Major Problem with the Anchors - Please HELP
Major Problem with the Anchors - Please HELP
I included a link to the Demonstration on this problem.
I have been using Logos for over 10 years and have NEVER seen this problem.
Comments
-
I have version 9.5.0.0019. According to your interface features you also have this version?
I can confirm that I succeeded to replicate this in KJV 1900
LLS:KJV1900
2019-09-24T19:56:58Z
KJV1900.logos4
RVI:KJV1900NT
2019-09-24T19:39:56Z
KJV1900NT.lbsrvi
RVI:KJV1900OT
2019-09-24T19:39:56Z
KJV1900OT.lbsrvi0 -
I observed an error in your explanation at 6:23+
You type in Rom 1:2 but expect it to show up in Rom 6:2
the same for Rom 1:3 but expecting it to show up in Rom 6:3
But regardless of this error I could still replicate it.
0 -
Seems to me that if some of the anchors in the note are sequential eg (Rom 1:1, Rom 1:2, Rom 1:3), albeit not necessarily in sequential order in the note (Rom 1:2, Rom 1:3, Rom 1:1), then it will treat them specifically as a single anchor of a range (Rom 1:1-3), so you only get the one note icon at the start of the range, not for each anchor.
Anchors that are not in a range will get an icon, and multiple ranges are allowed, each getting a single icon.
Whether or not it should be like this is debatable. You could add a highlight to the note which would then show the range, with the icon just at the start. This way you would know that a verse does have a note applied.
0 -
Seems to me that if some of the anchors in the note are sequential eg (Rom 1:1, Rom 1:2, Rom 1:3), albeit not necessarily in sequential order in the note (Rom 1:2, Rom 1:3, Rom 1:1), then it will treat them specifically as a single anchor of a range (Rom 1:1-3), so you only get the one note icon at the start of the range, not for each anchor.
Anchors that are not in a range will get an icon, and multiple ranges are allowed, each getting a single icon.
Whether or not it should be like this is debatable. You could add a highlight to the note which would then show the range, with the icon just at the start. This way you would know that a verse does have a note applied.
I think you are right about that. It is not allowing Anchors to be back to back because they are so close together and looked at as one anchor
0 -
Seems to me that if some of the anchors in the note are sequential eg (Rom 1:1, Rom 1:2, Rom 1:3), albeit not necessarily in sequential order in the note (Rom 1:2, Rom 1:3, Rom 1:1), then it will treat them specifically as a single anchor of a range (Rom 1:1-3), so you only get the one note icon at the start of the range, not for each anchor.
Anchors that are not in a range will get an icon, and multiple ranges are allowed, each getting a single icon.
Whether or not it should be like this is debatable. You could add a highlight to the note which would then show the range, with the icon just at the start. This way you would know that a verse does have a note applied.
Yeah I noticed that mistake also.
0
