New Hebrew Semantic Domain Dictionary
I know there is the DBL Hebrew (Swanson 1997) out there but it is not ordered by semantic domain like Louw-Nida.
Comments
-
Are you suggesting that Faithlife make an entirely new semantic domain dictionary or that SDBH (still unfinished) should be made available in Logos?
NIDOTTE contains an index of semantic fields. Another resource that is already available in Logos is Biblical Hebrew Vocabulary By Conceptual Categories: A Student’s Guide To Nouns In The Old Testament (though this is obviously not a dictionary).
0 -
Glass half full. Each entry in DBL Hebrew does have the Louw-Nida number, so with some extra work you could group them into domains.
0 -
Adding to Lee, in Logos "there's always a way", no matter how ineligent (sp?).
In this case, a CitedBy can link the LN sort, to a DBL entry (or more accurately, entries ... DBL tends to sprinkle here and there).
In the example below, I put an LN TOC on the left, with a CitedBy linked (in the example, it's checking any of my hebrew lexicons, especially DBL).
In this case, with a selected LN code, DBL cites the code in several entries ... DBL on the right expands any selected.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
Thank to Denise for sorting that out in more ways than one!
0 -
Echoing Lee, many thanks, Denise!
0 -
Scott,
There's a big sale going on right now. DBL Hebrew and many other resources are being discounted.
0 -
Denise said:
In the example below, I put an LN TOC on the left, with a CitedBy linked (in the example, it's checking any of my hebrew lexicons, especially DBL).
In this case, with a selected LN code, DBL cites the code in several entries ... DBL on the right expands any selected.
Good one!
0 -
HJ. van der Wal said:
NIDOTTE contains an index of semantic fields.
Regrettably, there are no reference numbers assigned to semantic fields in NIDOTTE and so one cannot use them as arguments to combine with others in searches as one can with LN.
0 -
Cross-referencing this thread.
0
