Verbum Tip 4k: Prerequisite for Senses: text, data type, lemma, sense; PBB files
Docx files for personal book: Verbum 9 part 1; How to use the Verbum Lectionary and Missal
Please be generous with your additional details, corrections, suggestions, and other feedback. This is being built in a .docx file for a PBB which will be shared periodically.
Previous post: Verbum Tip 4j Next post: Verbum Tip 4l
Prerequisite for Senses: text, data type, lemma, sense
Search term |
Example: Abraham |
Example: Ur (City) |
Example: tent |
Comments |
Text |
|
Ur |
tent |
|
Data type |
|
|||
Lemma |
|
|
||
Sense |
n/a |
n/a |
|
Note: the lemma list is not exhaustive. Lemma format falls into 3 categories:
- Logos morphology/dictionary/lexicon lemmas used by default because they are broadly used. Logos morphology is available for Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, Latin
- Lemma divisions associated with a specific dictionary are especially popular with Strong’s fans. Certain lexicons other than Strongs also can accessed in a similar method.
- Lemma divisions associated with specific morphological coding are sometimes useful – Andersen-Forbes being one of the first and, therefore, well known.
Available morphological coding for morphology search.
Morphology |
Aramaic |
Greek |
Hebrew |
Latin |
Syriac |
“Transliterated” |
Andersen-Forbes |
Yes |
|
Yes |
|
|
|
Biblia Hebraica transcripta (BHt) |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
Comprehensive Aramaic Lexicon (CAL) |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
Friberg |
|
Yes |
|
|
|
|
GRAMCORD™ |
|
Yes |
|
|
|
|
Leiden Peshitta Institute |
|
|
|
|
Yes |
|
Logos |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
Logos Aramaic Inscriptions |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
Logos Semitic Inscriptions |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
|
Sedra 3 |
|
|
|
|
Yes |
|
Stuttgart Electronic Study Bible (SESB) |
Yes |
|
Yes |
|
|
|
Swanson |
|
Yes |
|
|
|
|
Werkgroep Informatica (WIVU) |
Yes |
|
Yes |
|
|
|
Westminster |
Yes |
|
Yes |
|
|
|
Some resources with useful lemma-related data types in addition to the standard headwords.
Language |
Resource |
Form |
Aramaic Hebrew |
Harris, R. Laird, Gleason L. Archer Jr., and Bruce K. Waltke, eds. 1999. Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament. |
|
Greek |
Louw, Johannes P., and Eugene Albert Nida. 1996. Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament: based on semantic domains. |
|
Greek |
Moulton, James Hope, and George Milligan. 1930. The vocabulary of the Greek Testament. |
|
Greek |
Strong, James. 1996. The New Strong’s Dictionary of Hebrew and Greek Words. |
|
Greek |
Strong, James. 2009. A Concise Dictionary of the Words in the Greek Testament and The Hebrew Bible. |
|
Aramaic |
Swanson, James. 1997. Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains: Aramaic (Old Testament). |
|
Greek |
Swanson, James. 1997. Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains: Greek (New Testament). |
|
Hebrew |
Swanson, James. 1997. Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains : Hebrew (Old Testament). |
|
Aramaic |
Thomas, Robert L. 1998. New American Standard Hebrew-Aramaic and Greek dictionaries : updated edition. |
|
Hebrew |
Vine, W. E., Merrill F. Unger, and William White Jr. 1996. Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words. |
|
One can use Verbum very effectively, ignoring all but the Louw-Nida datatype. For all others, the use of headwords will serve your purposes. However, because a number of resources refer to these datatype, one needs to be aware of what they refer to.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
Comments
-
MJ. Smith said:
Please be generous with your additional details, corrections, suggestions
Text
- Abraham
- Abram, Abraham
- “John Mark”
Ur
tent
- Searches actual surface text of any text resource
- Returns referents references to name---> belongs to <Person> <Place> <Thing>
- Generally uses parsing algorithm not tagging (Match all word forms) - what uses parsing?
- Can disambiguate Proper noun vs. common noun (Match case)
- Can specify language and marks sensitivity (Match marks) --> see Matching Commands.
MJ. Smith said:Data type
- <Person Abraham>
- person:Abraham
- <Place Ur (city)>
- Place:Ur (city)
- <Thing tent>
- thing:tent
- Searches tags in tagged resources ---> these examples use datasets i.e. Biblical People, Bib. Places, Bib. Things, Bib. Referents
- Returns references to person ---> referents to Person, Place, Thing?
- Is disambiguated by definition ---> meaning <Place Ur (city)> can't be mistaken for <Place Ur (region)>?
Should this be in the Comments column? Separate Clause syntax or label it as Clause syntax.
MJ. Smith said:Lemma
- lemma:אַבְרָם
- <Lemma = lbs/he/אַבְרָם>
- <DBLHebrew = DBLH 92>
- <HebrewGK = HGK92>
- <HebrewStrongs = H87>
- <GreekStrongs = G5624>
- lemma:אוּר:3
- <Lemma ~ lbs/he/אוּר:3>
- <DBLHebrew = DBLH 243>
- <HebrewGK = HGK243>
- <HebrewStrongs = H218>
- <TWOT = TWOT No. 52e>
- lemma:אֹ֫הֶל:1
- <Lemma ~ lbs/he/אֹ֫הֶל:1>
- lemma:אהל:3 (in AFAT)
- <Lemma ~ af/he/אהל:3>
- <Lemma ~ lls/he/אֹהֶל:1> (in BHW)
- <Lemma ~ lpi/syr/ܡܫܟܢܐ>
- <Lemma ~ lbs/la/tabernāculum>
- Searches tags in compatible morphology-tagged resources ---> the lemma is a tag? OR the resource is tagged with lemmas?[:)]
- Returns references to any form of the lemma
- Lemmas disambiguated only in dictionary sense (indicated by a number) ---> what number? Lemmas are Headwords as in any dictionary/lexicon. Not every lexicon has multiple indexes, and some 'numbers' are not unique to the lemma e.g. TWOT 54 in DBL Hebrew relates two lemmas.
- Does not need parsing algorithm ---> how does this help i.e. it has to be parsed
Dave
===Windows 11 & Android 13
0 -
Thank you Dave ... this is feedback I needed ... I'll go back and revise after I've sorted out the misbehavior of superset ...
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0