Will the NASB 2020 come with tagging?

To further explain, I would like to see it have the reverse interlinear built-in. Considering how long it has taken to develop, certainly it must. If it doesn’t, that’s kind of a big fail! So does anyone know? Thank you!

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

JT (alabama24)

It most certainly won’t “come with it.” I anticipate that they will release an RI at some point… but even if it comes at launch, there would be a cost. I suspect a FC subscription would include it.

Kyle G. Anderson

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1170248#Comment_1170248

The RVI is coming later. There will be some limited morph tagging of Strong's reference numbers. Beyond that it has the normal Bible functionality.

Kevin A. Purcell

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1170327#Comment_1170327

That's kind of a terrible result. It took so much longer than the competition to produce. We were told its because Logos is special. They add all kinds of extra stuff the competition has. The competition on day one had all the strong's and morph tagging and it came out last winter. That's kind of a disappointment IMO.

David Thomas

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1170329#Comment_1170329

The competition on day one had all the strong's and morph tagging and it came out last winter.

I too have been waiting for NASB20 eagerly, and will consider it a blessing when the RI is available! But I also know that "the competition" was not resourcing the migration of thousands of new resources and users from another software ecosystem [:)] I understand "disappointment" but temper it with understanding.

Kevin A. Purcell

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1170334#Comment_1170334

But I also know that "the competition" was not resourcing the migration of thousands of new resources and users from another software ecosystem I understand "disappointment" but temper it with understanding.

I would if this was not a problem long before they bought WS. This is a common complaint. Logos takes a longer time to produce content than others and claim it's because of the extras, but the competition's extras are always there too and they are just as good. For several reasons I prefer Logos right now, but this is one of the weaknesses of Logos and this book illustrates it.

Just to clarify, I'm not spitting nails mad. I just would like to see this aspect of their book development improve.