in different areas. Just needs lots of polishing. Some suggestions: Easier 1 Click Word Studying and Copying https://community.logos.com/forums/t/180147.aspx#1040358 https://community.logos.com/forums/t/181522.aspx Reference Scanner Exports: https://community.logos.com/forums/t/156244.aspx Read Aloud Andriod: https://community.logos.com/forums/t/178938.aspx

    Courses: More Academic than most church members could stand (from what I've seen).

    Proclaim: We have considered using Proclaim, however it wasn't the right timing since we invested in upgrading another software. Though, we will probably move to Proclaim eventually. Logos and Proclaim are both "professional" software. That is an easier sell in a church because only the leaders or tech people have to adopt.

    Sites: This is a good idea for smaller churches. Seems like it is still in beta, though, with not a lot of ways to customize.

    FL TV: In a service like FLTV content is king. Churches will use the services that have the discipleship content that they want to go through with their church or their people want to watch...etc.

    Those are my ramblings. I hope they are helpful!

    Bob,  thank you for the opportunity for input here. Since much of the input given so far has come from the perspective of smaller attendance/budget churches (which is the overwhelming majority), I will speak to this from the perspective of a senior pastor of a church with 600+ in attendance and $2 million budget.  Larger established churches will tend to have long histories with a particular church management software that handles their people, financials, and scheduling.  They will be very reluctant to move away from these platforms due to history, investment, and the availability of support and infrastructure from those companies. 

    I will say that for what you are offering, if all of these services are excellent, your pricing would be a steal even if it were double the initial pricing.  You will have to sell value.

    In my opinion, the two types of churches that you are most likely to have sign up for this service are smaller churches who get a tremendous amount of services in one place for a low price and churches that are growing into "mid-size" who have seen the need for church management software and other services but who haven't yet gotten into the ecosystem of another company.

    Finally, as a loyal, ten year Logos Bible Software user, I hope that these new ventures do not ultimately erode the viability of that core business and my personal investment in it.  That is always in the back of everyone's mind. However, business models change. We all understand that.

    I think the easiest thing to cut would be the web app.  If someone has the money to purchase Logos, chances are they will have a desktop, laptop, or mobile device with Logos installed, making the web app superfluous.  Honestly, I only used the web app once, and only for a few minutes while I was reinstalling Logos onto a new computer...  I really can't think of a reason why anyone would use the web app on a regular basis if they already have it downloaded.

    I really can't think of a reason why anyone would use the web app on a regular basis if they already have it downloaded.

    The app is their testbed for desktop development (in theory), and supports all the environments that need the full treatment, but are not Windows/Mac. I pulled my PC offline; no desire to replace. I'd use the app, but they ignore user edits in the library. So, who knows. They wander around a lot.

    "If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.

    All the new things Faithlife is doing are fine by me, but it assumes a bigger congregation than the one I currently attend. We are still Jurassic in things you are creating.

    As long as all the new stuff doesn't draw resources away from Logos Bible, I am happy for Faithlife in trying to serve the church. I am often reminded about Solomon and all his wives leading him astray. As long as that doesn't happen with Faithlife, that's good.

    The mind of man is the mill of God, not to grind chaff, but wheat. Thomas Manton | Study hard, for the well is deep, and our brains are shallow. Richard Baxter

    I really can't think of a reason why anyone would use the web app on a regular basis if they already have it downloaded.

    I have the desktop version but use the web app when I am working on my Chromebook away from my office. It functions better than the android app in many situations. Plus it is faster. My personal usage is roughly 3 times per week. However, there are some (probably a very small number) who solely use Chromebooks that would be impacted by the removal of the web app.

    I really appreciate the transparency with which Bob runs their business, and I understand the need to adjust to changing market conditions.

    This is going to come across more negative than I intend it, so try to read this generously...

    I've got well into 5 figures spent with FL (the vast majority on Logos resources), and I have the FL Now subscription. I love Logos, use it almost daily, promote it, try to help where I have time, etc. So I'm financially and mentally / emotionally invested.

    When I read Bob's post about their plans and where they're trying to make decisions,...
    and when I couple that with the new products / markets they've ventured into over the last ~5 years,...
    and when I couple *that* with the enhancements they're making to the Logos product itself...

    It makes me seriously consider switching to Acc*nce. I'm a pastor, and none of those products / markets are of any interest to me. (I looked into sites and online giving, but they weren't competitive). I don't believe I'm using any of the major features from L8. I love the desktop product, but it's being taken to places that I don't think I'll ever go with features that I'll never use. I should also add that I love the mobile app - I read from it to the tune of hours per week.

    I'd like to think I'm FL's target market - seminary grad, pastor, daily/weekly working in original languages, sermon prep each week, regularly reading books and journals, plus a technologist for 30+ years. But maybe I'm really not.

    My $.02 ...

    Donnie

    A couple of thoughts from overseas (well, the UK...):

    • In the UK a number of churches won’t pay a subscription unless they see it as worth it. So companies like PlanningCenter do well because they have a certain free tier. That means that a lot of churches will then think of them when they do want something that costs - maybe Faithlife can do similar?
    • The other thing is that the current companies don’t do a good job of localisation. In the UK we have to use US English for things (which isn’t major, but doesn’t look good), and use terms that we don’t use elsewhere (like Kindergarten etc.) Good localisation would do wonders for reaching the overseas market. 

    (I looked into sites and online giving, but they weren't competitive).

    I'd love to know in which areas we need to improve. or what you saw ask the weak parts of our Sites and Giving products.

    (I looked into sites and online giving, but they weren't competitive).

    I'd love to know in which areas we need to improve. or what you saw ask the weak parts of our Sites and Giving products.

    For Giving:

    1. Better reporting, such as customizable daily reports via email of the previous day's giving.

    2. Better customization of receipt / thank you notices for giving. Right now it is very limited.

    For Sites:

    1. A preformatted Staff page.

    2. More flexibility on page layouts.

    3. A forms tool.

    4. Better alignment of pictures around text. Right now when you insert pictures around text, the top of the picture is in between two lines of text rather than aligned with one line of text. 

    5. More widget

    6. Most importantly, less integration with Faithlife.com. For example, host blog posts on the webpage, and not on FL. We have a lot of older members, and they don't like needing a FL account to access features of the website.

    Myke Harbuck
    Lead Pastor, www.ByronCity.Church
    Adjunct Professor, Georgia Military College

    Deleted

    Bob,

    I enjoy your transparency with everything y'all do at Faithlife. However, most of the newer changes for the church I pastor, which is small (50-70 on Sunday Mornings) are a moot point for us, because our internet service where we live is almost non-existent (satellite internet, which really cannot fall under the realm of "high speed" as it claims). 

    So, I am going to keep reading and looking at all of this, and once REAL high speed internet gets here, maybe integrate these into our local church. 

    -Jon

    Pastor, Mt. Leonard Baptist Church, SBC

    Bob, it seems that you want to sell stuff, including websites, to churches. OK. As you know, the most efficient way to do this is to sell to a large number of churches all at once.

    One good question to ask is, "Where do I find large groups (hundreds or at least dozens) of churches--especially those with no website or terrible websites--in pre-assembled groups with a central decision-making entity that can sign up and pay for every single one of those churches all at once?"

    Oooh! I know the answer! It's painful, but I do: the Catholic Church in the USA and Canada. Market to bishops and their dioceses.

    Talk with your Verbum staff. Most Catholic parishes presently have either no website or a terrible website and/or a website that doesn't get updated because it's a pain to do so... and/or even the pastor and current staff don't have the relevant password(s).

    “The trouble is that everyone talks about reforming others and no one thinks about reforming himself.” St. Peter of Alcántara

    Right now, Equip ‘Early Access’ is an amazing deal… and I’m surprised every Logos user hasn’t gotten their church onto Faithlife TV for Churches (https://faithlifetv.com/church), because it’s worth it for the Mobile Ed courses alone… and Faithlife Giving (https://giving.faithlife.com/) is fantastic and will be super-well integrated with the whole platform. I hope you’ll check it out.

    If our church subscribes to the FaithLifeTV, how does each user log into the content? Does each person have a separate log-in? I am wondering if there is a way to allow each user to bookmark content, not having to start over mid viewing of a video, etc. Possibly the new users would purchase the Basic Logos and set up a login. BTW, what is included in the Basic package? I don't see any listing for the content.

