Is it possible to make the LES 2nd Edition my preferred resource for Enoch? I want the links to Enoch in my library to take me to the LES 2nd Edition.
You prioritize it above any of your Pseudepigraha, then Advance Prioritize, selecting type Pseudepigrapha.
But remember, it's missing the Parables (Ethiopian) and almost all chapters thereafter (Vaticanus).
You prioritize it above any of your Pseudepigraha, then Advance Prioritize, selecting type Pseudepigrapha. But remember, it's missing the Parables (Ethiopian) and almost all chapters thereafter (Vaticanus).
Thank you.
You prioritize it above any of your Pseudepigraha, then Advance Prioritize, selecting type Pseudepigrapha. But remember, it's missing the Parables (Ethiopian) and almost all chapters thereafter (Vaticanus). Thank you.
In practice (for LES2), you need to select type Bible (LXX-S) and prioritize it above any other LXX bible.
You also need to set the range (second box) to Enoch.
Yours doesn't work for me. Uniformly pulls up OTP (LES top priority, referenced Enoch verse indeed in LES).
I assume LES2 different? Haven't downloaded.
When I set LES to OTP and 1 Enoch, Enoch references prefer LXX-Swete (with OTP) OR prefer LES2 (with LXX-S), despite being prioritized lower than LES.
When I set LES to LXX-S and Enoch, Enoch references prefer LES with the same order of resources.
LES2 doesn't have OTP.
When I set LES2 to LXX-S and Enoch, Enoch references prefer LES2 when prioritized higher than LES and LXX-Swete.
My reference to OTP was if I saw an Enoch reference in a monograph on Enoch, what resource would it quote in a popup. Using your 1st procedure, I get OTP (undesired). With mine, I get LES (desired). If I remove the LES priority, I go back to OTP as the quoted reference (I assume a default absent user priority).
Looking at your results above, I'm not sure what is happening (don't have your expertise). I'm still on L7. They were doing something extra for LES2?
Anyway.
My reference to OTP was if I saw an Enoch reference in a monograph on Enoch, what resource would it quote in a popup. Using your 1st procedure, I get OTP (undesired).
I was also looking for the resource quoted in a popup, and get the same result when I include the OTP resource in my prioritization (above the LXX Swete resource with OTP datatype).
With mine, I get LES (desired). If I remove the LES priority, I go back to OTP
I also get LES without using advanced prioritization or when specifying the LXX-S datatype. For some reason, the OTP datatype does not work in Advanced Prioritization of LES.
Denise, Dave, aren't you describing a problem that occurs in all resources where there is an old datatype based on some anthology and a new datatype based on standards and common sense? I don't recall running into any where the two datatypes mapped to each other ... but I wouldn't necessarily have noticed.
Thank you, Dave.
MJ, I can keep my serger threads nicely balanced, even on a curve. And Libby can see datatypes (granted, she takes her time listing them all out). But Logos is a world belonging to you, Dave, and Mark(s)! Did I leave anyone out? Maybe KSFJ. In theory, they should either work transparently, or be mappable to the user (Libby insisted on the latter).
Denise, Dave, aren't you describing a problem that occurs in all resources where there is an old datatype based on some anthology and a new datatype based on standards and common sense? I don't recall running into any where the two datatypes mapped to each other ..
I don't know what you mean by "old datatype". The OTP datatype overlaps with LXX-S up to Ch 32, when OTP goes on to Ch 108. My tests were conducted on references to Enoch 8 and 10.
I don't know what you mean by "old datatype".
I mean that there are sometimes two datatypes for the same text - one from when Logos clumped pseudepigrapha into an amorphorous clump by translator and one representing the current approach by text.
