Learning Biblical Hebrew: Reading for Comprehension (Kutz and Josberger) - wretchedly small Hebrew f

I'm not sure what the issue is with page 37 in the grammar that you noted. The screenshot of the print is what the source files I provided looked like.

I can tell you that the problems with the workbook arise from the fact that it was designed for print and the interlinear visual alignment of the print workbook was not possible to replicate at the time when we were producing the workbook. For the exercises in Part 1, most were supposed to be in a static PDF-like format to preserve their worksheet characteristics. On exercises where that wasn't deemed necessary, the workaround was to use embedded images whenever the original layout needed to be represented. With the page you've noted from Exercise 3C, that second block of Hebrew should probably have been treated as an image like the block at the top of the exercise or the whole page should have been presented as a PDF. Instead, it was handled like the interlinear reader portions. Originally, the translation for each word was placed in a line immediately below the Hebrew word, so the translation was "above" that paragraph of text. Our workaround for the graded reader sections was to have the interlinear glosses appear on hover and be treated like footnotes. I am still interested in finding ways to improve the workbook in Logos. For issues like you've noted for the grammar, you could report future readability issues with the "report typo" feature. Or post about them on the forum, where Kyle and I may or may not see it.

SineNomine said:

Unfortunately, Report Typo is, to us customers, a black box;

I was only offering it as an option for non-urgent corrections. I don't know how Kyle handles their typo reports, but for Lexham resources, we request the report before we plan to update a resource. Sometimes we fix typos before a new print run. I'm guessing Kyle has a similar process: They look at the typo report when a resource comes up for its turn for updates.

It's true that making noise on the forums is the way to get more focused attention for issues that impact your use of the resource. I wasn't subtly pushing anyone away from that option. It's not a Faithlife preference vs. user preference issue for me. I don't mind addressing issues and receiving feedback through the forums, but in this case, it was pure chance that I happened to see this forum thread yesterday.

PetahChristian said:

It was helpful to learn that your team handles digital conversion issues for Lexham resources, thanks. I assumed that Kyle handled everything, not just FL.

Would these (or Attn Doug) threads be easier for you to spot in the Lexham Press forum?

To be clear, Lexham handles digital production in coordination with Kyle's team. So we might draw attention to needed corrections, but the actual implementation still requires Kyle's team. If you have specific issues about Lexham resources, it is more likely someone from Lexham Press will notice them in the Lexham Press forum, but if it has to do with digital production problems, Kyle's input will also be needed. Plus I'm not the point person for everything published by Lexham.