    I am facilitating a college age class starting in August, and would like to use the FaithLife TV and Mobile Ed content occasionally.

    If our church subscribes to the FaithLifeTV, how does each user log into the content? Does each person have a separate log-in?

    Yes, church subscribers would use their Faithlife account to access FaithlifeTV content.

    I am wondering if there is a way to allow each user to bookmark content, not having to start over mid viewing of a video, etc.

    On Logos, Mobile Ed courses can be bookmarked following these instructions: https://support.logos.com/hc/en-us/articles/360016517871-Favorites-Bookmarks. On FaithlifeTV, viewing progress is saved, so content will start where you left off. Also, we are currently developing a feature so users can store content inside a separate 'Watchlist' category.

    I am facilitating a college age class starting in August, and would like to use the FaithLife TV and Mobile Ed content occasionally.

    I think https://faithlifetv.com/church would be the best solution.

    If our church subscribes to the FaithLifeTV, how does each user log into the content? Does each person have a separate log-in?

    Yes, church subscribers would use their Faithlife account to access FaithlifeTV content.

    I am wondering if there is a way to allow each user to bookmark content, not having to start over mid viewing of a video, etc.

    On Logos, Mobile Ed courses can be bookmarked following these instructions: https://support.logos.com/hc/en-us/articles/360016517871-Favorites-Bookmarks. On FaithlifeTV, viewing progress is saved, so content will start where you left off. Also, we are currently developing a feature so users can store content inside a separate 'Watchlist' category.

    I am facilitating a college age class starting in August, and would like to use the FaithLife TV and Mobile Ed content occasionally.

    I think https://faithlifetv.com/church would be the best solution.

    Thanks for all the information. Now to sell the FaithLifeTV to my church family.

    This might seem negative, but it is not intended that way.

    I question some of the things that you throw development resources at and wonder if there isn't a bit too much bloat at Faithlife. Do we really need a web version of the software? I have never used it and probably never will. Desktop and mobile, yes.

    On a similar note, I tried to use the Sermon Editor this week for my sermon prep and found myself frustrated by a lack of basic formatting options. It seems half-baked to me. Why develop a tool if you aren't going to do it right? I wonder if anyone is using the sermon tool. I finally gave up and exported my work to Word. One has to question the value of trying to recreate a Word processor and Presentation tool inside Logos. Microsoft has already done a pretty good job. It would make more sense to integrate with those tools.

    Canvas? Do I really need a drawing/diagramming tool in my bible software when there are so many good options on the market?

    I like the idea of a church management system, but I would like to see it functioning before I recommended it. Do you support online giving / payment transactions in Canada? This is becoming a crowded space, but Logos has a good base to build on with all it's bible focussed resources.

    Do we really need a web version of the software? I have never used it and probably never will. Desktop and mobile, yes.

    Happily, there is a very real market for the online version, that market is growing, and it does post on the forums.

    I wonder if anyone is using the sermon tool.

    Yes, people are using it.

    “The trouble is that everyone talks about reforming others and no one thinks about reforming himself.” St. Peter of Alcántara

    I wonder if anyone is using the sermon tool.

    The power in the sermon editor is it's automatic export to powerpoint/proclaim and FL Sermons. It saves me hours every time I teach. Formatting really shouldn't be done in the sermon editor. You sermon really should be bullet points and references and the theme should handle the style of your presentation.

    Though, I do agree with the premise that some features in Logos should be improved and fully baked before new ones are introduced. It's Bob's prerogative where he spends his development dollars. I do see how it can be beneficial to invest their capital in core features that would introduce everyday Bible users into the FL platform. However, the "Logos Pro" seems to be their core customer and also the best entry into the everyday bible user market.

    On a similar note, I tried to use the Sermon Editor this week for my sermon prep and found myself frustrated by a lack of basic formatting options. It seems half-baked to me.

    We avoided Sermon Editor for years because we didn't want to have to re-create a word processor... but we did it when we thought there was enough unique value in the smooth integration of slide building, sermon export, etc.

    We did choose to go with a semi-structured editor, to allow style-based formatting (as opposed to full free form styling).

    What formatting options are missing that you would you like added?

    On a similar note, I tried to use the Sermon Editor this week for my sermon prep and found myself frustrated by a lack of basic formatting options. It seems half-baked to me.

    We avoided Sermon Editor for years because we didn't want to have to re-create a word processor... but we did it when we thought there was enough unique value in the smooth integration of slide building, sermon export, etc.

    We did choose to go with a semi-structured editor, to allow style-based formatting (as opposed to full free form styling).

    What formatting options are missing that you would you like added?

    I've been working with it a bit more this week and worked through most of my frustrations, by doing things differently, but these are still a problem for me.

    1) I like to be able to markup scripture so I can remember to hit on specific things when I am preaching. I could copy the scripture text into the editor, but that sort of defeats the purpose of the scripture functionality, one of the main selling features.

    2) It is really awkward to move stuff around, especially the scriptures. I usually end up deleting and re-adding scripture and slides.

    3) Undo functionality

    These items are not unique to me. Everything else, I can deal with, though, I would love to be able to print/export thumbnails of the slides with my notes.

    2) It is really awkward to move stuff around, especially the scriptures. I usually end up deleting and re-adding scripture and slides.

    3) Undo functionality

    These items are not unique to me. Everything else, I can deal with, though, I would love to be able to print/export thumbnails of the slides with my notes.

    I echo all 3 of these frustrations, however I would prioritize in reverse order.

    1. print thumbnails

    2. easy to "undo"

    3. sometimes when I switch from one template to another (or change from "header" to "content") I have to rekey text because text boxes disappear

    Making Disciples! Logos Ecosystem = LogosMax on Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Win11), Android app on tablet, FSB on iPhone & iPad mini, Proclaim (Proclaim Remote on Fire Tablet).

    Hi Bob,

    I started using Logos when I was in seminary (1992-1995). I remember buying the diskettes and taking them home to install them. Faithlife has certainly come a long way since those days. For the most part I've been happy with the changes. 

    While my undergrad was in Math and Computer Science from the University of Waterloo, I often feel at a loss when using the functionality of Logos. I know it is more powerful than my knowledge base on the product allows.

    I more than understand the need for businesses to grow and develop -- the church does and seems to be awful at realizing that at times.

    I think the direction you're going in is great. Integrating the events in my congregation's Faithlife community into Proclaim and the Digital Signage saves me a lot of time. Being able to embed the Digital Signage into my own website allows for our page to seem up to date without much effort. Being able to write sermons in Logos (not an original feature) and export them into Proclaim (not an original product) saved huge amounts of time. I'm happy.

    I serve a very small (by American standards) congregation in the Greater Toronto Area. Average weekly attendance about 70. My administrative assistant works 12-15 hours per week. Anything that saves time is a god-send.

    My congregation is also very aged. We're working with a consultant to determine what our future will be. There's no guarantee that the future won't be "lock the doors and sell". I think there's other possibilities in the rapidly changing church landscape, but it is a congregational decision and not mine to impose.

    We've had very little uptake with the additional services you offer. We tried running a couple of online bible studies through the Faithlife community with almost no success. I've tried to get people to download the Proclaim app to push notifications of events to their devices -- one person has (other than me.)

    Checking in for us doesn't require an app -- we're so small that we can look around the room and see who is here.

    Our music comes almost entirely out of our denominational worship book (I'm not saying that's a good thing just describing the reality), and I often the songs accessible in Proclaim are not ours (I've entered ours and they are saved for reuse).

    My sermons are nothing great. I have no following (other than the few Luddites who are my members) who would want to read / listen to my thoughts.

    In five years of online giving being available for us, we've had one donation that way.

    We're so small that our facility use is literally written on a wall calendar -- and I can't remember a time in 13 years that we've double booked something.

    I would love better integration of events across calendars and email however when we used Faithlife to send out newsletters we had very few takers (we had to revert to our previous provider but we're small enough that we don't need to pay a bill in bananas.)

    I would be ecstatic with shared reading plans, and digital bulletins, but again my people just don't engage in that way.

    Some of the Community features of Equip look interesting to me -- but given our history, I'm not sure how many people will engage that way.

    As I review all this, it is sounding horribly negative, and that wasn't my intent when starting my response. I really do think you do an excellent job (and at one point really wanted to apply for a job at Faithlife but the whole green card thing is a problem). I hope and pray that you will continue to grow the business and meet the ever changing needs of the church.

    I started using Logos when I was in seminary (1992-1995).

    Thanks for sticking with us so long! I do get the point about a really small church -- at a certain size, you don't need many tools. And that's fine, and also why we're making so much of the Faithlife platform free, so small churches can use what's helpful without a big cost. A lot of the functionality is 'free to test', but a small church can live in that zone just fine.

    Forgive me for not replying to each and every reply so far in this thread. I have had this item on my things list for a couple of weeks but I wanted to give it more than a brief look. 

    1. I use Logos, along with other tools. 
    2. My church uses an older "presentation" program. By older I mean the buy/own mode. Old also means in need of upgrade. We also use a common congregational communication's program. It  costs roughly half what Faithlife Equip would...but is a single use tool.
    3. I like the comments about modularity. that would allow us to pick what we need now with the option to add more as it becomes needed. The price for our size congregation is in line with what other venders offer. Not every product is apples to apples, but when there is a valid comparison the prices are all in the same ball park.
    4. We do have a lot of people who would leverage some of the other tools. About a third to a half of our church will be on phone/tablet during Sunday School and or Church.
    5. Using Bob's tactful comments I did some research. (That's why it took me while...needed free time to look). Because I don't run a company I can be somewhat less gracious than Bob. (though I'm Bob too). Venture Capital is mounting a hostile take over of the CMS industry. What was particularly enlightening was reading comments on Glassdoor and similar sites. Employee's feel abused, misled, and directionless...
    6. The Equity/Exit model of Venture Capital creates a dynamic space for technology companies to grow. CMS technology companies comprise a vertical market with, honestly, limited room for certain kinds of innovation. The venture model is great for individuals who are willing to make a high-stakes wager on themselves. (other shoe falling) It is not so great when you have other stake holders who may possibly gain if the bet succeeds, but who will be immeasurably harmed should it fail. For example...if I as a small church pastor sell my Elders on a CMS solution only to discover that the company is a subsidiary of a VC firm that, having gobbled up the competition is now in a position to raise prices with little threat to their business....I might get fired, we stop using a CMS...And having exited it may be years before my gun-shy board ever uses such a product again. The VC chokehold on the CMS conglomerate will likely hurt churches.

    I am grateful that Bob has not only been transparent but that he has provided tools that have helped my preaching, teaching, and study. Yeah, I have had some gripes over the years...as I have had with my wife as well. (lol) At this point I don't know if our church is ready to make a move to Faithlife Equip...But I do know that when we do we've got a friend and champion in the business.

    As some are telling how their church could use Faithlife I will report:

    Faithlife will never work in my local church - reason: cost.   Have about 70 members per week but we can only get about 20 to attend the study before worship.

    A one named user for Logos would not work as the Pastor and the six Elders rotate preaching duties.   

    Presentations: Powerpoint [pay once when buying new computer].  Visiting preachers bring theirs on a flash drive - and often arrive five minutes before service. [Some are early and also attend the study before worship.  They use a free Bible program to copy the Scripture reading into powerpoint on the Scripture slide.

    Our denomination provided text files of all the hymns in our hymn book in a Word format easy to copy into the powerpoint hymn slides.   

    Bulletin done in Word.     Noone does any preparation work at church.  The AV person of the week gets the Bulletin by email and updates the weekly service Presentation. 

    The youth have everything on their smartphones -  the older members ask 'why are the "kids" always on their phones during service?'  

    Working with a small church plant now (about 20 adult members to start and many more kids). This intro pricing seems like a steal. initially, my goal was to create a website. Looked at three church website providers, ranging from $30-$50/month. One of them offered integration with a ChMS solution—but only one(!) specific ChMS provider for integration. We’re seriously considering Faithlife Equip at this price point. i Already started playing around with the free website builder. First impression: not bad; nice simple interface and easy to learn; training videos and articles are easy to follow and helpful; not as robust as other church website providers, but certainly covers the necessities.

    The content offering is pretty incredible (scaled down version of Logos [relative to what any serious logos user owns], access to all Mobile Ed videos(!), etc.), Proclaim, and online giving is great. The People/member management functionality is still in beta, but seems like something we will definitely utilize to some degree (though definitely not fully). The Faithlife Church Group aspect is also interesting to me. At our current church (from which we are planting), member outreach with news, events, prayer requests, etc. is all done by a secretary by email, which complicates managing, organizing, and following up on all that data. So I see Equip not only potentially reducing disparate data silos, but also potentially fostering simpler, more convenient contact and communication throughout the week.

    I did have an issue with a bug on video widget on the website I’m playing around with at the moment, but support has been great. tech Support was helping me on Independence Day! In fact, I had initiated a chat with a tech support gentleman who was more than happy to help answer questions outside his role as support (his name was Slav), AND i lucked out and there happened to be a product specialist who (for some reason) showed up to the office on his day off and decided to help answer some questions for me about the Equip suite of products (His name was Alex). That level of of support is unmatched by the other three providers I’ve been looking into (each of which only specializes in church websites).

    All that to say, I really think this is an enticing solution at an enticing price. im hoping to move forward with it as a church plant, and I see lots of room for growing into the array of functionality and content available, if we decide to move forward.

    in any case, kudos to Faithlife!

    P.s. Personally, Logos is my greatest concern, and I hope none of this results in any diminishment of Logos enhancements down the road!

    not as robust as other church website providers, but certainly covers the necessities

    I'd love to head what you want to see to help it catch up in robustness. More widgets, or more designs, or more control over details?

    I'd love to head what you want to see to help it catch up in robustness. More widgets, or more designs, or more control over details?

    A few things come to mind, and these are roughly in order of importance (for my preferences):

    (1) Ability to re-size content/widget spaces.

    (2) Some templates have content spaces that do not have all the widgets available (though it might be because the particular content areas are smaller in that template[?]).

    (3) More freedom with color schemes. Some templates have more freedom than others.

    (4) More freedom with font schemes, and (relatedly) ability to manually adjust Header 1, Header 2, Header 3, and normal formats.

    (5) Video backgrounds and scrolling/rotating banner.

    (6) A landing page for blogs so that they can be searched and sorted, similar to sermons.

    (7) A way to more easily sort and filter sermons (strictly for our church) once landing on Faithlife serous page.  Perhaps a filtering/faceted (and searchable facets) a la Logos library.  Perhaps this is manageable to some extent now(?).  I tried a few churches already using Faithlife Sites - I could sort by sermon series, but as soon as I ran a search, it searched the entire Faithlife sermon archive.  Maybe there's a way to filter by one specific church and then copy that link as linked text or call to action widget(?).

    (8) Fixed (or parallax) background images might be cool as you scroll down.

    (9) Apropos cool features, maybe some ability to have widget text or content slide in - something a bit more animated as people scroll down.

    Some of those are pretty trivial.  Again, it definitely covers the basics, and I really love that sermons, blogs, and events are automatically updated on the site.  We're also officially moving forward with Equip for our small church plant.  Even though we're going to be in the smallest tier to start, the feature offering is great and many of us are excited to have the content available for our members.

    Karl

    A few things come to mind, and these are roughly in order of importance (for my preferences):

    Thanks! I appreciate the feedback. Some of these things are already on the list.

    When you say 'manually adjust Header 1' etc. do you mean you want to hand-edit the style sheet (changing all H1's in this website) or that you want to override the H1 in this particular page/instance?

    (Feel free to email me at bob@faithlife.com.)

    Hi power users:

    Many interesting posts. I  see the whole bit from a different angle.

    When reading about chaplaincy, I was surprised by the Corporate type. Working there in the trenches of daily work life, a corporate chaplain is not only helping the people there (many times over burdened with all kind of problems), and that are in dire need of knowing the Savior Jesus Christ in a more real way.

    We all know that companies appropriate the surplus of value production, very little goes into corporate social responsibility that makes a real change.

    The way I see it, It would only be great if FL could get involved closer with the development of excellent corporate Chaplains, and see if through networking, the same could be hired to provide a very needed service in modern corporate America.

    Persons in need of good counseling and help with life planning and management could be reached, and introduced to Logos and some of the "for real life" resources and tools that can be used to get right with God, and start enjoying the blessings that He may bestow as He wishes.

    There are persons struggling with addiction, compulsions, illness, aging relatives, misbehaving children, debt, exploration, past abuse, in work abuse and harassment, etc. 

    A well trained chaplain can really make a difference in such situations.

    Once the value of such initiatives is realized by corporate America, then partnership can be formed, where they can give back to society by backing FL, to continue developing tools, resources, personnel  as they will allow trained Chaplains to:

    Be of help in making moral business decisions.

    Help in the labor relations where godly due process systems can be a boost to moral in the workforce, and a blessing from God's point of view.

    Truly help persons find proper and effective help from God to learn how to navigate through the difficult times in life when tough situations arise.

    Help the Glory of God fill the Earth, as predicted in the Bible.

    Allow persons to learn more about Christian responsibility and stewardship, and to appropriate of the wisdom God has revealed in the Bible.

    Eventually, multiply the chaplaincy corps, as persons that receive help, decide to be a tool of help eventually in gratefulness to God.

    Just a very different angle for further research, reflection and constructive comment as needed.

    Corporate America, business profit, corporate social responsibility, and the like, are not inherently bad. No body more appropriate than Christians to help redeem the bad parts of it, and help expand the Kingdom, and help the sheep get back to the flock.

    Peace and grace.

    When reading about chaplaincy, I was surprised by the Corporate type.

    An organization already exists for this - https://mchapusa.com/ Personally, I would prefer that Faithlife NOT devote resources to this niche. I prefer that Faithlife keep getting better at what Faithlife is already doing. 

    Making Disciples! Logos Ecosystem = LogosMax on Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Win11), Android app on tablet, FSB on iPhone & iPad mini, Proclaim (Proclaim Remote on Fire Tablet).

    Hi David Thomas:

    Thanks for the link. 

    You say that you would like FL to not get into marketplace chaplaincy. Even though there is an organization for that, I do not see them using L8 platform (I may be wrong).

    In order for FL to continue innovating, they need extra income. Where are you going to get it? from Academicians? from Pastors of small churches?

    From casual users?

    Corporations have all kinds of problems, and they need help that brings results, they can generously support initiatives that really help them solve many of the problems they are facing.

    I see potential in a niche where you can help the working person, and allow companies to spend their social responsibility money in a better way.

    But maybe you know something that we do not know, and could illuminate us more on the details.

    Supervisors keep saying that we spend most of our time at work, (common sheep talking here), so what would be wrong to get God to redeem the bad parts of secular work, via a wonderful platform like FL?

    Input related to any of the above is highly appreciated.

    But maybe you know something that we do not know, and could illuminate us more on the details.

    Only my personal experience as a law enforcement chaplain in 2 departments and an awareness of others who are speaking to the FWE (Faith Work & Economics) space. But not pertinent to Bob's request in his original post on this thread.

    Making Disciples! Logos Ecosystem = LogosMax on Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Win11), Android app on tablet, FSB on iPhone & iPad mini, Proclaim (Proclaim Remote on Fire Tablet).

    Bob,

    I tried to give a quick read-through of the other responses, so my response might not be too redundant.  I would affirm what many people have said.  Your customers appreciate the ability of giving you direct input.  However, I suspect that there are several who feel like I do, that the direction you are taking the company just happens to be different than what would best work for me, so my input may not be very helpful. However, you asked...

    As a pastor, I would agree with those who say that most smaller churches won't want to wade into the water to try your church software, because it actually requires the church to jump in.  You have replied to these responses about cost.  However, when you say, "A lot of the functionality is 'free to test', but a small church can live in that zone just fine," I think you are missing some pieces of why many churches won't engage.  From you perspective, much of the software is "free to test," and your intention will be to keep the cost down fore very small churches.  However, that misses a couple of major issues for the average pastor/church.  Maybe first and foremost, many of the pastors on this forum appreciate figuring out and using more complex software.  However, most pastors I know are far too busy and disinterested to take the time to explore complex software. 

    In my opinion, this has become a major problem with Logos.  I've been with Logos since 1996.  Back then, you marketed your software as a way to access (mainly scholarly) books, and it was very good at that.  Up to and through Libronix, I found myself talking up Logos to Pastors and Missionaries, without even trying.  I unintentionally converted dozens of ministry people, and even whole church staffs to Logos, because any pastor who knew the basics of computer software could begin saving huge time accessing their study material, right away.  While Libronix had begun to get more complicated, by version 4, most people I knew in ministry were no longer talking about how great and easy Logos made studying, but how they didn't have the time to put in, to get significant value from the program.  A common response to this by Logos has been "more training," often at a cost (and in fact you mentioned this in this thread, talking about access to training videos).  The problem is, that adds considerably MORE time required, so that I can potentially benefit from the software.  Also, many of the features I might learn how to use, if I don't use them regularly, than I forget how to use them, and have to spend hours going back and trying to find instructions/training on how to use those features, in the middle of trying to prepare a sermon, for instance.

    I was always surprised because whenever I visited these forums, I read lots of pastors heralding all the new features of Logos, but I only knew a couple of pastors who felt that way.  Interestingly, a short time ago, there was finally a thread on this forum that addressed this, and I was surprised at how many of these same people who love the new features of Logos were expressing frustration about how complicated it is.  Also, when you moved to version 4, cost began to be a major factor.  I've had many pastors and missionaries tell me that the won't even consider Logos because of it's cost.

    Sorry if this feels like a rant.  It is not intended to be.  I'm including all this because I think this is the very reason that you might have problems convincing many churches to try your church management software.  Like Logos, it takes time to learn and gain real value from a lot of new software.  Smaller churches have little to no paid staff. You mentioned that you'd like to make Equip as easy to use as Excel, which would be great.  However, you have to remember that for non-business people, Excel is often too complex to use.  However, it is so widely used in business that a significant amount of people already know how to use it's basic function.

    So, even with "free to test" software, I have to take the time to figure out how the software works, and what value it would add to the church.  Then I need to train whichever office staff (mostly volunteer) to use it.  And, I'm doing this with "free to try" software, that might become no longer free at any point.  Or, if we grow, and use more of the capabilities, we will then have to pay an unknown future amount, and if we can't afford it, or the features aren't great for us, we will need to learn and retrain people to use some different software.  This is why churches (and pastors) particularly like buying/owning software, and specifically single purpose software.  It's not that we unsympathetic to your company's financial needs.  It's that the realities of ministry make spending large amounts of time, energy and money on software a negative, not a positive.  After all, the intended purpose of software is usually to REDUCE the amount of time, energy, and money it takes to minister.

    Last thing.  For some of us long-time Logos users, the very thing that drew us to Logos is what is now concerning to us about the direction of Logos, and also makes people like me more hesitant to try this particular package from Faithlife with our churches.  I and many others bought Logos, and spend considerable money adding books in electronic form, because we were sold the idea that, "we are not selling software, we are selling books in an easier to access manor, and it won't cost you more to use them."  That's not exact wording, but that was the idea.  As Logos set it's sights on more advanced software capabilities, it required more staff, more costs on your end.  Like other software companies, there became a need for greater, and perhaps more perpetual revenue streams to keep the process going.  This lead to discussions of moving to subscription based use.  It also lead to massive, very expensive Logos programs, requiring cutting edge computers to work properly.  Add to that the practical need for constant internet connection for Logos to work well, and potential loss of ownership of purchased material, and many people in ministry are getting much more skeptical of Faithlife software.  What you are offering might well be beneficial for churches.  However, the nature of Logos, and potentially this church management software system, is that very quickly, one can feel trapped - it would be to hard/costly to go another direction.  While it might be easier to have the church's website, management software and sermon prep software under "one account," that means that if costs increase, or it quits being so beneficial for the church, it has already hitched it's whole wagon to that one account.  It would be much harder to switch for even one part of that process.  You could easily get too far in to make it worth looking at other options.

    Sorry for the long post, but I appreciate your desire to get input for your customers, so I wanted to be really clear (I hope I was) 

    So, all of this to say, for most churches, mine included, the software would have to be very quickly useful (of value), and not trap us into a particular direction in the future.  It's a brutal task to try to have software be of significant value and easy to use for a small church, and of great value for a much larger church as well.  I think the suggestion for modular options makes great sense here.  If I could get the church to try a thing or two that worked well, we would be more inclined to try more things from Faithlife as our needs increased.  We would not feel like any particular purchase puts us in a potentially tough place down the road.  Over all, we would much prefer to support a company that provides many specifically church based resources, with our business.  I very much appreciate that Faithlife's intention and perspective of truly aiding churches in ministry.  I hope that you guys can make the software more useful for us than what we currently use.

    Thanks.

    Hello Bob:

    I'm just a lackey at our church, but we are a very large church of over 20,000 people who worship at something like 11 campuses.  I know that when I teach, our church prefers Pro Presenter (BIG learning curve) and has really been pushing all teaching leaders to switch from power point to pro-presenter.  Leaders and layman have access to online giving, child check in, accounts to Right Now Media, yada, yada yada.  I guess something to look in to (as I'm sure you already have considered) is how could you entice churches that already have much of what FL is offering to switch.   I know that "relationship" is big to churches and I would agree that even in our church, having someone to call who is a "personal rep" is a big deal.  Further, ease of use for layman (which I think has been an issue for FL, and certainly in Logos).  I don't think it's all about price point, unless it something completely out of budget no matter what.  Those are just come thoughts floating around in my head, for what it's worth.

    Wishing you and FL all success as you seek to honor Him in all you do.

    Cynthia Feenstra

    P.S.  Al Het:  GREAT POST!

    Cynthia

    Romans 8:28-38

    P.S.  Al Het:  GREAT POST!

    Thanks, Cynthia.  I appreciate hearing back that my comments made some sense.  By the end of writing them, I wasn't sure if I was being clear at all. 

    Bob,

    That was a long and thoughtful post. Without spending a lot of time, might I add a suggestion that might help achieve your goal?

    I have been with logos for over 10 years and it seems that 95% of the features added to the software are for Hebrew scholars (which the masses will never use) or church-wide software such as proclaim or equip (which many churches such as mine, which has 300 members, will not spend $125/mo for a subscription).

    Here the profile of 95% of the people in my church and probably every other church:

    1. Can't read Hebrew

    2. Probably isn't interested in Hebrew

    3. Probably isn't interested in the desktop full version of Logos

    4. Desires the "best" mobile bible tool on the market

    5. Happy with existing free ways to connect with church members (text messaging, facebook, a phone call)

    I think your team should spend a LOT more time improving the features of the mobile apps to make them more layperson-friendly (while retaining the advanced features). I think there have been some wonderful advances such as the "reference scanner". But there are also glaring problems that probably do you more harm than good. The biggest issue is something I've already identified ad nauseam (ex., https://community.logos.com/forums/t/176232.aspx) which is a fundamental flaw.

    I don't know if you are trying to "make more money" or just maintain the status quo, but the answer isn't through advanced Hebrew features which 95% of the church population isn't going to use. It also isn't through these social applications such as proclaim or equip because smaller churches, such as mine, will never pay the monthly fee. The way to make more money is to get your app to rank #1 on the app stores when people search "Bible" and make sure it's the best dog-gone mobile bible app on the market. If you do those two things and focus 100% on those two things for a while, your lay-users will start buying more resources and FL will make more money.

    It also isn't through these social applications such as proclaim or equip because smaller churches, such as mine, will never pay the monthly fee. 

    I fundamentally disagree. We are a church of about 50, and use and LOVE Proclaim, Faithlife Sites, and Faithlife Giving. These value added products are very useful tools for our ministry. I would think that most of their user base ARE in fact smaller churches. Just a hunch. 

    Myke Harbuck
    Lead Pastor, www.ByronCity.Church
    Adjunct Professor, Georgia Military College

    1. Can't read Hebrew

    2. Probably isn't interested in Hebrew

    3. Probably isn't interested in the desktop full version of Logos

    4. Desires the "best" mobile bible tool on the market

    Based on 1, 2, and 3, perhaps they wouldn't want the Logos version of the mobile app?

    I suspect that's why FL offers seven different mobile apps, so customers can select the best FL app for them, between, say, reading the bible, basic bible study, and more technical bible study.

    YouVersion probably holds the #1 bible app spot. I don't think the Logos mobile app could ever rank that highly, because it's designed to do much more than what most YouVersion/non-Logos users want.

    Thanks to FL for including Carta and a Hebrew audio bible in Logos 9!

     YouVersion probably holds the #1 bible app spot. 

    Some folks I know (like my mom) use YouVersion like Facebook for Christians. It's so social -- and many friends / family members use it because they connect through it. They have Logos on the home computer -- YV on the phone. So, I have to install YV to stay connected with them. One really neat thing is that Christians can recommend readings to non-Christians and get them hooked on the bible in a very simple, easy, non-threatening way.

    Don't know if Logos could ever get into this space? I mean, it's really all about the lay-level content that pastors and authors develop for YV. But it would be a total game changer if Logos could enter into that space (only have to have one bible app on devices) -- I suspect it would be complex to filter the content for different levels (e.g. lay, pastors, scholars). I may not be searching hard enough, but I have a very challenging time finding valuable content on YV (even the big name authors seem to produce things more on the simpler end).


    Here the profile of 95% of the people in my church and probably every other church:

    1. Can't read Hebrew

    2. Probably isn't interested in Hebrew

    Don't doubt any of this. (If anything the % is way too low.)

    ...but therein lies the rub. Those who aren't interested in Hebrew can't be Hebrew, and by definition only Hebrews are saved. If the scoffers spent less time scoffing and more time determining why that's true (i.e. prophetically true), then perhaps they wouldn't be so intransigently disinterested. But then again, probably not...I think most folks would rather just die. 

    ASUS  ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti

    "The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not."  Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.

    To be honest this software is so expensive, cumbersome, troublesome, and difficult to use that I keep it for one reason....because I have had it.  I use other less expensive, easier to use, and closer to my theological training for exegesis in my counseling ministry.  Nor would I recommend this mess to another christian, a local church congregation, or a client to use in their own personal devotions.  Want me to spend more...than clean this interface up...lower its cost...add an option to get rid of predigested data basis...make the library easier to use (only the Divine knows how I am suppose to manage the pathetic library I have)....and perhaps be less "premiere" in advertising-yes I know I need just one more bundle to be able to fully use the product.  In the end my gut tells me, although I have no proof, that my license will one day be in the hands of a conglomeration that will try to sell me my favorite Kindle books along with a hefty discount on their newly acquired bible engine. 

    Want me to spend more...than clean this interface up...lower its cost...add an option to get rid of predigested data basis...make the library easier to use

    I hope Rene's comments do not get dismissed. I value Logos a lot and know how to navigate it.  But if Logos wants a bigger market, there are some obvious ways to do that.  In making a simplified product, and in solving the issue of a manageable Library (no, Tagging is not the way to go for the majority of people), then more would embrace this product. Once embraced, there will be a willingness, step by step to go deeper and be interested in many of the tools that Logos has to offer.

    I think it has also been mentioned before, that Logos needs to figure a way to make this product more friendly towards seminary professors.  Why in this day and age should I purchase physical books when Logos exists?  I cannot use Mounce version 3 in a Bible College or seminary that is using version 4.  If there was a way to partner with companies to be sure the latest editions were either purchaseable or rentable for the semester...



    and in solving the issue of a manageable Library

    To be fair, there was significant progress in L8, what with the additions of facets and the ability to share collections.

    This is my personal Faithlife account. On 1 March 2022, I started working for Faithlife, and have a new 'official' user account. Posts on this account shouldn't be taken as official Faithlife views!

    This may sound more snarky than I wish...

    Professionals use professional tools. Critical commentaries require Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic & comprehension of critical methodologies. We need critical commentaries. I would not recommend them to people for personal devotions. Conversely Matthew Henry can be a useful aid for devotional reading. It is not at the advanced, professional level in 2019. Professionals use professional tools, and we need professional tools. I have not invested nearly the time in using my professional Bible Study tools that I should. (particularly given the investment!) When I need them...I need them; and learn more of what I need to know.  I want accountants to use professional accounting tools. I want lawyers to have access to professional research and trial preparation tools. I want the plumber to show up with tools that are better than what I can get at Ace Hardware. Professionals use professional tools. There are many people who are using Logos Bible Software who likely need to use a different tool. Lobbying to remove, truncate, and simplify, and eliminate the features that get in the way of the novice leaves the professional preacher, exegete, scholar without necessary tools for doing what God has called us to don.

    Lobbying to remove, truncate, and simplify, and eliminate the features that get in the way of the novice leaves the professional preacher, exegete, scholar without necessary tools for doing what God has called us to don.

    I do agree partly with you. In my mind, I think that professionals are a part of the Logos' core customer. However, I would broaden it to say that their customer is "leaders" in general in the church which would include lay-leaders (Elders/Pastors, Teachers...etc). I believe that it is around 80% of leaders in the church in the world have no formal Theological training. So, making it easier for leaders to get started and use their tools on a basic level seems beneficial in my opinion. If they could do that while improving the professional capabilities, I think it could be a win-win.

    I think the problem is, professional tools don't have to be cumbersome.  You could be able to get great results from the software without the need of advanced techniques and tricks.  This is somewhat true with Logos, as a newbie I can read books, do simple word studies, write notes and more with Logos simply.

    However, there are some things I would like to do, but just seem out of my reach, like advanced searching, and using the power tools.  Logos 8 did a great job of cleaning up the interface, and people initially complained because their learned tricks weren't working anymore.  Other things that just felt like it should of worked didn't work intuitively.  I remember having to start a reading plan before being able to add the card to the "home page". It was so frustrating I still don't use that feature.  I should have just been able to click create a new card and since I requested it, the reading plan was created.  

    It are the simple things that ensure good quality of life in a program.  I would really like a visual search bar/column that would allow you to click special parameters to search, this could help power users and beginners alike.  I would like for Logos 8 to get better and more stable before moving to other large software.

    Every end user application...which we used (lol) to call "programs", long before they were "apps" is a child of its time. I remember getting my hands on Ami Pro, a beautiful "easy" graphical word processor for windows 3.1.  7 floppies to install. 300 pages of manual. 

    Logos is old enough that it began in that age where full-service computer programs required some learning. Granted, Logos seems to have some learning curves which are a little sharper (read, hairpin) but that may be the price of power.

    Professionals use professional tools ...

    True. We just had a compressor replaced on our fridge. I watched ... he had an amazing set of tools he wielded, all scrunched up.

    But (also not snark-ified), I'd not recommend Logos for our pastor. He's the best I've seen in my no-longer-young years. Logos would destroy his success (leading folks to God). But I'd happily recommend it to a lady that helps challenged folks ... she loves hebrew. Can't afford it, though.

    It's hard to say why I see the distinctions that way.  Piper expressed frustration with his professionals. I agree. And last night, a post by Cynthia (Florida) was also good, in a similar light.

    I love the ability to personally examine the Bible, in infinite detail. But Logos for professionals?  Maybe so.

    "If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.

    Professionals use professional tools ...

    Piper expressed frustration with his professionals. I agree.

    In that sense, I do believe he is right that Pastors aren't professionals. LOL. https://www.logos.com/product/4075/brothers-we-are-not-professionals

    Hi Rene:

    I hear you. And that is why I think that  some business companies should be approached to help them in their corporate social responsibility area.

    Think of it, many companies profit from doing business with a large christian demographic, is not fair that the surplus created is ill distributed.

    Serious companies know that is correct to give back to the community. Investing in development of chaplains that help improve the lives and morality of persons makes only good business sense.

    I do not think that the Logos software is overly pricey, the workers that develop it and the creators of the platform deserve to be paid in a dignified way.

    Another concept needs to be reinforced:

    God is the owner of all gold, silver, riches, Earth, the Universe, the devil has nothing, all his minions got was by lying, cheating, stealing, killing.

    God promises that His heirs will inherit all. God gives believers creativity to do things and prosper. 

    Money, wealth and prosperity are not the problems. 

    How can someone say that is a devout son of God, and then not have enough money to get a decent package in Logos Bible software?

    See previous posts of mine to know how in developing countries, innovative socioeconomic activities have allowed groups to build Churches autonomously.

    The idea of creating a staging HQ place for learning platform to develop leaders in the future applies not only to developing countries. There are regions in the States where innovative socioeconomic initiatives can be developed, and with the help of Logos platform, the multiplying of believers and disciples can  get going in a better way.

    Peace and grace.

    Forgive this scattered brain dump; but I really wanted to share. I apologize if I ramble a little off-topic.

    I've been using Logos since 1996. When I first began using it, only one professor at my Christian College had ever heard of it. Within two years, I had gotten ~12 professors and ministerial students to adopt Logos. At seminary I continued to promote Logos, and have ever since.

    Almost all my family, friends, and clients are using Logos as per my recommendation and demonstrating for them. I've created a manual that moves slowly from basics, into more advanced, and finally into doing inductive bible study using paid versions of Logos' with advanced tools. Many of these folks are not necessarily more tech-savvy than the average person their age; and some of them are in their 70's. I created the manual so it imports nicely into Personal Books, and many of them enjoy using it that way. I've also used Logos as a powerful evangelistic and apologetic tool -- folks are blown away when they visually see the breadth, depth, and history of Christianity. Walking someone though Logos sparks so many valuable questions and interesting revelations for folks.

    I think Logos is for everyone. It's simple enough for a newbie to the software (or to Christianity) -- but complex enough for theology professors. In recent years, Logos has done a great job of putting out high quality, easy to follow, beginner training videos. The first thing I point out to a newbie is the robust help files ([F1]) and the online videos.

    I truly believe that Logos can, and does, cater to all audiences. It's akin to Microsoft Word or Excel in this way -- easy to use with a tiny bit of demonstration -- but incredibly complex and robust for heavy end-users. I think that segmented marketing, branding, and training is the key to get many more to adopt this amazing tool -- i.e. LOGOS.

    With respect to church products / services / technologies -- I've done a great deal of implementing many various systems in different non-profits and churches. I've often been disappointed with many of the vendors I've used (whether talent management, online giving, church database, etc) -- I've rarely found entities that are both Christocentric in their values, beliefs, attitudes -- AND competent in their products / services. In fact, it pains me to say, most vendors I've worked with have lacked the values and the competency (compared to secular companies). That is to say, I'd love to see Logos become the leader in every service, product, and industry that fits within your call and capacity.

    Since 1996 I've had a continued excellent relationship with Logos and have always been able to recommend you from both a competency stand point, and a customer / technical service standpoint.

    On a personal note, I do understand why Logos has so many different divisions / brands. I really wish it were just one consolidated entity (e.g. "Faithlife" -- bible software powered by Logos... sort of like buying a Dell computer that has Intel inside). For myself, it's not a big deal... but for all the people I get to adopt Logos -- it's always a bit confusing for them.

    Thanks for all you do. Logos has literally changed my life. One of my greatest joys is working with 2nd and 3rd world Christian business leaders and pastors -- and equipping them to enhance their ministries with Logos.


    I think Logos is for everyone. It's simple enough for a newbie to the software (or to Christianity) -- but complex enough for theology professors.

    I truly believe that Logos can, and does, cater to all audiences

    I agree and think that Faithlife is doing its best to make the program usable for everyone. Faithlife's mission statement is "We use technology to equip the Church to grow in the light of the Bible." 

    My understanding of this statement is to include everyone of the church, not just some, to grow their understanding.

    We’ve been building Logos Bible Software since 1991. It’s the heart of everything we do, and of accomplishing our mission:

    We use technology to equip the Church to grow in the light of the Bible.

    Logos is the premiere tool for people who are serious about Bible study. It’s heavily used by pastors, scholars, seminary students, and lay people.

    But people who are serious about Bible study -- and want to use a powerful, dedicated tool for study -- are a small percentage of most churches. We want to serve everyone in the church, and we know that many people ‘grow in the light of the Bible’ through classes, small groups, video, and free content on the web.... 

    Bob,

    I have been on both sides of the fence with you. I've been one of your biggest and harshest critics, and I have supported you. Mostly a harsh critic, however. 

    I have spent more money on my "small" library than I really can afford. 
    Unfortunately, I have felt like every penny spent has been wasted. My hostility toward the company, from 2010, until Logos 7, and really Logos 8 and it's complicated system has all but ruined my attitude toward Bible study. The exact opposite of why I purchased L3 to begin with, almost a decade ago. 

    Sadly, to actually learn how to use it, I have to gain a desire to use it. Something that despite my on again off again spurts of hope, dwindle as I realize the task of actually using this software as I used former easier software titles. 
    On the other hand, thanks to Logos Now, Logos Connect, what ever name the subscription is going by this week, I sometimes get an inkling of excitement to finish my studies, particularly Greek and Hebrew (I need two years of both to finally graduate) only to get bogged down in despair. 

    One thing I have come to think i have realize is, contrary to my initial reaction to you, personally, I do now believe you do desire to do the right thing with Logos. I see many things that I cannot explain. Sales that "glitch" far too frequently; as one example. But, I see you attempt to fix that as well. I cannot ask more than that from anyone. And, pray that these really are glitches. 

    So, another thing that has changed my mind about your integrity and purpose, is that, as you say in this post, You want to be transparent in how Logos/Faithlife is run. That is an incredible thing to do. It puts you in a very vulnerable place. Esp. when you get bombarded by critics, like myself, who seem to question your every move, and it's motivation. I remind myself of the Democrats who seek to "find something ANYTHING on Trump" (Oh boy. I did go there. Oops). Or Republicans who did the same on Clinton and Obama (yep, went there too). 

    Since you opened this discussion, and perhaps it's to sell another product; I would like to offer my one (maybe few) suggestion(s). 
    I am floored by the two major trainers and how much they make by peddling their "Logos Training:" I will applaud Logos for the many training videos offered for free, over the past couple years. Unfortunately for me, however, I almost find it a little too late. But, nevertheless, THANK YOU for the helps. 
    Logos 8 is a HUGE step in the right direction: Faster and easier to use than previous editions. I can actually find passages faster on Logos than Googling them (yeah; for 7-8 years, I Googled the passages, as opposed to using this expensive Bible software, because it was faster and easier! 
    But, I pray Google 9 and forward go faster and is easier to use than even 8. 

    A second area that is extremely frustrating to me is the constant updates. I hate mentioning this, because, without fail, despite this same disclaimer, someone will always mention how we can change the update settings. That is beside the point. And, unfortunately, in today's world, updates are necessary on a per second basis. Security flaws as well as software improvements/corrections. I get it. But, at the same time, I turn on my computer, and Windows has to update. Anti-virus software has to update. Hardware has to update. Software has to update. And Logos has to update. I have begun to think that we spend 90% of our time updating everything so we can use our computers, except we need to update again. 

    Sadly, I have no answers. Just wishes. I wish I could turn on my computer and open my Bible and in 20-30 seconds have my Bible opened, and it is so easy to use, I dont feel like I am computer illiterate to read my Bible. Perhaps a continuing improvement on speed and ease of use will help. Sadly there's not much that can be done to regain my desire (that i am aware of) to get back to the Bible Study I once loved. That will take God to move me back. 

    Thank you for being open to us. 
    Tim
    Aka Batman



     Sadly there's not much that can be done to regain my desire (that i am aware of) to get back to the Bible Study I once loved. That will take God to move me back.

    I need Jesus every day. Praying that he renews your heart to love him.

    Taste and see that the Lord is good; blessed is the one who takes refuge in him.” (Psalm 34:8, NIV)

    Like newborn babies, crave pure spiritual milk, so that by it you may grow up in your salvation, now that you have tasted that the Lord is good.” (1 Peter 2:2–3, NIV)

     Sadly there's not much that can be done to regain my desire (that i am aware of) to get back to the Bible Study I once loved. That will take God to move me back.

    I need Jesus every day. Praying that he renews your heart to love him.

    Taste and see that the Lord is good; blessed is the one who takes refuge in him.” (Psalm 34:8, NIV)

    Like newborn babies, crave pure spiritual milk, so that by it you may grow up in your salvation, now that you have tasted that the Lord is good.” (1 Peter 2:2–3, NIV)

    Actually, God has already given you the knowledge to realize you can’t be in your current state.  It’s your choice to go back to your Father just like it was the prodigal son’s choice to come to his senses.

    You cannot expect God to be behind you begging you to come back or to convince you to come back.  To expect a miracle or God to come and fetch you is to believe the devil’s lies.

    Praying and hoping you repent and turn back to God!

    DAL

    Guys, for goodness sakes. Casting 'Bible Study' as theological is the first mistake. Timothy, where art thou? And treating Logos as 'Bible Study' is the second. Sermon prep, yes. Research, yes. Batman is where he needs to be.

    "If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.

    DAL, Sorry, but, your response is about as confused a response as I have seen, in a long while. 

    First, you are off base on what God does: "I have chosen you", "No man comes to the Father unless I draw them to him". Yes, God wants us to diligently seek him, and rewards those who do. But, even that is the gift of God. So, no, you are completely off base Scripturally  in saying "To expect a miracle or God to come and fetch you is to believe the devil’s lies." 
    Second, I stated that I have lost my desire to study the Bible as I once did, because this software has been a sore spot to me for so long. It was everything I expected, but, nothing of what I had hoped. I had hoped it would be as simple to use as the previous software I had used, except thanks to MS upgrading to XP, none of my old software worked. I was told this was awesome software, would be fabulous for research. I just didn't expect to have to go to school to learn how to use it, or, for it to have been slower than opening the hard copy Bible to find a passage. Or to google a passage. 
    As a side note, I generally use commentaries to ensure I am following inline Biblical interpretation, as opposed to "private interpretation", although I do my own work. I do have a working knowledge of how the Hebrew language works, while my actual language skills are not yet complete. 
    But, Bible Study and whatever you are talking about are two different things. 
    And, I will accept the prayers from any who profess to be Christians, for my spiritual well being; and, I do appreciate that. 

     Sadly there's not much that can be done to regain my desire (that i am aware of) to get back to the Bible Study I once loved. That will take God to move me back.

    Actually, God has already given you the knowledge to realize you can’t be in your current state.  It’s your choice to go back to your Father just like it was the prodigal son’s choice to come to his senses.

    You cannot expect God to be behind you begging you to come back or to convince you to come back.  To expect a miracle or God to come and fetch you is to believe the devil’s lies.

    Praying and hoping you repent and turn back to God!

    DAL

    Andrew:
    I do appreciate the prayers. However, please do not misinterpret "frustration" over things as being equal to not loving God. 
    The desire or lack thereof is due to the over complicated system, which is due to it's complex nature. For about 8 years I had an over-priced Logos system that did me no good at all. The simplest of tasks (looking up a verse by keyword or location) was far easier and quicker to do in a hard copy Bible or a google search. The load times alone was ridiculous. Fortunately, this has been improved upon with Logos 8. What used to take 3-5 minutes to load now take 30-60 seconds. Then there was the constant updates, rendering the software completely useless. (Yes, I know you can turn off updates, but, that is NOT an answer, because the updates are STILL there to be updated).
    It's now just a matter of getting the desire to use this software that has cost me thousands of dollars over the past 9-10 years. Remember each jump is about $400, plus any additionals. I started at 3, was told there were no plans for L4, and within several months, there it was. Fortunately, Logos has since allowed for major discounts for jumping to the next version, that I do not recall before L7, if you had just purchased the previous. 

    So, again, people who have frustrations and even anger issues with even "Christian" organizations have good reason to. But, does not mean they do not love God. 

     Sadly there's not much that can be done to regain my desire (that i am aware of) to get back to the Bible Study I once loved. That will take God to move me back.

    I need Jesus every day. Praying that he renews your heart to love him.

    Taste and see that the Lord is good; blessed is the one who takes refuge in him.” (Psalm 34:8, NIV)

    Like newborn babies, crave pure spiritual milk, so that by it you may grow up in your salvation, now that you have tasted that the Lord is good.” (1 Peter 2:2–3, NIV)

    Andrew:
    I do appreciate the prayers. However, please do not misinterpret "frustration" over things as being equal to not loving God.

    Ah, I am glad for that! I was misunderstanding what you were saying then. I'm glad that your desire for God and knowing him through his word doesn't hinge on being happy with your Logos purchase. :)

    This might not be you, but one thing I've found in me is that often when I find myself getting upset or disappointment in something, it can often be because I have made myself or an object an idol of my affections. That can be a good heart/motivation check. But, only you and the Lord know your own heart.

    On a practical level, I'm sure we also agree together that we want Logos to improve.

    This is the best Bible study tool I have ever used, hands down! I would be very lost if something were to happen and we did not have this tool any longer. 

    I have been using Logos for several years. Searching is very, very challenging. If any improvement I would suggest something be doe to make searching much easier.

    Some of the search stings that I have seen  in this forum leave me amazed. I do not think I could ever come up with what I have seen.

    I looked at Equip and I could see the value IF I didn't already have the tools and if my church needed them. There might be an interesting market in church plants. We already have website, giving, and for less money, and they work. Like everyone says, changing is hard.

    A deal breaker in Equip is the Bible versions- we use a different one, and there would be no way to put something out there with a version different than what we use. 

    I would think the most effective sales strategy is to make its software the standard for every Bible college and seminary (I presume they already believe this)

    In terms of Logos cost to an individual, I need to break it down into two/three  components: the software itself, the hardware "add" (see below), and the books. Pastors will buy books anyway- then to say it's costly, one has to compare the cost of "real" books and Logos books. One clear added cost is the cost of Logos itself, and also added cost of having Logos capable hardware vs what one would use if one didn't use Logos. 

    To those who wrote that people are moving away from technology, that may be true for some but the numbers say otherwise, and for some time, the fastest adopters are seniors. They've learned it keeps them in touch with their children/grandchildren/etc. And we've seen that when people "get" that they need tech, like with Zoom-like technology, they learn really fast. 

    Windows 11

    We’ve been building Logos Bible Software since 1991. It’s the heart of everything we do, and of accomplishing our mission:

    We use technology to equip the Church to grow in the light of the Bible.

    Logos is the premiere tool for people who are serious about Bible study. It’s heavily used by pastors, scholars, seminary students, and lay people.

    But people who are serious about Bible study -- and want to use a powerful, dedicated tool for study -- are a small percentage of most churches. We want to serve everyone in the church, and we know that many people ‘grow in the light of the Bible’ through classes, small groups, video, and free content on the web.

    Faithlife Equip is our platform for helping everyone in every church grow in the light of the Bible. We believe an integrated platform (one account!) is of great value to the church, and that the more we integrate the daily ‘mechanics and logistics’ of the church (member management, communications, calendar, giving, website, etc.) with biblical content (sermons, curriculum, Bible study, videos, etc.) the more likely it is that we can engage and serve the whole church.

    My church, Trinity Bible Church, Phoenix, AZ, uses material from 9Marks and The Gospel Coalition.  Both of these organizations are very supportive of expository preaching.  Our belief is that preaching directly out of the Bible text week after week will benefit our congregation by emphasizing the importance we should be putting on the Word of God.  These sermons also serve to train the congregants in the basics of hermeneutics.  Historical and cultural context is dealt with, as well as an appreciation for the effort that goes into exegesis.  It is an opportunity for the preacher to provide training by example.

    I suggest that if Logos were to pick up the mantle of championing expository preaching, you would be helping pastors to awaken their congregations to the necessity of opening their Bibles during the week.  This could help to increase the percentage of those interested in serious Bible study.

    You have very good book resources available on this topic.  However, the mobile training is a bit on the expensive side and is somewhat limited.  The least expensive offer, which does mention expository preaching, is over nine hundred dollars.

    Going to make a suggestion that I don't expect will be picked up and developed, but it's worth a shot. As I've made clear many times for the last decade or so, I still use L3 as my primary Logos tool, but I still use more recent L# versions are needed, which are sufficiently different such that they can run side-by-side. I actually find this very useful for many reasons, so my suggestion to FL is that they create a relatively (not completely) stripped-down version of the L# software that allows newbie users to use that (effectively separate) program for simple daily use while having the bulkier and more adept and powerful version waiting in the background to provide help when basic isn't enough. That way, folks can get plenty of daily use out of the simpler program, while being able to dip their toes into the meatier issues as circumstances require.

    Here's my pitch for the basic version: make it more like L3. There are so many searches and whatnot that can be accomplished on L3 in 0-2 clicks and 1-5 seconds that take 4 or more clicks and 10-30 seconds--or longer--in later versions. I am definitely making this pitch in the hopes that I can comfortably lay L3 to rest by transitioning to a supported (non-deprecated) product while being able to keep and utilize the numerous benefits and features that were inexplicably abandoned when moving to L4 and beyond. I won't get into specifics here, although I am happy to do so if asked. Mainly, what I want to do is emphasize that a simplified version of the software would eradicate a major perceived downside to the current software, and provide a camel's nose that could eventually turn customers of "the basics" in eventual power users. As is currently possible with L3 and L-current, both programs should be able to run side-by-side. The idea is that a person's library would be accessible in both versions, but the procedures for using the software would be far more simplified as a result of having fewer options for use.

    In a nutshell, being all things to all people is not likely to come to pass. Providing a slimmer, quicker version of the software could resolve many issues and concerns and open up Logos to a much wider client base.

    ASUS  ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti

    "The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not."  Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.

    Going to make a suggestion that I don't expect will be picked up and developed, but it's worth a shot. As I've made clear many times for the last decade or so, I still use L3 as my primary Logos tool, but I still use more recent L# versions are needed, which are sufficiently different such that they can run side-by-side. I actually find this very useful for many reasons, so my suggestion to FL is that they create a relatively (not completely) stripped-down version of the L# software that allows newbie users to use that (effectively separate) program for simple daily use while having the bulkier and more adept and powerful version waiting in the background to provide help when basic isn't enough. That way, folks can get plenty of daily use out of the simpler program, while being able to dip their toes into the meatier issues as circumstances require.

    Here's my pitch for the basic version: make it more like L3. There are so many searches and whatnot that can be accomplished on L3 in 0-2 clicks and 1-5 seconds that take 4 or more clicks and 10-30 seconds--or longer--in later versions. I am definitely making this pitch in the hopes that I can comfortably lay L3 to rest by transitioning to a supported (non-deprecated) product while being able to keep and utilize the numerous benefits and features that were inexplicably abandoned when moving to L4 and beyond. I won't get into specifics here, although I am happy to do so if asked. Mainly, what I want to do is emphasize that a simplified version of the software would eradicate a major perceived downside to the current software, and provide a camel's nose that could eventually turn customers of "the basics" in eventual power users. As is currently possible with L3 and L-current, both programs should be able to run side-by-side. The idea is that a person's library would be accessible in both versions, but the procedures for using the software would be far more simplified as a result of having fewer options for use.

    In a nutshell, being all things to all people is not likely to come to pass. Providing a slimmer, quicker version of the software could resolve many issues and concerns and open up Logos to a much wider client base.

    Is the web app a possible solution to this need, or is offline support essential?

    Hi Bob,

    Somewhat late to this, but here goes:

    • Make it modular with separate prices.  We cannot migrate wholesale (or afford the whole package if I am paying for other services) but I would love to use the educational part of this and maybe in time other parts.
    • Allow integrations into other platforms as you have done with Planning Center and Proclaim.  It helps enormously.

    I've been using Logos since v1.2 and not been disappointed so far!  Keep going brother.

    Make it modular with separate prices. 

    I would second that. I am a member of a small (~50) lay-run church. We do not need nor could we afford any subscription like what you're offering, even for small churches. The only thing we might want, and would want to purchase once and be done with it, would be a simple church directory software. Our volunteer who currently does it using a Word document could enter the names and contact info and photos and generate a nicely laid-out printed directory which she would update twice a year. We wouldn't want the member info stored in the cloud (Canada has strict privacy laws that prevent such stuff from being stored in servers in the US). That would be all we'd want. And we might pay $100 to $150 for it. I'm guessing it wouldn't be cost effective for you to produce such a module for small churches.